Mafiascum.net

*sighs* Fine, my vote's not gonna do much there anyway. Problem is, HGH is missing so my vote there won't do much either. N_M would have been my next choice, but his defense of agent makes me want to wait and see how that plays out.

*sighs even more*

VOTE: insanity018

I believe HGH is innocent. I think he's more new-town than mafia. He justifies why he did his list; sure the reasons weren't perfect but I don't think that list was scum motivated.

Since when did we get a dr

Hmm.

In post 409, xfdagentx42 wrote: Insanity, trying to use disadvantages to take control of day. Why does she sound scum? First, she tried to go against me, just because of inactivity. Ofcourse, she wouldnt take me down for no reason, but since i had a disadvantage, shed try to use it and take control of day. (40% scum 60% null)

What does this even mean? What disadvantage?

Moonlight's vote (434)was extremely opportunistic, while completely ignoring the vig claim which had just happened.

In post 382, insanity018 wrote:Leaning scum:

Tammy/Wake

/Moonlight

VOTE: Moonlight

Still willing to lynch Elmo.

@, I'll drink the flight.

This is me confirming by going to the thread and playing immediately as per my role pm.


ISO'd my predecessor after I got asked to replace in and before I got my role, and he has like, one post not flavor-related. Then started reading the posts since the last vote count. Now about to start an actual full read of the game, anything anyone would like me to pay attention to particularly?

no, read up quickly.

In post 485, Malakittens wrote:VOTE: maurchan

SERIOUSLY?!?!?!?!?!?!?

oh hey there is new vote tags? I don't have to fully type VOTE: every time? neato.

In post 444, Malakittens wrote:Well, it's not a full meta-drive. I decided to CTRL+F = townslip. The only times he's ever defended someone for a townslip was when he was town. I don't have the time to full meta-dive at this point. I guess he *could* defend someone for a townslip as scum.

HGH kinda disappeared. That lynch would probably be a policy lynch and atm, i'm not up for it. At least not until the slot is active.

Riddle's last few posts kinda stuck out at me. Maybe leaning scum on him, but {4 scumreads} when there's 3 looks like I'm trying to get partners w/o actually having a flip to determine shit.

In post 485, Malakittens wrote:VOTE: maurchan

So what changed Miss Kitty?

You're reacting very violently to that vote. I don't like that. Are you being defensive to hide your own scumminess?

In post 488, Riddleton wrote:You're reacting very violently to that vote. I don't like that. Are you being defensive to hide your own scumminess?

Eughhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh wow

Rids you just dove off the deep end into my scum pool.

he didn't go anywhere near mine, but Maru is drowning in the deep.

In post 488, Riddleton wrote:You're reacting very violently to that vote. I don't like that. Are you being defensive to hide your own scumminess?

>reacts negatively to a vote placed on him three seconds after repalcing in, with no other text in said post, two pages after and the NEXT POST IN VOTER'S ISO saying that lynching the slot I replaced into was a pure policy lynch that she was uncomfrotable



yeah, being upset at that vote makes me scummy. Totes Magotes.

In post 491, T S O wrote:he didn't go anywhere near mine, but Maru is drowning in the deep.

I can write of Mala's vote as a pressure vote/ whatever the fuck it is. You just said I look scummy. Please make the case, and present it to the town for what in my two posts makes me scummy.

You broke the radar of scumminess in ONE post, one post.

I like my vote, tyvm.

In post 483, Maruchan wrote:This is me confirming by going to the thread and playing immediately as per my role pm.

Why did you feel the need to say "as per my role PM"? You're trying waaay too hard.

In post 483, Maruchan wrote:ISO'd my predecessor after I got asked to replace in and before I got my role, and he has like, one post not flavor-related.

Then you straight up Amished the fuck out of HGH.

In post 483, Maruchan wrote:Then started reading the posts since the last vote count. Now about to start an actual full read of the game, anything anyone would like me to pay attention to particularly?

This just comes off as submissive and appealing.

In post 430, Julatorium wrote:Also, xfd hasn't really been all that scummy. Certainly shouldn't have been forced to claim. Lurky yes, but we find insanity's active vanilla questioning much more scum-telling. We have Not_Mafia as one of our town reads so the fact that some of you are pushing him as the premier lynch is really concerning to us. Also, KB just moved into the leaning-scum category with that vote-after-soft-claim and the unvote-after-claim. They already softed a power role, you know what the power roles are. You wanted them to full claim and it appeared your intentions were to lynch regardless. But then you unvote?

Because now you're my hero.

In post 437, Julatorium wrote:So many scummy people too few slots for scum....Moonlights post just reads like someone who saw that xfd was run up and wanted to hop on the bandwagon.

Did I already unvote you? Not enough.

In post 431, Krystal Bald wrote:The soft claim looked fake. The actual claim is probably fake and I think that xfda is going to be vigged tonight.

Or something. But this is juicier:

In post 438, Malakittens wrote:gaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah.

UNVOTE: Not_Mafia

Quick meta skim makes him likely town, maybe, slighty.

Was Mala the third vote on the xfd wagon? Think so.


And this is just textbook:

In post 453, Moonlight wrote:I hopped too. Why are you after Krystal and not me?

Chuckling at agent's "I'm gonna get vigged". This guy just scumslipped the way I read it. But please, don't mind me, continue focusing on the probably-fake townslip of his.

In post 454, Moonlight wrote:Moreover, it's really unfair to blame anyone but agent for the wagon on him. If this guy is Town, I know I'd shoot him if I was scum because of how easily the pressure got on him.

First there's the twisting of what xfd said. The statement about getting vigged tonight was clearly in response to Krystal Bald's post (quoted above). And the second post is...sorry Mala...gibbereeze (gibereeze being when gibberish is made into a language all its own). If xfd was town not claiming vig scum would want to keep him alive for a lynch, because town that can't take pressure is the best lynch bait there is. Scum will kill xfd because he's a claimed power role.

And this...

In post 456, Moonlight wrote:I'm also considering the mindfuck that can be pulled off by scum if he is telling the truth and they shoot someone else instead. I don't want to believe he outed himself without thinking of the consequences.

xfd will tell us who he intends to kill before the end of the day. There will be no consequences other than the almost certain loss of our vig on night one.



No way I'm voting Insanity today.

Oh, and ucriton? Nothing for me. Never trust a drink from a stranger.

get your vote off Moonlight, that was Tammy's slot.