Mafiascum.net

↑ xRECKONERx wrote:I was shocked by myko's case because there was actual thought and reasoning which is a huge departure.

I didn't say I agreed with it.

You did kind of agree with it though when you entertained lynching me.

↑ xRECKONERx wrote:My god myko is town. I actually really liked his case on MattP :c

but Mattykins I don't wanna lynch you

I'm not joining this. I don't see the scum motivation in errors like this. This is how mislynches happen.

↑ MattP wrote:How could you have confused me with TSO and have had it be "meta related". You had the same meta reason make me be scum as TSO?

Feels like you just randomly stated mykos case on me was good to seem like you had an opinion and then when we realized myko had made a case on

TSO

your bullshit got caught because you had nothing legitimate to have a scumread about

Because I just typed the wrong name and got confused. I literally read the case and then immediately scrolled down and posted a quick reply, I don't know how I forgot who I was talking about in that amount of time. But I really want to lynch you (Matt) because I don't find you scummy, which is why I said that, because by the end of that sentence I actually thought he was talking about you.

Once it was pointed out that it was TSO, I remembered everything. I think I've actually stated my meta thing on TSO before now, maybe... not sure now that I'm typing this but I think it has been alluded to.

↑ Anatole Kuragin wrote:VOTE: xXxReckonerxXx

This is really fucking icky.

Where's the scum motivation in what I'm doing?

Yeah, I think that Anatole's vote sucked.

ITS A VOTE CIRCUS

VOTE: ANATOLE

It actually felt like he was trying to get out ahead of a rallycry of "RECK MESSED UP ERGO SCUMSLIP" and voted me preemptively.

Fencesitting about a case that never existed is scummy. Refusing to give "meta" analysis to defend a supposed goof is also scummy.

What part of voting that is icky or sucked?

I fuck up sometimes too and I was pretty satisfied with your response until you tried to OMGUS me over it despite the TSO shit being shady af - why wouldn't I vote you for the comments you made if they weren't a goof?

Reck, if you saw another player make the comments you made, you wouldn't find that suspicious?

Uh not if there was no actual scum motivation behind it no

When the fuck did I try to OMGUS you

Scum motivation - looking busy, opening mislynch options, buddying players.

↑ Anatole Kuragin wrote:Fencesitting about a case that never existed is scummy. Refusing to give "meta" analysis to defend a supposed goof is also scummy.

What case was I fencesitting that never existed? The MattP thing? How is it fencesitty to say, "I like myko's contributions but I don't arrive at the same conclusion as him"? Or must we always agree 100% with people we find to be producing town content?

And, in what way does my revealing my meta stuff on TSO defend my mistake? My read on TSO and reasons for it are pretty irrelevant to my mistake, why are you conflating the two?

Because it's quite possible you were making up the TSO meta shit to give validity to your excuse about the goof. Scum lie sometimes, unsurprisingly.

↑ Anatole Kuragin wrote:Scum motivation - looking busy, opening mislynch options, buddying players.

"looking busy"- by posting? What the fuck
"opening mislynch options"- uh, on who? You mean when I called MattP town or when I called myko town?
"buddying players"- who was I buddying, Matt or Myko?

↑ Anatole Kuragin wrote:TSO meta shit

validity to your excuse

please explain how you got from a to b here

↑ xRECKONERx wrote:

↑ Anatole Kuragin wrote:Scum motivation - looking busy, opening mislynch options, buddying players.

"looking busy"- by posting? What the fuck
"opening mislynch options"- uh, on who? You mean when I called MattP town or when I called myko town?
"buddying players"- who was I buddying, Matt or Myko?

This is operating under the assumption that your post was clear that you didn't agree with Myko's "case" against matt.

Uh how was my post not clear since I both praised myko's case and said I didn't want to lynch matt in the same fucking sentence

hence it being weird

Praising a case typically means you agree with the logic behind it. You didn't say you liked the way myko was playing - you said you liked the case.

I want to hear the TSO thing because I would rather give you the benefit of the doubt about this and lynch him.

I have a simple question.
Maybe I missed it, but how do you like a case about a player and how it's put together and think the player is talking about someone else?

"Myko is town...I liked his case...I don't want to lynch Matt"

This are the three statements made in that post.

↑ farside22 wrote:I have a simple question.
Maybe I missed it, but how do you like a case about a player and how it's put together and think the player is talking about someone else?

Because myko mentioned Matt in his case on TSO and for some reason Matt's name was on my mind when I was writing up my response.

Have you been writing something down and having a conversation with someone and accidentally wrote down what you were saying/what the other person was saying instead of what you meant to write?