Mafiascum.net

In post 64, humaneatingmonkey wrote:Your tone and your process feel off and how you got tame so fast after you got the spotlight makes me rub my chin.

In post 99, humaneatingmonkey wrote:Lucky does not look good under pressure. Does anyone feel like he's town?
I don't know if I'm tunnelling or not, but he says he's got no reason to change his votes — yet he scumreads InWho22 and doesn't vote him.

I guess I see where you're coming from. The first quote could apply to both Lucky and 3bounty. With the second quote, neither Lucky nor 3bounty looked good under pressure, and you did have a point when you brought up that Lucky scum read 3bounty yet voted me, which is apparently something he has done before. In my interactions with Lucky, though, I just didn't get the feeling that he was coming from a place of scum.

Clidd -- Personally, I would prefer Jeremy Brett over Benedict Cumberbatch this game.

In post 476, Aloratom wrote:Clidd -- Personally, I would prefer Jeremy Brett over Benedict Cumberbatch this game.

And thank you for repping in.

In post 474, clidd wrote:Game state summary, please ?

Latest vote count is post 461 if that helps.

In post 476, Aloratom wrote:Clidd -- Personally, I would prefer Jeremy Brett over Benedict Cumberbatch this game.

I will think about your request.

In post 477, Aloratom wrote:

In post 476, Aloratom wrote:Clidd -- Personally, I would prefer Jeremy Brett over Benedict Cumberbatch this game.

And thank you for repping in.

I appreciate the sympathy. I'll be able to read the game probably in 3~4 hours, when I'm at home, so if you can describe to me how the wagons formed in the meantime, it will be of great help.

In post 478, 3bounty wrote:

In post 474, clidd wrote:Game state summary, please ?

Latest vote count is post 461 if that helps.

I said in the sense of discriminating the important events in the game. Example: .

In post 469, InWho22 wrote:@Peaches: If you aren't going to participate, I would recommend you ask for a replacement and find another game when you have the time for it.

/sehat

Asking another player to replace out of the game is explicitly against site rules. Please refrain from doing so

In post 473, clidd wrote:

clidd is now confscum, this is classic scum posting :3

Thanks for taking the slot clidd. It's day 1 so not sure what you want from gamestate

I scumread your predecessor for prodging

3b self-declared himself a parity cop with a difference check on 3b and aloratom, but I am skeptical

The other important question of the day is how much meming is a townie amount of meming for holden. This is srs bsns

Oh yeah and hef thinks ll is scum but I kinda don't remember why

In post 482, Kirari Momobami wrote:

In post 469, InWho22 wrote:@Peaches: If you aren't going to participate, I would recommend you ask for a replacement and find another game when you have the time for it.

/sehat

Asking another player to replace out of the game is explicitly against site rules. Please refrain from doing so

Sorry, didn't know.
Also hey clidd

In post 484, Kirari Momobami wrote:I scumread your predecessor for prodging

3b self-declared himself a parity cop with a difference check on 3b and aloratom, but I am skeptical

The other important question of the day is how much meming is a townie amount of meming for holden. This is srs bsns

I what?

In post 469, InWho22 wrote:@Peaches: If you aren't going to participate, I would recommend you ask for a replacement and find another game when you have the time for it.

In post 474, clidd wrote:Game state summary, please ?

i think it's better if you just go in without any instructions from us

In post 475, Aloratom wrote:In my interactions with Lucky, though, I just didn't get the feeling that he was coming from a place of scum.

I'm always interested to hear why.

In post 490, humaneatingmonkey wrote:

In post 475, Aloratom wrote:In my interactions with Lucky, though, I just didn't get the feeling that he was coming from a place of scum.

I'm always interested to hear why.

It wasn't anything objective. It was just a feeling.

In post 345, 3bounty wrote:VOTE: Aloratom last post day 1. Lynch me or Alo, I'm done giving him the benefit of the doubt.

Posts like this fall under the umbrella of slayer's gambit. You didn't actually fake a guilty on alo, but tonally it's quite similar (hence joke about parity cop)

Slayer's gambit -- town fakeclaiming cop to get their preferred lynch, hoping their fake guilty hits scum but not actually knowing

you're townreading that, Kirari?

Not really, no. I voted him in response to the post, remember?

Although I would say that type of post comes from over-aggressive town slightly more than scum

but not like, never scum, or even uncommon scum