Mafiascum.net

Deal breaker

In post 475, Firebringer wrote:Deal breaker

Rule Breaker?

Can I ask everyone to do as I say and not as I do in terms of not pairing with scumreads for the purpose of committing suicide?

But really; "let me pair with somebody I scumread then lolsuicide" isn't exactly a game-breaking plan given the past few times this setup got ran, from my skims.

Oh RC ninja'd me meh.

In post 477, RadiantCowbells wrote:Can I ask everyone to do as I say and not as I do in terms of not pairing with scumreads for the purpose of committing suicide?

You can always ask.

My intent is to pair with Alisae or Penguin; I town read both enough to feel like I can permasort them with some one on one lovely time.

The only reason I'm not flinging the invites already is because how this is developing deserves watching.

Wow, mangled those quote tags.

In post 469, Priscila wrote:Penguin, you say Mint is scummy but it doesn't feel like you've sorted him. Your reads and interactions with Hebichan feel like you're trying to pocket her. Your engagement with me doesn't feel genuine. I don't feel like you're town much anymore.

Let's dance.

Fuck no. Why so upset that I'm scum reading Mint? Pocket the IC? By...what, indicating I'd consider her opinions? And my engagement with you was all of one response to one of your posts. But good to know you can tell genuine-me off of that, heh.

In post 481, Cabd wrote:My intent is to pair with Alisae or Penguin; I town read both enough to feel like I can permasort them with some one on one lovely time.

Just ask penguin out.

You will always regret it if you don't.

In post 472, penguin_alien wrote:My point is that you're hedging. Not commiting to the read but egging it on.

How is saying that I agree with the reads not committing? It's early in the game, I have no hard scumreads - that isn't hedging. You're spinning my content here, that's what doesn't feel genuine.

In post 472, penguin_alien wrote:Why? I'm not town reading you here. What's my motive to tie myself to you?

If you think I might be scum, dance with me to sort me better and solidify that feeling.

In post 472, penguin_alien wrote:...why do you want to pair with someone you're scum reading? Why not let them pair elsewhere and advocate for their lynch?

See above. I thought this was an obvious strategy.

In post 472, penguin_alien wrote:See 377

377 is a shallow assessment of his ISO and doesn't really try to parse his motivation - the same words could be accurately said about you, I think, if I were going to use the same rhetoric. This is pretty null behavior without more of the game to get a feel for things.

In post 472, penguin_alien wrote:What approach is that? Trying to read you?

I don't feel that you are.

Cabd, if you want to dance with Penguin because OOG reasons I'm not going to stop you. But in game I do believe that I am at the very least wary of this because I feel like in general pairs are better at pocketing each other than reading each other.

If you pair with her and declare her locktown I'm not going to follow you off of that read, I've been burned way too many times on that before.

If you think I'm upset you've misread my tone.

In post 486, RadiantCowbells wrote:Cabd, if you want to dance with Penguin because OOG reasons I'm not going to stop you. But in game I do believe that I am at the very least wary of this because I feel like in general pairs are better at pocketing each other than reading each other.

If you pair with her and declare her locktown I'm not going to follow you off of that read, I've been burned way too many times on that before.

I agree with this but I still want them paired because I can't really read either right and if they are Town I think scum would most likely kill them over most pairs here.

I'm just as likely to go for alisae right now but penguin did sign up assuming she would pair with me. So it's her call if I do that or aggressively attacksort alisae.

Ladies first etc

In post 487, Priscila wrote:If you think I'm upset you've misread my tone.

You have a pretty blunt way of putting things which can read as pretty aggressive friendo

In post 490, Firebringer wrote:

In post 487, Priscila wrote:If you think I'm upset you've misread my tone.

You have a pretty blunt way of putting things which can read as pretty aggressive friendo

I don't read anything on the past two pages as aggressive or upset from Priscila so I'm not quite sure what you're referring to here.

In post 470, RadiantCowbells wrote:Fuck off, you're not dancing with someone to commit suicide.

I mean this is the only aggressively worded thing I can find in like the last few pages and it was from me and wasn't really meant aggressively so I'm sort of confused here.

read the posts again?

Unless you're referring to something pre page 17 I have no idea what you're referring to.

Why we talking about this?

I don't see much benefit in pairing with Hebichan or giga personally - Hebichan if I want her to be for sure paired with town but I would prefer to pair with someone I don't townread so that I can get a better read on them and take them out of the game if I end up strongly scumreading them. If we don't have someone that I townread to pair with Hebichan I will go there but I would prefer that Cabd and Penguin don't pair up and the only other person I trust to read Penguin here would be Maxous probably.

In post 496, Priscila wrote:I don't see much benefit in pairing with Hebichan or giga personally - Hebichan if I want her to be for sure paired with town but I would prefer to pair with someone I don't townread so that I can get a better read on them and take them out of the game if I end up strongly scumreading them. If we don't have someone that I townread to pair with Hebichan I will go there but I would prefer that Cabd and Penguin don't pair up and the only other person I trust to read Penguin here would be Maxous probably.

You are more valuable for your obvtown status than your ability to read people in hoods.

How is Priscilla obvtown?

You'll just have to take my word for it.