Good news I found the neighborhood post. However the wording was very difficult to understand, it would have been much better if you had spelled out neighborhood because I never expected it to be shortened to hood.
Okay, I wrote little notes on this game the second read through. So I feel comfortable placing my vote on VOTE: Spiffeh
I realise that this is an odd choice since I partially read him the first time. However, when I read the game in context I was far less impressed. I think he has gotten by most of the game pushing a really strange read with very little reason. To be fair, I am a tad bias on this one because the scum read started because of a joke. I did not find that itlepip reaction was unusual in any way and I felt like any time he/she (sorry, I did not check), he tried to defend themself or make a comment about why it was silly Spiffeh just kind of tossed it back at him. It struck me as one of those you lose by posting kind of situation. However, I do not feel that itlepip was wrong to commit to it and I also find it strange that the read itself has not been expanded on over time. People linger on that vote but it is little more then saying follow me lynch itlepip.
A few other things that caught my eye was the debate about the miller and whether how that should be handled. In the early phases of the game is the right time to make a choice based on this. I do find the balance kind of strange having a neighbhorhood and a miller. Seems kind of strange because that is like confirming three townies right off the bat. So that is where I draw my question about the claim from. I know that Titus has said a million times not to do that, but bad habits die hard.
Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2015 1:34 pm
by Spiffeh
Could you point to the post where you think I "tossed back at him"?
Sorry this one is the response by itlpip but it has the post I want inside of it. Also this one as well post 262. Since i cannot see a good reason to keep the vote you are implying that there is something else when that post is about maxious rather then the situation you are voting for. Seems like you are keeping light and airy votes rather then reading the people. Almost like you are trying to see how many people you can get to follow you.
Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2015 4:21 pm
by Saki
catchup post
↑Saki wrote:but i don't really see the exchange as TvS, it reads more TvT (esp. "god i hope u are scum" stuff)
i meant SvS, not TvS/TvT
there's no way that notsci/cb are scum together (it's really hard to have improv arguments) but either/or could be scum
↑Antihero wrote:it's the other person who's been acting like a double voter all game
holy fucking shit is that what it was
lol i just noticed the double vote, let alone the....damn
I'm going to wait until this settles down a bit and I look over the thread again to place my vote.
i dont like this for some reason
why unvote at all, its d1
↑Suzune wrote:Ah, I'm sorry I forgot. I have never replaced in as someone who had a vote before. Usually they are voteless so I did not consider.
UNVOTE:
I will place a new vote when I am sure of a new place. I apologize.
checks out.
↑itlepip wrote:Wait, Saki why are you voting Suzune?
what the fuuuck
why
spiffeh did he give any evidence in the neighborhood
↑notscience wrote:Because he's scumreading me while simultaneously not actually reading my posts and passing off a read as gut.
He's not actually reading my posts as I've referred to myself as a knight several times and his post referred to me as a king, which, if you were reading someone's posts closely enough to get a bearing on their alignment and especially if you were trying to divine associative tells from their posting, missing a detail that persisted through the ISO is pretty fucking sketchy.
im pretty sold on this.
↑3dicerolling wrote:what do you feel now about suzune?
again, suzune pressure....
i dont like it, idk why