Mafiascum.net

In post 466, Irrelephant11 wrote:Mm those aren't bad reasons, actually.

Chara when you get a chance can you explain what exactly about a recently completed game gives you reason to townread fuscezu?

In post 476, Chara wrote:

In post 466, Irrelephant11 wrote:Mm those aren't bad reasons, actually.

Chara when you get a chance can you explain what exactly about a recently completed game gives you reason to townread fuscezu?

going to be busy until the evening, but you can check my larger posts around the end of Forkbomb mafia regarding Fusco.

In post 456, ClearlyClarity wrote:Yeah this is also how I'm feeling about the game rn. I normally don't lurk as much as I have this game as town but the environment of this lobby is completely different from that I've been used to from games I usually am in. Every post I've seen so far feels the same, like I'd read through 5 pages of the game and get absolutely nothing out of it. I'm probably just bad at the game or w/e but I'm entirely lost

In post 422, Fuscezu wrote:Please dont complicate the game rn and try to imagine all manner of wild and crazy roles. We know there's a group of bad guys, and there are good guys...

we should not assume the presence of an sk until we have too many bodies.

we should not assume survivors until somebody starts acting weird and appeasy. Survivors are not anti-town in that they can achieve their wincons whilst we achieve ours. They just arent reliable sucmhunters.

In post 479, Fuscosco wrote:is she honestly saying some (late) input about setup spec ajd maftheory is a good reasonsl to scumspect someone?

In post 479, Fuscosco wrote:is she honestly saying some (late) input about setup spec ajd maftheory is a good reasonsl to scumspect someone?

In post 482, ClearlyClarity wrote:

In post 479, Fuscosco wrote:is she honestly saying some (late) input about setup spec ajd maftheory is a good reasonsl to scumspect someone?

Are you talking about me, or . . .

In post 483, Fuscezu wrote:Not a huge fan of the irrelephant playbyplay


if a townie is well, townie appearing, who's gonna ML them?

In post 467, Irrelephant11 wrote:

In post 427, Fuscezu wrote:ceejayvinoya - null with green garnish
Chara - lightly scum for complete lack of anything
ClearlyClarity - liked the initiative? kind of green
Fuscezu - Devil Snek
insomnia - still weak tr
Irrelephant11 - Hate it, but guttown it. I feel like I shouldnt have to guttown a player like irre
Miss Kobayashi Maru - null. Seems like if they do play they could produce good content
Persivul - percy is never easy to read for me, but id go with nullscum if i had to. When in doubt, burn it out.
RCEnigma - very telling that their biggest post is a setup post about shiinji
Shiidaji - kind of light green? Willing to give their replacement some room.
skitter30 - sneeky breeki player. Dont have a meta and hear their scum game is fire.
Smile - I go back and forth between modest green and light red. Ill wait and see how i feel about them. Helps that March is the main head.
tris - No real read yet.

Disagree on chara - what makes you say this?
what gives ceejay a green garnish?
I have no clue where you're getting expectations of "a player like irre". If you can, please explain what you mean.
Is your read on RCE a scumread?

In post 487, Irrelephant11 wrote:I have no clue where you're getting expectations of "a player like irre". If you can, please explain what you mean.
Is your read on RCE a scumread?

In post 488, Fuscosco wrote:

In post 487, Irrelephant11 wrote:I have no clue where you're getting expectations of "a player like irre". If you can, please explain what you mean.
Is your read on RCE a scumread?

I have a relatively high opinion of you
yes, rce is currently a scumread

In post 487, Irrelephant11 wrote:Disagree on chara - what makes you say this?

In post 487, Irrelephant11 wrote:what gives ceejay a green garnish?

In post 491, Fuscezu wrote:

In post 487, Irrelephant11 wrote:what gives ceejay a green garnish?

A desire to not lynch him today. I think a little encouragement would help him.

In post 417, Fuscezu wrote:

In post 153, skitter30 wrote:not sure scum!tris says this really?

I noticed it last night and its been an allgame thing it seems.

Why do you townhunt using anti-scum tells? idgi it seems kind of wifomy.

In post 427, Fuscezu wrote:RCEnigma - very telling that their biggest post is a setup post about shiinji

In post 432, RCEnigma wrote:Fair. I'm kind of out of sync with this game in particular. Couldn't tell you why and I hope it switches around day 2. At least I'll make an effort to improve my input.

I don't necessarily have a read on you either way and a vote on me based on gut doesn't sway me either way, but I'd probably feel that way as either alignment.

The best way to get content out of me would probably be to force it with a legitimate wagon, preferrably before EOD so I don't get flashlynched without giving my thoughts.

I'm following along with the game so I know what's going on but don't have any strong feelings, I have reason to believe ceejay may be town, I still think CC is town and that's about it.

If the hill I die on is my Shiidaji read directly following rvs then I find it incredibly weak and a probable point for scum to sow doubt. No one's really asked but no I don't really have Shiidaji as town anymore following his absence. Scumreading him on an activity rep out feels dumb though.

Oh insomnia is probably town as well, he would be my Fringe read however.

In post 435, Irrelephant11 wrote:Quick caveat about CJ: I've seen him in the LHF seat before I think. I'd suggest we double check his meta on this before lynching

In post 440, Chara wrote:Smile: weak townread, if they're scum i think they're doing a good job with having multiple heads show little stress.