Posted: Wed May 01, 2013 9:35 am
Oh and you have permission to post again
So this hydra is a target because of inactivity, while Jebus isn't a target because ...inactivity?In post 455, Krab Bucket wrote:I'd equate Jebus's play as sloppy, and anti-town, but not necessarily scummy as such, which is why he's not a suspect of mine. I can still understand why you guys are voting him though, we do need him to contribute somehow.
~Krabs
You seem like scum.In post 471, Krab Bucket wrote:@Doctor: What are your reads?
this post pinged my scumdarIn post 469, Doctor C Niall DeMencha wrote:if you're going for the split personality type play to justify mistakes, don't.In post 436, GoodCopBadCop wrote:Just looked at their ISOs, was not impressed by scum reads on these lazy slots
how will you respond to aVote: Nero Cain?
-BadCop
I might be sillyIn post 481, Nero Cain wrote:So you're being silly for silly sake. Why are we not policy lynching this hydra?
so its shit to scumhunt?In post 460, Svenskt Stål wrote:I just want to point out how bad GCBC have played here.
GCBC asks where to put vote <--- bad in itself
nero says ferret and someone else
GCBC iso´s them both in 4 minutes
GCBC vote nero for having bad reads
everyone is like "yo, wtf?"
GCBC votes ferret and claims that nero has earned his vote
So... GCBC went from thinking that ferret was a bad vote to a good vote in like... 20 minutes?
He also doesnt specify how nero earned his vote.
Man thats alot of shit.
your read on me is wrong, your read on nero won't help us todayIn post 450, Krab Bucket wrote:Personally, my 4 targets of the day would be Ravenpaw (reasons listed above), Doctor whatever (pathetic contributions, from a hydra that's disgraceful), Amethyst (hasn't been scumhunting, and then calls me opportunistic without expanding on it at all), and Nero Cain (The meta comment from Monkey was really interesting, and Nero's reasoning for jumping on the Skull wagon was poor)
~Krabs
Well, I don't have much of a meta to speak of. This is only my second game on Mafiascum, and I would not recommend looking up my first game since my play was pretty horrendous there (just ask Nacho).In post 392, Svenskt Stål wrote:Skull, I have completely ignored you and your wagon this game, if I were to do some ISOing on you and maybee pull up some of your past games what should I be looking for in your play that sudgests that you are town this game?
Not intentionally, no. I never jumped on the FuDuzn wagon, nor did I endorse it in any way.In post 394, Ravenpaw wrote:Or do you believe that Fuduzn’s wagon had nothing to do with you?
He did, but we were still in RVS at that point, so I didn't think much of it.In post 394, Ravenpaw wrote:Also, don’t forget that Fudz would vote you because of the votes he’d gathered.
Okay, I think I see what the problem is here. I thought you were just asking what that figure of speech meant, but you were actually asking why I said it, right? If that's the case, I apologize for misunderstanding the question.In post 394, Ravenpaw wrote:And this is becoming a little pet peeve of mine in mafia games. I asked you a question, yet someone else deemed it necessary to butt in before you could answer. I wanted your explanation because you were inferring a town read on Fudz because you liked the cut of his jib, that's why I wanted your thoughts. But seeing as Fudz answered before you could, you can now sheep his response, which you just did do (and hey, I don’t blame you).
I do, yes. Thank you for clarifying.In post 394, Ravenpaw wrote:No, it’s called keeping an open mind, which is essential for mafia games.
Fun fact: my introduction to the delightful world of mafia games actually came from a WWE themed game, and scum won that. The relevant point here is that the last mafia member was John Cena, which everyone had written him off as “oh he’s Cena, of course he’s town”. So it’s not a sure thing to write off facey faces as obvious town (or heely heels as obvious scum).
That’s why I brought it up. Do you see the point I was trying to get across to Esquire?
I don't know if "hesitation" is the right word. I only have one vote, so I can't very well vote for all four of you at once, can I?In post 394, Ravenpaw wrote:This reads list is slightly weird because it really feels like you should be voting for me, not Nero. Why the hesitation to get on my wagon Skull?
This..."trap" of yours has one glaring flaw: it can catch both Town and Scum indiscriminately. How do you intend to tell the difference between the players who have fallen for your masterful mental machinations?In post 430, Krab Bucket wrote:The point of me keeping it quiet is so I can bait people pushing for an easy lynch. Then I can spring the trap by quoting that post.
That place hasn't closed yet?In post 89, Nero Cain wrote:I feel like I'm in a RK game and no one wants to do anything for fear of coming across scummy.
lmaoIn post 97, Svenskt Stål wrote:I also dont like ametysth actor, taking a holliday as a hydra, wtf.
By worse, do you mean scummier?In post 99, Fuzzyman wrote:Malcolm, there are a lot of players right now with a lot worse reasons for their votes.
:blank stare:In post 485, Nero Cain wrote:nope!!! Your vote was scummy just like my vote on skull was scummy. Only scum can be scummy.
If you read the game you're referring to, it's pretty damned evident I was phone posting and trying to prevent the town from doing something abysmally stupid.In post 415, Nero Cain wrote:Raven: I don't really care for any of Goats 5 posts he was not posting here but still playing in his other gamea. Put your vote on him and lets see what he does.
I don't see how you can say that about me when, thus far, I've said more or less nothing.In post 479, Krab Bucket wrote:Jebus has been posting in thread, while you haven't. His posting style also doesn't seem manufactured.
Also, explain your other thoughts.
~Krabs