Page 20 of 79

Posted: Tue Jun 18, 2013 7:53 pm
by TiphaineDeath
Eh, I'll wait for rofl to say something, if I don like what e' says I'll see im hanged. Till then I'll keep mah vote on mr squidey mc scumslip.

Posted: Tue Jun 18, 2013 8:02 pm
by Psyche
whatscumslip

Posted: Tue Jun 18, 2013 8:03 pm
by Zoidberg
In post 471, Varsoon wrote:Zoid, how do I know you're not some scum PR and you're trying to buy yourself a night to use your powers?
You don't.

But if I was something awesome like a scum inventor, don't you think I'd have kept a lower profile? My play has been pretty reckless this game; not exactly a winning strategy. I could have gone the roflcopter-style active lurking route.

Instead, I've been tunneling pretty hard on scummy people in succession until I'm satisfied. First it was TIP, now it's rofl. If/when I'm satisfied I'll pick someone else. This is my town meta and you can see for yourself.

Posted: Tue Jun 18, 2013 8:57 pm
by Varsoon
Well, that's the power of a bluff. It makes town WIFOM. Scum wouldn't possibly be so ballsy, right? Right?

I don't think 477 is a good defense.

@Desperado: Makes sense, actually. I guess speculation on BRO's death really only gives us wifom-able material, given we don't know who/what alignment made the kill.

Posted: Tue Jun 18, 2013 9:03 pm
by Varsoon
Also-also, how do you know that Roflcopter is 'active' lurking?
There's plenty of people with low post counts in this game.

Posted: Tue Jun 18, 2013 9:52 pm
by T S O
all these wagons are uninspired as fuck imo

If I had to pick one, it'd be Varsoon.

Then again, if I had to pick a method of death, it would be an overdose of medication.

doesn't mean it's necessarily good

CAN SOMEONE SUMMARISE THE ROFL CASE FOR ME. THANKS.

Posted: Tue Jun 18, 2013 9:56 pm
by TiphaineDeath
"Mah name is zoidberg and I know dere are three scumz, oh wait, just kidding lolz."

Posted: Tue Jun 18, 2013 10:04 pm
by T S O
that wasn't the rofl case.

Posted: Tue Jun 18, 2013 10:42 pm
by Varsoon
In post 482, T S O wrote:that wasn't the rofl case.
Zoidberg did just a few posts ago.

C'mon man, read the thread.

Posted: Tue Jun 18, 2013 11:13 pm
by T S O
In post 468, Zoidberg wrote:
In post 466, Varsoon wrote:Zoid, why should I wagon Rofl?

I usually have integrity when voting, man.
Because he's scum and active-lurking, not to mention repeatedly dodging questions. Wagon him to make him actually do some analysis. You can always jump off if you like his case.
Oh, this? I thought there might be something more to it.

"He's scum! Why? He's dodged questions? What's that? It's not like he was here to answer them? ...well, he's active lurking! Yeah, that's it!"

Also, the end makes me think that hilariously this is a pressure wagon.

I was hoping there was more.

Posted: Wed Jun 19, 2013 1:20 am
by boxxy
Sorry for being MIA for so long. I was V/LA over the weekend but didn't tell mod and monday/tuesday were pretty busy.

Catching up now. So far I'm on page 16.

Varsoon is tunnelling Zoidberg pretty strongly, and I don't think his case is very strong. Scum would have to be pretty stupid to reveal slip both day-talk and multi-ball, and looking at the amount of thought that goes into Zoid's cases I just don't buy it that he slipped twice in a short period.

As for TIP, in the first couple pages or so I had a strong scum read on him. But after a while it looks more like he feels more town. He had a lot of posts that were short and confusing, and his aggressive voting for Varsoon looks like town that was posting quickly without caring what people think of him or how they mince his words. That looks like town play to me, scum tend to be more careful with their words.

As for scum reads, I'm looking at Varsoon and rolfcopter. Varsoon's case against zoid is weak and is trying to drive attention away from Zoid's case on rofl, which although being a largely speculation, actually has some merit beyond "OMG He scum slipped clearly."

Posted: Wed Jun 19, 2013 1:48 am
by TheIrishPope
boxxy, you smart kitty
Metal Sonic, the thing is, you can't outguess the setup, so there's no need in speculating if it was a town dayvig or a scum dayvig or a passive role that kills people involuntarily
Also, why would a town dayvig shoot BRO? If I was a town dayvig, I'd go for a more outspoken player.

Posted: Wed Jun 19, 2013 2:07 am
by T S O
Why would a scum dayvig shoot Bro?

...why the hell would a town dayvig shoot an outspoken player?

Posted: Wed Jun 19, 2013 2:09 am
by TheIrishPope
To confuse Town
Also, like I said, there might be other roles which are automatic, so yeah

Posted: Wed Jun 19, 2013 2:11 am
by T S O
I highly doubt the Dayvig is automatic :/

Posted: Wed Jun 19, 2013 2:12 am
by TheIrishPope
Again, we don't know the setup

Posted: Wed Jun 19, 2013 2:25 am
by T S O
We don't, but I've never seen an automatic Dayvig, ever.

Posted: Wed Jun 19, 2013 2:26 am
by TheIrishPope
Given this isn't a normal setup, we can never be sure

Posted: Wed Jun 19, 2013 4:27 am
by Metal Sonic
When Varsoon claims scum

he means it

lynch him ffs


Roflcopter is also a good lynch though I would join

Posted: Wed Jun 19, 2013 4:47 am
by Desperado
In post 493, Metal Sonic wrote:When Varsoon claims scum

he means it

lynch him ffs


Roflcopter is also a good lynch though I would join
If you have meta on Varsoon why haven't you linked it yet?

Posted: Wed Jun 19, 2013 4:47 am
by Desperado
In post 493, Metal Sonic wrote:When Varsoon claims scum

he means it

lynch him ffs


Roflcopter is also a good lynch though I would join
If you have meta on Varsoon why haven't you linked it yet?

Posted: Wed Jun 19, 2013 5:25 am
by Psyche
In post 481, TiphaineDeath wrote:"Mah name is zoidberg and I know dere are three scumz, oh wait, just kidding lolz."
This is a misrep.

Posted: Wed Jun 19, 2013 5:26 am
by Psyche
I'm not going to have my study on claiming scum finished before the end of the Day. :(

Posted: Wed Jun 19, 2013 5:33 am
by Zoidberg
In post 481, TiphaineDeath wrote:"Mah name is zoidberg and I know dere are three scumz, oh wait, just kidding lolz."
In post 482, T S O wrote:that wasn't the rofl case.
In post 483, Varsoon wrote:
In post 482, T S O wrote:that wasn't the rofl case.
Zoidberg did just a few posts ago.

C'mon man, read the thread.
Hey motherfucker, don't put words into my mouth. Thanks.

Posted: Wed Jun 19, 2013 5:47 am
by MonkeyMan576
Rule no 1 please.