Mafiascum.net

In post 469, Shadi1337 wrote:Hey, Kuribo. Let's calm it down a bit. I meant in general, I know you've been here for 9 hours.

What's with the attitude, anyway? It's a game so stop being an internet warrior.

I think you missed "soon enough" and "when ya can". It was general advice, if you keep dodging reads you will be a suspect. Also I gave my reads earlier on, ISO me or something.

do you like meta?


you wanna read some of my meta?


I EAT SCUM FUCKS LIKE YOU FOR BREAKFAST AND SHIT OUT THEIR LYNCHES

after six pages I'm actually kinda annoyed that i'm reading fuz as town

Ok definition of lurking is someone who is not posting or only posting to avoid being prodded or posting only in response to a prod. Not someone who is not giving reads and is posting. You might see them as scummy for not giving reads but not a lurker.

In post 476, kuribo wrote:after six pages I'm actually kinda annoyed that i'm reading fuz as town

It is just impossible to hate me

In post 134, Shadi1337 wrote:Welp, 7:30 AM so prolly a good idea to hop to bed. I might read and/or post while being on my phone but no more PC for the night

Hope you guys think your decisions out thoroughly. Good luck to both teams and let the games begin ^^

Do take all actions in account:

I made a joke due to my name.
I "bussed" Rach; if it's enough for you to conclude scum then I shall not try to argue against because it's pointless. I will argue if and when I find a target whose suspicion is on a higher level. I guess I'm #1 so far

appeal to emotion and minimizing the case against him

(neither of the things you mentioned are why you're scummy)

In post 136, Shadi1337 wrote:If lynching me is what you genuinely feel is appropriate then have at it and face your mistake after.

MORE appeal to emotion


hey shadi, i'll tell you a secret about me: I can read appeals to emotion and reaction to emotion better than almost anyone on the site



By Page 7, I'm betting that at least one scum among the lurkers, scum like it when town tear into one another and tend to sit back. If Shadi is scum, then the buddy may not be sure how to defend / attack him so early on

In post 152, Empking wrote:I think scum would have reacted more to this Shadi thing if Shadi's scum.

how do you figure?

In post 156, Shadi1337 wrote:+ you guys are too busy tunneling me instead of lurkers. If I start to tunnel players now, it'd seem a bit suspicious.

oh now that cans it


"STOP LOOKING AT ME, KILL A LURKER"

yeah no, that right there would have me dayvigging your ass if i could

- anorway flaking is not an alignment tell since he probably siteflaked.

In post 169, Torcinator wrote:Sorry, I meant that I'm just bad on the first day, period.

i know what you mean, i tend to just spend the first day screaming at people. you should try it sometime

In post 176, Torcinator wrote:AW. I THINK THAT I'LL WAIT UNTIL PEOPLE VOICE THEIR OPINIONS FURTHER.

YES LET THE HATE FILL YOU TO THE BRIM WITH YOUR MURDER

MORE CAPS, MORE RAGE, BECOME MY APPRENTICE AND WE SHALL TEACH THE SCUM TO FEAR

YOKE KICK HIM IN THE TRACHEA

In post 188, Torcinator wrote:For a random reference that nobody whatsoever will get, :toonlink:

OKAY WE FUCKING GET IT STOP BEING SO TOWN


GOD IF YOU WANNA FUCK MY SISTER JUST ASK


(she's really into town players)

In post 192, FuDuzn wrote:Also why would Yates be lazy uninterested scum? Seems like a weird scum tell.

I've played against Yates-scum, though that was WWE Attitude 2.0 Mafia and I was on the opposite scum team. And I had no idea he was scum, so.

(aka the game where I was so obnoxious that my own scumbuddies wished for death just so they could stop reading me, though in my defense, i had just found out my wife was cheating on me, so i was kind of a jerk in that game)

In post 211, Torcinator wrote:VOTE: Selkies
I just don't want to look scummy by bandwagoning, but...
#YOLO

there is no way that scum, newb or otherwise would vocalize this thought



right?

In post 222, Torcinator wrote:If you'd PAY ATTENTION to my posts, you'd see that I say, "I'm generally bad D1," so don't expect much from me D1.

this needs more caps try saying it like this


"jesus fucking CHRIST, MAN! IF YOU'D USE THE FUCKING BRAIN THAT EVOLUTION PRESUMABLY FUCKING GAVE YOU, AND PAY ATTENTION FOR TWO GOD DAMN SECONDS, YOU'D SEE THAT I ALREADY TOLD YOU I SUCKED ASS ON DAY ONE! READING COMPREHENSION, FUCKER"


yeah, try saying it like that

In post 224, Shadi1337 wrote:Agreed, give it a shot and give a read of at least 4 players; make it concise or as long as you want. Just throw in a t least a little effort Come on dude, be a part of the game. This is a friendly push, we don't bite we only lynch

this is disingenuous as fuck, because earlier you accused Selkies of vote-hopping with good reason and now you say he's not posting his reads?


WHAT THE FUCK DO YOU THINK VOTES ARE


caught up to the end of page nine, and the murderdick is becoming engorged

do 9p micros run 7-2 or 6-3?

how many scum am i looking for?

@ The bussing situation

I was being pretty damn blatant about it.

I told you I was being tired of being defended by silly reasons as being a noob, and other random reasons like RM so I just wanted people to stop doing that..

Also why is everything you say aggressive? It doesn't make you look any smarter, I'd even say it does contra.

Why I would care if people jump on my vote? Dude excuse me, are you trying to make my head explode? I need to see who jumps on a wagon first of all, basics? Second I just stated that I WOULDN'T care if they voted on her, as in I wouldn't remove my vote. Trying to disprove alliance, granted it was a fishy move. Should I try to argue that it isn't fishy when it is? That would be even fishier..

I have a read on Kuribo, the read is that he's mentally disabled.

well, of course that's what you're saying, you cant very well call me scum because you'd be afraid some newbie would yell "OMGUS HE'S OMGUSING" and you can't vote me because hammering me would be tantamount to a scum claim



i'm aggressive because on some level i don't like playing mafia

In post 482, Shadi1337 wrote:Trying to disprove alliance, granted it was a fishy move.

WHY WOULD YOU BOTHER TRYING TO DISPROVE AN ALLIANCE

WHY RACH SPECIFICALLY?

WHY ARE YOU SO FUCKING WORRIED THAT PEOPLE WILL THINK YOU'RE BUDDIES?

What if I were to accuse you of being buddies with Empking?

In post 482, Shadi1337 wrote:I have a read on Kuribo, the read is that he's mentally disabled.

even now he tries to discredit me (suprise, fucker, it won't work because there are people in this game that actually know i know what i'm doing)

"mentally disabled," and yet I've roped more scum than you could count. I've lynched some of the best fucking scum players on this site. You don't stand a chance, little man.

I would 'think" there are two scum, but given the Goonies flavor there may very well be three scum.

Actually, being smart about it most likely two scum. Would seem a bit unfair otherwise.

Pre Edit: UNVOTE:

In post 483, kuribo wrote:well, of course that's what you're saying, you cant very well call me scum because you'd be afraid some newbie would yell "OMGUS HE'S OMGUSING" and you can't vote me because hammering me would be tantamount to a scum claim



i'm aggressive because on some level i don't like playing mafia

Lynching you is simply not in my interest for any other reason than you being annoyed, unfortunately in this case that would be against wincon.

Then don't play?? lol

In post 484, kuribo wrote:

In post 482, Shadi1337 wrote:Trying to disprove alliance, granted it was a fishy move.

WHY WOULD YOU BOTHER TRYING TO DISPROVE AN ALLIANCE

WHY RACH SPECIFICALLY?

WHY ARE YOU SO FUCKING WORRIED THAT PEOPLE WILL THINK YOU'RE BUDDIES?

I was "scared" because I didn't want to be seeing having a buddy, also it's a different story when only one busses or both do it.

Also if you are gonna keep being aggressive I will give a disclaimer, I won't answer you. I'm here to play a detective game with hopefully competent players.

In post 485, kuribo wrote:What if I were to accuse you of being buddies with Empking?

I think I nearly got him fully lynched at some point, but other than that I really don't have many arguments again. I'd have to read a few pages back.

In post 486, kuribo wrote:

In post 482, Shadi1337 wrote:I have a read on Kuribo, the read is that he's mentally disabled.

even now he tries to discredit me (suprise, fucker, it won't work because there are people in this game that actually know i know what i'm doing)

"mentally disabled," and yet I've roped more scum than you could count. I've lynched some of the best fucking scum players on this site. You don't stand a chance, little man.

Either you are tunneling to get information or you are indeed what I stated you to be.

annoyed --> annoying

In post 249, Shadi1337 wrote:Well >_> yourself wasn't meant to be included. Now see, this wasn't so hard was it.

why were you sated when he gave 3 reads (one town, one scum, one null) and called himself town? This is not what you asked for.

In post 267, Aafter wrote:Hey. Can we stop voting without explaining why? I don't like it. Nobody else likes it. And it looks scummy.

this is a pretty town post

In post 269, Shadi1337 wrote:Can the 2 recent votes on me please explain with WORDS? Ty.

this on the other hand is not

(anyone care to explain to the class why?)

In post 270, Mac wrote:

In post 152, Empking wrote:I think scum would have reacted more to this Shadi thing if Shadi's scum.

In post 266, Empking wrote:

Unvote
Vote: shadi

can I have an explanation when you're ready empking.

ohhh snap, i like where you're going with this

In post 277, Shadi1337 wrote:VOTE: Empking

Also, don't do the last vote on him, give him a little time to explain maybe a day. This is just for him to realise he's on thin ice.

and look what piles on, work that town cred baby

(in my head, i predicted this before i read the post)

AND DON'T EVER TELL SOMEONE YOU'RE VOTING THEM FOR PRESSURE


god i fucking hate when people do that

In post 286, Mac wrote:What's the case? His Empking vote had shades of opportunism in it, I can see that much.

disagree

In post 288, Empking wrote:If I say someone is town and then vote them my reads have changed.

THe anarchy that's in the current votes looks to me like something caused by an insidious active scum presence - if town caused I'd expected it be easier to name names for the causes.

oh god dammit am i coming down with senile dementia


i actually agree with an empking post


i hate you all for causing this

In post 295, Yates wrote:

In post 293, FuDuzn wrote:with the relative lack of activity from him I thought it was pretty damning

Why is Empking's "relative lack of activity" any more "damning" than mine? Also, since when is low activity on day 1 a scum indicator? If anything, the lynch all lurkers bs policy being pushed on Day 1 is more likely to come from scum than Town. I'm going to go back and review and vote for the person pushing this the hardest.

Yates just towned hard

and for the record, scum Yates pushes an agenda


also I have another tell on Yates but I need to wait and see for that one

In post 297, Yates wrote:I also like how your "good lynches" lie in the two biggest lurkers [ie. the lowest information lynches] a newb, and an easy wagon. Opportunistic scum, per chance?

this is actually wrong because of 9 players, there were many, many lurkers, two "newbs" and an easy wagon with Selkies being the most active poster.

SOMEONE has to be a good lynch other than himself, and by this point almost everyone except the "newbs" and the "easy wagon" weren't posting much

In post 300, Shadi1337 wrote:Activity, lovely. Also a vague but still an explanation from Empking. Also lovely.

again, you asked for content and were strangely mollified by the barest posting of what you asked for


you sure are easy to please


wanna have sex?

In post 316, Torcinator wrote:I must say, this is the first time I've ever acted scummy. Even when I was scum for the first time, I was very pro-town.

AGH


NO


WHY WOULD YOU POST THIS



THAT MOTHERFUCKING MODIFIED AMISHED TELL


WHAT THE EVERLIVING FUCK


god dammit

In post 332, Empking wrote:

In post 331, RachMarie wrote:What about other players Empking?

I'm thinking Mac for also scum. It's just a feeling.

not enough mac posts for me to read at this point, but agree with him about shadi

In post 343, RachMarie wrote:but also good at being town..

why do you lie about him, empking is awful

In post 350, Aafter wrote:Mafia isn't a game of gut feeling.

WRONG

In post 364, AngryPidgeon wrote:Ive barely read, but Shadi is prolly town.

that's a terrible opinion

In post 366, AngryPidgeon wrote:I'm back at my laptop now.

Shadi is town for P14

100% guarantee. I should have time to catch up here by end of today.

and a terrible reason

I don't like how AngryPidgeon decides early to tunnel on a slot that was force-replaced and then filled by someone who wasn't around

although he's posting at a rate that suggests he may be smoking crack, so he might be town. i find constant posting hard to get a scumread on because free-and-easy posting frequency is caused by the comfort of knowing you have a town wincon

although he's being an idiot here so i'm disregarding any and all opinion or read which centers on my slot being scum

In post 399, Shadi1337 wrote:@Mod I am checking the thread daily but not sure what to type at this moment. There haven't been more than 18 posts from approx 3 players.

ALWAYS


FUCKING


POST



NEVER BE NOT FUCKING POSTING


this post is scummy too, lalala, giving an excuse as to why he's not posting (aka actual lurking which he seems to accuse people of left and right)

In post 419, AngryPidgeon wrote:Hi Bac de. I'm nervous about you correctly reading me for the 3rd time in a row as scum, so what do I have to do to prove my townieness to you?

the logicbone in my brain tells me scum wouldn't post this


the paranoiabone in my heart tells me AP is cheeky enough to post this as scum

the sexbone in my withered cock wants Shadi's blood on it

i am a man of many bones

In post 422, Jake from State Farm wrote:kuribo replaces the Doc

fuck yeah this guy is awesome

In post 489, Shadi1337 wrote:Either you are tunneling to get information or you are indeed what I stated you to be.

i don't tunnel to get information, so it's nice that you're still trying to downplay it


i tunnel when i find scum


here, let me show you

AngryPigeon- I had mac as townish, not quite sure about AP yet
Yates- Probably town
FuDuzn- Obvious town
kuribo- this guy is the shit
Empking- Maybe town, but it's Empking and I can't read him for shit.
Bacde- Aafter was a weak townread, but I can read Bacde really well so I'm withholding judgement until
RachMarie- I'm finding her hard to read she COULD be scum. I might actually meta her.
Torcinator- Town as fuck, winner of the 31st annual Kuribo Award For People Who Should Never Be Lynched
Shadi1337- scum for all of the reasons I mentioned

actually i take that back for Torc

99% of his posts are town, but even though the Amished Tell is observably bullshit most of the time, it still gives me the jitters when dropped by a player that's likely never heard of it


so i'll amend Torc to "mostly town"

Rach is always a pain to read, I always think she is scum and then when I back off her as a scum reason because of meta......she ends up being scum. What is troubling me about her this game though, is that she has offered very little real content even though I keep asking her to do something. But then I end up back where I started with not being able to read her, it is all a big mind fuck. Rach, stop being Rach.

But K-Bo....RE: Shadi, you do say you would buss the shit out of your scum buddy so I could see you bussing Shadi here.......but that leap also means that Shadi is scum. I like the odds here and will take the all caps batshit insane rage train with you.

But similar to your threat earlier, there maybe some rope for you Tomorrow.

VOTE: Shadi

Pre Edit: Don't be waffling now as soon as I start to trust you.....

In post 495, FuDuzn wrote:But K-Bo....RE: Shadi, you do say you would buss the shit out of your scum buddy so I could see you bussing Shadi here

i don't actually know if i would in a micro since i've never played in one before. seriously, though, are we looking for two scum or three?


but if you're believing my self meta there, i'd also never claim VT as scum--- not knowing the rest of the setup, it would be suicidal if i ever got tracked anywhere. plus i can't change my claim later which is like my favorite part of being scum


i hate being VT. so. much.

Two scum, unless there is some funky game mechanic going on.

yeah i kinda figured it wouldn't start one mislynch from LYLO

only way it's three is if they don't get an NK, and that would be a little unusual in a closed setup

if there's just two of them could they have daytalk?