Posted: Sun Jun 16, 2013 11:28 am
V/LA
jon_h61: June 16
^^ I completely agree with this. If I was just an onlooking town I'd say either we're both town or one of us is scum, not that both of us are scum.In post 473, pitoli wrote:I highly doubt that Xiao/rmp's early interactions were that of two partners...
Okay, I can definitely see this happening.In post 478, rmpeacoc wrote:okay here's my issue... Mutley comes in knowing he's scum... sees votes on him and votes on the most obviously easy bandwagon. How is this difficult to see?
Sorry, I left the house at 10 this morning and JUST got home...In post 479, pitoli wrote:Frustrated with the current rate of posts...
I will agree with this as well. That would be very sophisticated/risky play for a game at this level (no offense).rmpeacoc wrote:^^ I completely agree with this. If I was just an onlooking town I'd say either we're both town or one of us is scum, not that both of us are scum.In post 473, pitoli wrote:I highly doubt that Xiao/rmp's early interactions were that of two partners...
Also, could you clarify this please?In post 456, Mutleyddmc wrote: To the people on the wagon it's not surprising you are on day 2 with no kill or lynch.
This line is interesting, indeed.I'm sure there are many theories on last nights NK, I don't think any really need to be said until we have a flip.
In post 480, JerryArr wrote:Okay, I can definitely see this happening.In post 478, rmpeacoc wrote:okay here's my issue... Mutley comes in knowing he's scum... sees votes on him and votes on the most obviously easy bandwagon. How is this difficult to see?
VOTE: Mutleyddmc,putting him at L-1.
I'd also like to ask him to elaborate on his reads. You've say you've caught up, but why do you believe people are town instead of null or scum, and vice versa?
In post 483, Xiao Long wrote:Also, could you clarify this please?In post 456, Mutleyddmc wrote: To the people on the wagon it's not surprising you are on day 2 with no kill or lynch.This line is interesting, indeed.I'm sure there are many theories on last nights NK, I don't think any really need to be said until we have a flip.
Maybe I deserve the other votes that I have but don't you agree that there are far better reasons to vote me than the reason that mutley gave?In post 482, Xiao Long wrote: I'm not so sure I agree with people saying he's just throwing a vote on rmp to take attention away, I think she fully deserves the votes she has. I'm okay with either one being lynched, y'know, if we can actually lynch someone this time. <.<
I don't like this at all. It is so anti-town that I would almost call it a scum-slip. To me, it reads like this: "Please don't replace lortaku because we are so close to lynching him and if we get a replacement we will lose this easy lynch and everything will be messed up while everyone gets a new read on the replacement". If Mr. Flay was town, why wouldn't he want a replacement? lortaku was pretty terrible and gave us all a lot of difficulty reading the slot because he was so lurky and when he actually posted his posts didn't have much substance. Why would you not want someone to breath new life into the slot to give town a chance to get a proper read of it. By trying to stop him being replaced Mr. Flay was trying to deny the town extra information that we could have used when deciding who to lynch. It is only in scum's interest to deprive the town of information and I think an IC would know that.In post 445, Mr. Flay wrote:Can you warn us if you're thinking about getting a replacement, so we have the option to lynch instead?
I don't like the way you are ruling him out (I'm guessing it's because he's the IC). Why shouldn't we lynch Flay? Roles were given out randomly so it's not like he's any less likely than the rest of us to be scum. It's a bad way to play to rule certain people out of lynch contention. Basically means that they have a free pass/are immune to your scrutiny.In post 461, rmpeacoc wrote:i think just about any flip would give us information...In post 459, Mutleyddmc wrote:Tbh we need a flip. Looking at this game there's 3 people I think the game could get a lot if info from there flips. Me you and flay. I have you as much scummier than flay so I'd rather your flip
Anyway we are certainly not lynching Flay. That's a really bad idea.
I still think we should lynch you.
I'd rather not too, but only because I see more of a case against jon.In post 491, Mutleyddmc wrote:Kattaze I'd rather not lynch flay today. He is a hige candidate for tomorrow.
I disagree. Flay was saying here that he'd rather not get confused by a replacement. It's almost like people are scared to lynch someone when they are a replacement because they don't know if their original read is right or not, and then you get all skeptical. I think you're reading too far into this one.In post 490, Kattaze wrote:Apologies for not posting in a while, I've been quite busy.
I don't like this at all. It is so anti-town that I would almost call it a scum-slip. To me, it reads like this: "Please don't replace lortaku because we are so close to lynching him and if we get a replacement we will lose this easy lynch and everything will be messed up while everyone gets a new read on the replacement". If Mr. Flay was town, why wouldn't he want a replacement? lortaku was pretty terrible and gave us all a lot of difficulty reading the slot because he was so lurky and when he actually posted his posts didn't have much substance. Why would you not want someone to breath new life into the slot to give town a chance to get a proper read of it. By trying to stop him being replaced Mr. Flay was trying to deny the town extra information that we could have used when deciding who to lynch. It is only in scum's interest to deprive the town of information and I think an IC would know that.In post 445, Mr. Flay wrote:Can you warn us if you're thinking about getting a replacement, so we have the option to lynch instead?
[/quote]I don't like the way you are ruling him out (I'm guessing it's because he's the IC). Why shouldn't we lynch Flay? Roles were given out randomly so it's not like he's any less likely than the rest of us to be scum. It's a bad way to play to rule certain people out of lynch contention. Basically means that they have a free pass/are immune to your scrutiny.In post 461, rmpeacoc wrote:i think just about any flip would give us information...In post 459, Mutleyddmc wrote:Tbh we need a flip. Looking at this game there's 3 people I think the game could get a lot if info from there flips. Me you and flay. I have you as much scummier than flay so I'd rather your flip
Anyway we are certainly not lynching Flay. That's a really bad idea.
I still think we should lynch you.
If you are town why would you say that? Someone should certainly NOT hammer you if you're town, because then we lose a chance to lynch scum.In post 494, Mutleyddmc wrote:Someone should just hammer me, get a flip go for RM then flay possibly after that (I need info to solidfy my read on flay)
Thats fair enough and I agree. However theres not going to be a whole lot of great discussion, its basically day 1. So 2 lots of day 1 gets boring and discussion goes around and aroundIn post 498, Kattaze wrote:I'd rather vote for someone I actually think is scum, hence my current vote. We'll get more info from his flip than yours anyway.
If it comes down to a no-lynch situation again then I would hammer you.