Posted: Thu Mar 19, 2020 1:34 am
Yes! I knew Luca would, I knew it!
MafiaIn post 472, Ame wrote:Where would you place shopping, reading a book, and going to an amusement park on that list?
The way you speak is so similar to me it's uncanny reading your posts sometimes.
I don't have aphantasia. I'm in cognitive neuroscience and visualization is something I'm particularly interested in. Do you mind if I ask you some stuff later?
In post 285, Ame wrote: @Taly
1. How do you find Yshtola's Fuzzy vote suspicious? She didn't need reasoning because she was just wagoning with you as requested. It's weird to me that you kept pressing her for reasoning when it was obvious she had none.
2. How had I not posted anything BUT fluff up until now? This is really weird. Like all my opening posts were non-game related and being silly. And the only game-related thing I really posted was a naked read list with no elaboration.
In post 290, popsofctown wrote:No one has PTs with just the town aligned players, so why are attempts at deception necessarily targeted at other townies and not the mafia?
VOTE: Robbnva for a potential perspective slip.
I also have a post restriction to my role, but it doesn't trigger unless Y'shtola votes me.
This was asked 3 times whileIn post 374, Ame wrote:pops do you have a posting restriction?
This was a lot of very little, any thoughts aside from just one person?In post 388, TheFuzzylogic99 wrote:Yeah,I meant post dodge but my brain froze- ugh
I don't get Paragons post restriction bit as it has been confirmed that Post restrictions are non-normal. So either he either doing it for fun or he has a role that requires him to lie.
Either seems likely at this point. Speaking of Paragon if he flips town then I would bet that there is at least one scum maybe two on that wagon. I am not if any scum might be bussing as it a hard thing to tell early in the game. There seems to be quite a few jumping on the Paragon wagon with no to little reason which makes me a bit nervous about his wagon
I played with the Great Boon last game.....It was very entertaining, I can confirm that he does all those things.
Oh ok- I played Rob . Played against his alt Wimpy and Jake from state farm. Been a while though so I don't remember much about his playstyle
I'm done with anything regarding roles, I don't how the fuck we got to discussing claims when nobody entered L1 at least.In post 396, eyestott wrote:Someone please engage with me in a way where I can treat this like a NORMAL game of mafia
I wanna have a conversation with someone and develop some townreads. I think my mind needs calibration because right now I don’t think I’m actually townreading anyone
How did you conclude this?In post 433, Yshtola Rhul wrote:Pops is joking.In post 429, eyestott wrote:Am I going crazy? How on earth is it that TWO SEPARATE PEOPLE are claiming posting restrictions in a normal game?
It can’t be a coincidence can it?
Pedit: I give up. VOTE: Popsofctown
Will remove my vote once Yshtola votes Beyoncé here
Paragon is pretending that his self-imposed restriction is official.
It is as simple as that.
wtfpopsofctown wrote:Did two people replace out because I fake claimed a post restriction? I just don't understand
If I didn't follow my questioning quota, I would be punished in my heart, and that aloneIn post 409, eyestott wrote:And Paragon, would you be restricted from posting a question if you have no points in your question quota?
Or would you be punished in some way if you try to do so?
So this is a self imposed post restriction?In post 487, Paragon wrote:If I didn't follow my questioning quota, I would be punished in my heart, and that aloneIn post 409, eyestott wrote:And Paragon, would you be restricted from posting a question if you have no points in your question quota?
Or would you be punished in some way if you try to do so?
7
IC= innocent child?In post 486, popsofctown wrote:most of what I accomplished the last few pages is making eyestott an IC you should be proud. Please spray a bubblebeam of celebration
I've never seen this concept played but I can imagine it, still, feels like there's multiple unknown variables there.popsofctown wrote:The perspective slip thing with Rob is the idea that scum!Rob posts in the scum PT, "This is obviously fake, don't be fooled by this" (or more likely knows the personality of his teammates and doesn't have to), knows for certain the townie's lie has fully nullified impact on town, and then proceeds to go, "you are deceiving exclusively town, shame on you", slipping knowledge he shouldn't have about whether mafia was deceived. (after losing a large theme because a cop fake claimed in a way that kept me from nightkilling him I have nothing but eyerolls for the notion that it's never useful to try to deceive the mafia.)
I think the slot is somewhat townier than null now for other reasons.
Is this supposed to change my read on you?In post 486, popsofctown wrote:most of what I accomplished the last few pages is making eyestott an IC you should be proud. Please spray a bubblebeam of celebration
I dislike this post and the rest of the stances Rabid is taking. It seems he has taken the easy stance of lynching pops and I for these shenanigans when a reasonable person would consider them NAI. It's easy to push and means he doesn't need to comment on other matters in the game.In post 432, Rabid Schnauzer wrote:Yes. They do NOT have post restrictions. Mod has confirmed this. They're likely scum doubling down. If town, they're allowing scum to hide and will be a major liability in lylo. Lynching them is basic play which unfortunately towns have gotten away from.In post 420, eyestott wrote:Are you talking about Paragon and pops?
If someone asked for my opinion, I would be inclined to agree with this post.In post 452, popsofctown wrote:I am still baffled about my joking being displeasurable or upsetting
I have trouble feeling guilty about RS's replaceout if it possibly has some correlation to rolling red here. I also have trouble feeling guilty about not following normative "culture" practices of player for someone who has broken written site rules twice in their replaceout procedure
Gimmicks are NAI, I believe.In post 491, eyestott wrote:NAI?
Anything from the information I gave you. Your reads, my reads, the past several pages, people you want wagoned/lynched, how you feel about the fakeclaims etc.In post 493, eyestott wrote:Oh Taly, i saw a response but I didn’t see an attempt to engage! Even looking back I’m not sure what you want to talk about, could you clarify?