Posted: Fri Dec 14, 2018 11:15 am
I think Hebi is town
Yeah but I think there both town. They’re both reading town tonally to me.In post 471, CheekyTeeky wrote:They're voting each other though?In post 470, Nancy Drew 39 wrote:Sheep and Varsoon wagons are bad.
It's a weird thought to have though. Their wagons consist of one player apart from them who are your townreads. Did you mean they are bad votes not bad wagons? Bad wagons implies the constituents are scummy to me.In post 476, Nancy Drew 39 wrote:Yeah but I think there both town. They’re both reading town tonally to me.In post 471, CheekyTeeky wrote:They're voting each other though?In post 470, Nancy Drew 39 wrote:Sheep and Varsoon wagons are bad.
Why can't bad wagons be bad town? I expect scum to be more opportunistic than that.In post 477, CheekyTeeky wrote:It's a weird thought to have though. Their wagons consist of one player apart from them who are your townreads. Did you mean they are bad votes not bad wagons? Bad wagons implies the constituents are scummy to me.In post 476, Nancy Drew 39 wrote:Yeah but I think there both town. They’re both reading town tonally to me.In post 471, CheekyTeeky wrote:They're voting each other though?In post 470, Nancy Drew 39 wrote:Sheep and Varsoon wagons are bad.
Yes exactly, Hebi gets it. Bad wagons, because I think they’re both town.In post 479, hebichan wrote:Why can't bad wagons be bad town? I expect scum to be more opportunistic than that.In post 477, CheekyTeeky wrote:It's a weird thought to have though. Their wagons consist of one player apart from them who are your townreads. Did you mean they are bad votes not bad wagons? Bad wagons implies the constituents are scummy to me.In post 476, Nancy Drew 39 wrote:Yeah but I think there both town. They’re both reading town tonally to me.In post 471, CheekyTeeky wrote:They're voting each other though?In post 470, Nancy Drew 39 wrote:Sheep and Varsoon wagons are bad.
Can someone please tell me what “Mfw” means? Kthanx.In post 478, Kokichi Oma wrote:Mfw a wagon is 2 people now
I mean I think Sheep and Varsoon are town here, so any votes on either are probably wrong. Sorry, if this was unclear.In post 477, CheekyTeeky wrote:It's a weird thought to have though. Their wagons consist of one player apart from them who are your townreads. Did you mean they are bad votes not bad wagons? Bad wagons implies the constituents are scummy to me.In post 476, Nancy Drew 39 wrote:Yeah but I think there both town. They’re both reading town tonally to me.In post 471, CheekyTeeky wrote:They're voting each other though?In post 470, Nancy Drew 39 wrote:Sheep and Varsoon wagons are bad.
Oh thanks, there should be a list somewhere with all of the slang and abbreviations.In post 482, hebichan wrote:"My Face When"
But mislynches are most common in early days.In post 374, Gamma Emerald wrote:my problem with waiting for others to contribute is then the more active people clog up the game thread
that's why I advocate for faster early days
You never answered my question.In post 478, Kokichi Oma wrote:Mfw a wagon is 2 people now
What questionIn post 487, Gamma Emerald wrote:You never answered my question.In post 478, Kokichi Oma wrote:Mfw a wagon is 2 people now
???In post 433, Vaxkiller wrote:I'm caught up. Only thing I didn't really like was Varsoon seemingly wanting to lynch within his neighborhood to find scum... seems like something the scum in the neighborhood would want to do.
Wagonomics can meme thier way to the end of the game for all I care
I've seen bothIn post 488, Gamma Emerald wrote:I thought mfw was “my feelings when”
I feel good about him being town. He’s been pretty solvey so far, don’t you think?In post 440, CheekyTeeky wrote:I expect PB to obvtown at some point.
What?In post 443, Leodanny wrote:How so? And what does “appeals the the target” mean?In post 438, Gamma Emerald wrote:Nice post that adds nothing but appeals the the target.In post 415, Leodanny wrote:My hero! Thanks for pointing that out, Ermeralds iso was big so I didn’t read it yet.
@Ausuka I’ll address your post later but I feel like we’re gonna have a problem.
Also stop being a ninja all of you please
I didn’t know you needed to be knowledgeable of the stock market to play Mafia.In post 467, Wagonomics wrote:That is the question of the market right now. I believe LeoCoin very well could be a bubble wagon. In general, I do think investing in a bubble wagon is a bad idea, unless you buy early and then sell before the crash. But that sort of behavior also risks a SEC investigation.In post 445, Gamma Emerald wrote:LeoCoin gathering several investors you are predicting it will depreciate. Do you believe it is a bubble wagon? Do you think investing in a bubble wagon is a bad idea? I personally feel diversifying through the day could be good, in which case investing early into a bubble wagon doesn’t seem like a bother to me.
The depreciation of LeoCoin is not purely a result of his current investors but more his response to my observations about his IPO.
His recent V/LA post also seemed like it might not end up a scum flip or a green flip, but perhaps one of those wild card flips whose value is hard to evaluate.
In the event of a scumflip with some real winners, there is always the chance of an SEC investigation.In post 462, Vaxkiller wrote:Also, scum have insider trading, this is bad.
And that's it for now folks, the Conference Call is coming to an end for today. Thank you for your time and questions
@KokichiIn post 436, Gamma Emerald wrote:Does that not resemble what Dunnstral did in Terror in the City?In post 406, Kokichi Oma wrote:???????? what. this post literally makes 0 sense. LOLIn post 385, Leodanny wrote:So why are you calling me out for not doing things while Kokichi has actually said he hasn’t done anything?In post 345, Kokichi Oma wrote:wth i haven't even done anything so far this game. have i?In post 325, Wagonomics wrote:KokichiCoin has further depreciated in VALUE
VOTE: Kikochi Oma
I dont even remember the play that gameIn post 495, Gamma Emerald wrote:@KokichiIn post 436, Gamma Emerald wrote:Does that not resemble what Dunnstral did in Terror in the City?In post 406, Kokichi Oma wrote:???????? what. this post literally makes 0 sense. LOLIn post 385, Leodanny wrote:So why are you calling me out for not doing things while Kokichi has actually said he hasn’t done anything?In post 345, Kokichi Oma wrote:wth i haven't even done anything so far this game. have i?In post 325, Wagonomics wrote:KokichiCoin has further depreciated in VALUE
VOTE: Kikochi Oma
If Leo is in fact scum here, then I would guess he’s probably being bussed.In post 472, Party Boat wrote:ugh
anyone wanna claim competing jester or some wacky garbage that explains what leo is doing
b/c it sure looks like deliberately playing to get lynched at this point but I'll still kill it unless someone has a better option given how torturous dealing a jester in a no deadlines game would be
I have no idea what this means, which was obviously the intent.In post 486, Kokichi Oma wrote:Ctr when gra and you fla.
This is a really weird vote. Why do you vote Kokichi over Wagonomics here?In post 385, Leodanny wrote:So why are you calling me out for not doing things while Kokichi has actually said he hasn’t done anything?In post 345, Kokichi Oma wrote:wth i haven't even done anything so far this game. have i?In post 325, Wagonomics wrote:KokichiCoin has further depreciated in VALUE
VOTE: Kikochi Oma