↑Night Hunters wrote:
Well we got a problem then. Your play boils down to scumread the noons and it's a place town winds up a lot.
I want GL SC or Jeanne ATM.
You didn't answer my question. Does the scum read still come down to his defence of SC? Because I'm not buying the 'broken record' schtick you're trying to sell right now. If you consistently attack someone, they're going to consistently defend themselves.
Can you rephrase that sentence about my play as well? I don't understand it.
↑massive wrote:and BBT is still mistaking "contribution" for actual scumminess.
No, I'm reading your lack of contribution as scummy. I'm not sure how you're missing this.
↑Night Hunters wrote:
SirCakez had a shitty scum trajectory.
~Mom
Walk me through SC's 'scum trajectory' please.
↑ɀefiend wrote:
Who is the scum in this scenario? Aristophanes?
It would be massive. Though I'm doubting it now.
↑Thor665 wrote:
I am disappointed that you are not addressing my reasons for doing so or offering a valid explanation of why the massive wagon is good to lure me back in a proactive manner, and are instead doing this.
Could you sheep me while you try to decide on how to explain your massive case? I promise good things.
You offered no reasons. You're also trying to lynch a claimed PR which is scummy as fuck and I know you'd have the balls to try this shit as scum.
I offered my reasons on massive, you obviously didn't think they were good enough for you to join the wagon.
↑massive wrote:and BBT is still mistaking "contribution" for actual scumminess.
No, I'm reading your lack of contribution as scummy. I'm not sure how you're missing this.
What specifically about MY lack of contribution do you think is alignment-indicative? Why does it only apply to me and not to, say, Jeanne or Aristophanes?
Posted: Wed Mar 09, 2016 9:46 am
by BlueBloodedToffee
↑Night Hunters wrote:
I will keep looking to see what you're getting at since I am pretty sure you're town.
~Mom
What? Why is Thor town?
↑Firebringer wrote:
Kirroha has half a brain, or should I say Radiant Cowballs?
Kirr is an RC alt?
↑Night Hunters wrote:Our kitchen could use renovations. Particularly the countertops.
VOTE: Firebringer
~Mom
What is going on here. This is going to be a rough ride for town if both Thor and Titus are scum.
Posted: Wed Mar 09, 2016 9:47 am
by BlueBloodedToffee
↑massive wrote:
What specifically about MY lack of contribution do you think is alignment-indicative? Why does it only apply to me and not to, say, Jeanne or Aristophanes?
Firstly, your attempt to deflect onto other players is noted.
Secondly, you're much more important for me to gain a read on out of the 3 and I think you know why.
Can you tell me why you're not contributing?
Posted: Wed Mar 09, 2016 9:58 am
by BlueBloodedToffee
↑Thor665 wrote:I am intrigued that as I come in and start a hard push on scum the massive wagon disintegrates and the Cake wagon builds.
Hardly. Massive lost two votes (one of which was yours) and the other vote was from massive to SC. What was your point here?
↑Thor665 wrote:
He's setting himself up as a slot that can do nothing all day, and justify lack of death late game.
Orrrrr, he's setting himself up to be a useless slot so he gets the maximum usage out of his role as scum will consider him as no threat?
Posted: Wed Mar 09, 2016 9:59 am
by BlueBloodedToffee
I'm caught up.
That FB wagon is scummy as fuck. I want to do this;
VOTE: Thor
Posted: Wed Mar 09, 2016 1:29 pm
by SirCakez
VOTE: Kirroha
I think this is a pretty good vote now.
Fire is iffy for me because he always plays like this and it makes him quite hard to read.
Posted: Wed Mar 09, 2016 2:05 pm
by Night Hunters
Titus thinks thor is town for ~reasons~ and it is kinda infuriating.
-Dad
Posted: Wed Mar 09, 2016 2:17 pm
by kirroha
↑Thor665 wrote:I am so frustrated by this sort of stuff, because of the following reasons;
1. It's making me show my hand before he is locked in hard.
2. That gives him more future wiggle room
I'm not completely against voting for a claimed PR day 1, just so you know. But what Fire has hinted about his role so far makes me vaguely feel like his role is somewhat related to mine. Which makes me more inclined to believe his claim at least for now. In any case, he said his role can be proven eventually, so I'm willing to let that slide.
why? Was it not gross when shaddowez voted you or when I voiced a desire to do so as well?
Posted: Wed Mar 09, 2016 5:41 pm
by ɀefiend
Prodging, been hella busy at work but I will catch up with everything tomorrow.
Posted: Wed Mar 09, 2016 7:09 pm
by Aristophanes
Shit, I let this game slip again.
Welcome, Thor! Your name and legend precede you!
Posted: Wed Mar 09, 2016 7:33 pm
by BlueBloodedToffee
Everyone needs to take a minute and consider why they're lynching a claimed PR on D1. They will sort themselves out over time, lynching them D1 is super bad play and anti-town.
why? Was it not gross when shaddowez voted you or when I voiced a desire to do so as well?
shaddowez had some reasons for it even though I'm a claimed PR with a crumbed role and that can just be chalked up to bad town play. SC has no reasons for it whatsoever and sheeped it to high heaven, 2 days before the deadline, which just looks terrible.
↑BlueBloodedToffee wrote:Everyone needs to take a minute and consider why they're lynching a claimed PR on D1. They will sort themselves out over time, lynching them D1 is super bad play and anti-town.
This.
Sure, lynching a claimed PR is possible but it something that everyone has to do after some serious discussion (i.e. way more than 2 days). The fact that SC voted me with 2 days left on the clock looks like he wants to flashwagon a PR which is really anti-town.
Posted: Thu Mar 10, 2016 1:38 am
by Thor665
↑kirroha wrote:But what Fire has hinted about his role so far makes me vaguely feel like his role is somewhat related to mine. Which makes me more inclined to believe his claim at least for now. In any case, he said his role can be proven eventually, so I'm willing to let that slide.
I expressed the hint about his role that I saw - and I don't think it makes it connected to anyone.
Could you at least give me a vague area to look for the hint you're getting? Because I'm not seeing it.
↑BlueBloodedToffee wrote:Everyone needs to take a minute and consider why they're lynching a claimed PR on D1. They will sort themselves out over time, lynching them D1 is super bad play and anti-town.
Did you read my explanation yet?
Because my reasoning is pretty solid, and this PR worship is weak.
Posted: Thu Mar 10, 2016 1:40 am
by BlueBloodedToffee
I did. Lynching a claimed PR is still awful on D1. If they're all still around on D3, then we can start talking.
Not D1. Thry should be left alone D1.
Posted: Thu Mar 10, 2016 2:03 am
by SirCakez
There's like four claimed PRs at this point I think? They definitely can't all be real. And Kirroha is the scummiest of the PR claimers in my opinion.
Posted: Thu Mar 10, 2016 2:14 am
by kirroha
That's not a good reason. So that is enough of a justification for an attempt at flashwagoning me within 2 days? Explain what you were intending to do with that vote, SC.
Posted: Thu Mar 10, 2016 2:18 am
by SirCakez
Vote someone I'm scumreading? All of the wagons have collapsed except massive and I'm not comfortable with that wagon anymore.
Posted: Thu Mar 10, 2016 3:00 am
by kirroha
Meh. I guess that motivation makes sense.
Posted: Thu Mar 10, 2016 3:13 am
by BlueBloodedToffee
Thoughts on Thor SC? Lynching a claimed PR is just awful and the amount of people accepting that it's OK to lynch a PR on D1 is astounding.