Mafiascum.net

In post 411, DkKoba wrote:self

btw proof I said I would "seppuku"

nice try pooky!

very good pagetop.

In post 474, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:

In post 471, DkKoba wrote:Why is your current proposition all town bud? Why are YOU town?

I'm town cuz my role pm says so


I was actually worrying about my coalition last night cuz it seemed to be cruising along a bit too fine

now watching you try to desperately bang your way into the party like a madman got me feeling pretty good about my coalition.

tHeRE iS ReSisTaNCE sO iT MuSt bE RigHt

In post 472, DkKoba wrote:MY PRONOUNS ARE THEY THEM STOP USING HE HIM

it's hard to substitute pronouns

i got most of them right but missed like 2 at the end- don't pretend to be angry if you really cared you would've noticed like 90% of my pronoun use was right and I just missed a few at the end.

just fake anger manufactured because the case against is air-tight.

In post 475, DkKoba wrote:

In post 411, DkKoba wrote:self

btw proof I said I would "seppuku"

nice try pooky!

i keep forgetting that quoting after using ctrl F makes it so that only the highlighted word shows up in the quote for some reason but yall are able to click the post number

I didn't say you didn't say you would seppuku

your case has more holes than swiss cheese and I already exposed a gaping one. stop trying to gaslight u scum piece of shit

LMAOOO

if ur town take pooky off your coalition right now. there is no way this kid is town.

I'm getting off before I post anything worse.

I will be back in about an hour.

In post 481, DkKoba wrote:your case has more holes than swiss cheese and I already exposed a gaping one. stop trying to gaslight u scum piece of shit

which one?

point it out

you're just flailing at this point

is this another tvt?

right now Koba's desperately trying to find a hole in my argument, they are pretending they are so "angry" that they have to take an hour off to "cool off"

This type of emotional appeal is pretty pathetic tbh. Bush league stuff. You're scum, you lost, just accept it and move on to the next game. At least this will be faster than all those town games you lost in a row.

In post 485, SleeperSoul wrote:

is this another tvt?

Do you think Pooky's push on me is Town?

In post 487, DkKoba wrote:Do you think Pooky's push on me is Town?

show me the holes

In post 484, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:

In post 481, DkKoba wrote:your case has more holes than swiss cheese and I already exposed a gaping one. stop trying to gaslight u scum piece of shit

which one?

point it out

you're just flailing at this point

have anything else other than "zomg ur flailing" as to why your current coalition suggestion is good?

would you as town sit back and let a coalition happen without yourself on it happen without fighting it? because I'm more suspicious of people who are not concered with getting on the coalition right now with my belief that scum is already on it with 0 pressure before I came in.

I like how you said my case had more holes than swiss chess but now can't point a single one out after half hour of looking

In post 489, DkKoba wrote:would you as town sit back and let a coalition happen without yourself on it happen without fighting it? because I'm more suspicious of people who are not concered with getting on the coalition right now with my belief that scum is already on it with 0 pressure before I came in.

False Dilemma

My case against you has to do with how you tried to get on the Coalition - not that you tried to get on the Coalition in the first place.

Your push is saying that me wanting to swap out more than half the coalition is scummy. Yet you do so without analyzing the slots that I suggested.

Instead you just brush it aside as "zomg you want to swap more than just me ur totally only scumread"

I've already experienced multiple players who are stubborn and bad who latch onto dumb shit like this so I can't say that you are even scum for this. but it most definitely makes me not want you on the coalition.


Why is it Town that wants to only 1v1 a slot to get into a coalition instead of showing preference to their own reads?

what point is it to get onto a c oalition only to go against ur own reads and then have it fail. seems like easy scum thing to do and then blame it on it being "not your full idea" of the coalition.


I find it odd that you do argue this point.

I noticed someone earlier noted that they were "townhunting"

I am not doing this. I am scumhunting. and I am using that to create a PoE.

As for your jab at me losing multiple games in a row, I'm still learning site meta and it takes me longer to reach conclusions I'm able to make faster in chat mafia, so excuse me. Also I have shown clear progression throughout my last 2 games. (plus I have yet to be allowed into a LYLO on this site, which is when I am able to shine.) If you cared to read those games more thoroughly, you can see my accuracy does improve over time.

Anyways, I am asking you to stop gaslighting and to explain your reads on the slots you DO have in your coalition because just because I am fighting to be on it does not mean your coalition is correct. If your coalition is wrong you are just setting yourself up for a D1 hanging should you be on it and I am not on it.

i was not looking for the past half hour. I was away from my computer cooling off like I said I was.

you called my case full of holes like swiss cheese and you already exposed a gaping one. I'm still waiting for it.

I'm still waiting on your case on why your coalition submission is correct.

Your assumption is that I am scum because i oppose the current leading coalition hard. Assuming automatically i am scum without any analysis. I already explain i dont feel comfortable with multiple slots on the Coalition. If you feel so confident about it then you should have a good argment for it instead of this circular logic.

In post 440, SleeperSoul wrote:

In post 438, DkKoba wrote:

In post 435, SleeperSoul wrote:

In post 430, Tuxedo Mask wrote:Sleeper: I think they're town, just tonally. They're certainly being heavily influenced by other people's reads which they did last game. But I am pinged by them saying I feel tonally different. The post they clipped was a joke about me saying it sucks I'm so easily pocketed, and they seemed to think I was an angry townie enough that game because they sent me an apology thinking they had pissed me off.

In post 434, Tuxedo Mask wrote:My current tin foil hat is scum Votato and Bear are just pocketing Sleeper again.

I would be more inclined to believe your tinfoil theory if you had acknowledged that you are/can be feeling different this game as town. But I do think it's a towny statement. Still 50/50 on you.

Is it a Town or a Scum statement.

the statement is town but scum can also make town statements to NAI

Ok sleeper but is it town in this context. It stood out to you.

In post 415, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:

In post 411, DkKoba wrote:if my coalition is wrong I will self

+ you shaded me here. Wanna elaborate on who is scum in my coalition?

In post 496, DkKoba wrote:Your assumption is that I am scum because i oppose the current leading coalition hard. Assuming automatically i am scum without any analysis. I already explain i dont feel comfortable with multiple slots on the Coalition. If you feel so confident about it then you should have a good argment for it instead of this circular logic.

that's not what I said