Posted: Sun Sep 15, 2013 3:12 pm
The million dollar question.
Page 20 of 53
Posted: Sun Sep 15, 2013 3:14 pm
I am at a loss for words right now.
Posted: Sun Sep 15, 2013 3:15 pm
Nice meaningless one-liner post.
Posted: Sun Sep 15, 2013 3:16 pm
Weekend was even busier than the usual busy.
UNVOTE:
Not feeling so confident about my reads now. I'm not up to date at all.
UNVOTE:
Not feeling so confident about my reads now. I'm not up to date at all.
Posted: Sun Sep 15, 2013 3:17 pm
Posted: Sun Sep 15, 2013 4:15 pm
Yeah I feel a LOT more comfortable in my vote now.
Posted: Sun Sep 15, 2013 4:29 pm
i almost feel like that vote was a "too scummy to be scum" thing...
hm
hm
Posted: Mon Sep 16, 2013 3:02 am
Frankly, if I didn't comment on something awhile back, it did not stick out to me in the thread during my initial read.
I will reread again and go into detail on RT and DB.
SoS, I was looking at post 255. If you didn't think Rebel slipped, why did you vote for the slot?
I will reread again and go into detail on RT and DB.
SoS, I was looking at post 255. If you didn't think Rebel slipped, why did you vote for the slot?
Posted: Mon Sep 16, 2013 3:03 am
I got a blind sheep. I am not liking that.
Posted: Mon Sep 16, 2013 3:04 am
i have popcorn. ready and waiting.titus wrote:and go into detail on RT
Posted: Mon Sep 16, 2013 3:14 am
I did not think Rebel had slipped. I've never seen Nacho slip as scum. Sorting him is not that easy. I decided to vote him because I wasn't getting very far in sorting him at that point.In post 482, Titus wrote:SoS, I was looking at post 255. If you didn't think Rebel slipped, why did you vote for the slot?
Once again, the word "slip" in 255 refers to my posting with my main account in the previous post instead of this one. It had nothing to do with the vote itself.
Posted: Mon Sep 16, 2013 5:58 am
I don't know if I used the word "logical", if I did, it was poor wording, but it's not illogical. He criticized your scumhunting and has a gut-townread on you. One is "technical" the other is about alignment. He still has to clarify regarding his 1. answer.In post 472, Rebel Without a Pulse wrote:So you think it's logical he's leaning gut town on our slot, when he has only mentioned us in negative ways?In post 446, Dessew wrote:Rebel: I kind of belived him the 1., I didn't look it up, and it does come off bad, after all. But his answers 3, 5, 6, 9, 9, 10 were proper, and his other answers (except 1 and 2, but the latter isn't a big deal) make sense, too. But, yes, there's that fisrt one, I can't find the part in that post when he calls HP scummy, he gets "town vibes" from HP at the end of his post.
Posted: Mon Sep 16, 2013 6:07 am
Mod note: I sometimes forget to announce prods on-thread, but they're still sent out when due
Vote Count of the First City, Eighth Block
Players Alive: 13
Votes to Lynch: 7
Format of:
Wagon (size): Voters on wagon
Rail Tracer (2): Titus, Daniel Bryan (L-5)
Notscience (1): artemiskitty (L-6)
Dessew (1): Notscience (L-6)
Daniel Bryan (5): Rebel Without a Pulse, Rail Tracer. Brian Skies, Sound of Silence, Natirasha (L-2)
Natirasha (1): Humble Poirot (L-6)
Mario and the Diamonds (1): Mogamma (L-6)
Brian Skies (1): Dessew (L-6)
Not voting: Mario and the Diamonds
Deadline for Day One falls on: 9/23/13 which is (expired on 2013-09-23 19:00:00)
Posted: Mon Sep 16, 2013 6:21 am
Cabd, I'm voting Brian.
Posted: Mon Sep 16, 2013 6:25 am
Fixed.
Posted: Mon Sep 16, 2013 6:41 am
remind me why you think brian is scum. has this read changed or been reinforced by any of his posts recently?
Posted: Mon Sep 16, 2013 3:47 pm
Is anyone else bugged by the lack of another wagon? Everyone seems to be on a different page and not trying to convince people to follow them (which I admittedly am guilty of myself) and it's bugging the shit out of me.
Posted: Mon Sep 16, 2013 4:20 pm
I haven't really been here unfortunately. Rough couple of days... Without having reread DB and written about some other things I might've not addressed I'm with RT in the concern of DB's vote.
He apparently doesn't try to defend himself further or discuss, just vote without reason. he doesn't seem to be exasperated or tired, he doesn't seem to be displaying any emotion and the lack of content doesn't seem consistent with his apparent ability to post at least a decent wall.
I'd vote him right now but I'm barely here so I'll just issue the warning, that if he sees this, he should step up and produce something because L-1 is really close.
The new guys should've given new breath to the town but they seem more absent than the old guys... Anyway, bear with me for at least one more day. I'll try to read and post in a decent fashion tomorrow.
HP
He apparently doesn't try to defend himself further or discuss, just vote without reason. he doesn't seem to be exasperated or tired, he doesn't seem to be displaying any emotion and the lack of content doesn't seem consistent with his apparent ability to post at least a decent wall.
I'd vote him right now but I'm barely here so I'll just issue the warning, that if he sees this, he should step up and produce something because L-1 is really close.
The new guys should've given new breath to the town but they seem more absent than the old guys... Anyway, bear with me for at least one more day. I'll try to read and post in a decent fashion tomorrow.
HP
Posted: Mon Sep 16, 2013 5:57 pm
See, I'm seeing the DB lynch as noobscum kinda flailing a bit.
Posted: Mon Sep 16, 2013 6:00 pm
This post pings me. Like, it has an illusory valid basis("Why is there no counterwagon"), but when you read into the implications, it sounds to me like he has something to gain from having DB lynched.In post 491, notscience wrote:Is anyone else bugged by the lack of another wagon? Everyone seems to be on a different page and not trying to convince people to follow them (which I admittedly am guilty of myself) and it's bugging the shit out of me.
Posted: Mon Sep 16, 2013 6:27 pm
not particularly. the lack of activity by so many players could have something to do with it.ns wrote:Is anyone else bugged by the lack of another wagon?
it bothers me in the sense that it's extremely antitown, but it doesn't bother me in the sense that it's unexpected given the current activity.
i'm not sure that dessew is scum anymore. some of his posts look kinda town. why do you still think he's scum?
not really.nati wrote:but when you read into the implications, it sounds to me like he has something to gain from having DB lynched
Posted: Mon Sep 16, 2013 7:16 pm
Subject: Ban/Restriction Announcements
This is the offending game in question. Searching for a replacement.
Tierce wrote:Humble Poirot has been banned from signing up for new games for one month for ongoing game discussion and force-replaced from the offending game.
This is the offending game in question. Searching for a replacement.
Posted: Mon Sep 16, 2013 7:55 pm
Yes. I like you. Please be my rock this game, thank you.In post 491, notscience wrote:Is anyone else bugged by the lack of another wagon? Everyone seems to be on a different page and not trying to convince people to follow them (which I admittedly am guilty of myself) and it's bugging the shit out of me.
Nope, doesn't ping me at all, but quite the opposite actually.In post 494, Natirasha wrote:This post pings me. Like, it has an illusory valid basis("Why is there no counterwagon"), but when you read into the implications, it sounds to me like he has something to gain from having DB lynched.In post 491, notscience wrote:Is anyone else bugged by the lack of another wagon? Everyone seems to be on a different page and not trying to convince people to follow them (which I admittedly am guilty of myself) and it's bugging the shit out of me.
Posted: Mon Sep 16, 2013 11:57 pm
Guys. I'm sorry. It wasn't my intention to need a replacement (I've never had). Hope you have a good game.
Posted: Tue Sep 17, 2013 3:03 am
In post 490, Rail Tracer wrote:remind me why you think brian is scum. has this read changed or been reinforced by any of his posts recently?
His posts after #438 don't really add anything for or against this case. Maybe there's the "you don't read properly" part of his answer to Daniel, which looks like a mild discredit attempt to me, but I only found it after I iso'd him.In post 438, Dessew wrote:Daniel's answer is actually pretty good, I'd like to hear Rebel's response if there's any.
And the Fu-wagon is stalling right now, consider as if my vote was on him, but
UNVOTE: Fu
VOTE: Brian Skies
HP has a big role in this read. First: his #430 is on the spot (maybe his other posts are, too, I won't iso now.) Especially the Daniel-vote seems off, Rebel announced he had a case on him, and Brian joined the wagon with some stupid, made-up reason. And I also don't like that in his read on HP the hydradiscussion is overrepresented, but that's a minor issue in comparison.