Mafiascum.net

In post 388, notscience wrote:@hoops his level of engagement with the game. As bob said he is taking stances way earlier than normal and I take it as a town trying to be better d1.

is this about me?

In post 431, notscience wrote:@Gera- I'd appreciate your support on the dunn wagon.

.

i'll try at some point to look over Dunn's posts and see what I think.
i'l be shocked if they have done anything where I want to vote for them though.

In post 432, Fredrick A Campbell wrote:

Replacement for Sujimichi replaces Sujimichi

this may be the greatest post I have ever seen in a game of mafia

In post 436, Replacement for Sujimichi wrote:It alarms me that the mod has made 21 votecounts. Could this be indicating there are some special mechanics in play relevant to voting mechancis? Maybe a double or triple voter, or someone needing twice as many votes to be lynched.

urgh, what a terrible post

In post 444, Hoopla wrote:

In post 442, notscience wrote:What I want most of all is a dunn wagon right now- would you be interested in partaking or sharing thoughts on his recent assertion about peoples reads changing based on his?

here is where we have commonground.

geraintm's wagon is at feverpitch. i can sense it. i can

feel

it. i don't want to abandon my post yet - especially given he has been quite responsive to pressure.

consider myself spiritually on the dunn wagon. i give it my stamp of approval.

have I been responsive? I feel I have been sitting here doing not much the whole game, and that hasn't changed

In post 448, Galron wrote:Not feeling geraintm like I was after skimming today's action. UNVOTE: all

Will catch up tomorrow.

hmmm, it felt like an opportunistic vote on me in the first place. and you are slidng off now too. let me say I find that less townie than the average person here

In post 449, UnaBombaH wrote: I often get underestimated by scum, so I'm very rarely nightkilled, and often pushed for as a lynch either early early, or in LyLo.

I often get correctly estimated by scum, so I am very rarely nightkilled

In post 470, Bellaphant wrote:I remember playing with dun years back when I (and he) were fairly new and being impressed, so I guess I'm also reading the slot through 'this isn't what I expect'.

Klick is a cuddle sober, tbf. He's generally happy and giggly drunk, but I'm wondering if the wine got him out of his head enough to post more naturally.

We played in 3 games together 3 years back and I was anti-town in all of them

In post 475, geraintm wrote:

In post 388, notscience wrote:@hoops his level of engagement with the game. As bob said he is taking stances way earlier than normal and I take it as a town trying to be better d1.

is this about me?

Yes

In post 483, notscience wrote:

In post 475, geraintm wrote:

In post 388, notscience wrote:@hoops his level of engagement with the game. As bob said he is taking stances way earlier than normal and I take it as a town trying to be better d1.

is this about me?

Yes

I am not consciously trying to be better. I haven't been so aggressive in "Day 1 sucks" in this game as I was before, but I still think it does and have been quoting posts when I think people have been overreaching same as before.

And now you’re arguing against the one person defending you about his read on you

Which is a towntell

Arguing against my read on you

In post 58, Klick wrote:

In post 29, Isis wrote:don't worry i'm probably going to townread your avatar however you play this game notscience

This is relatable

This has caught my attention. I would disagree with the assessment that Peko was anything close to a "best" character in that game. Surely there are at least 8 or 9 characters ahead of her.

I have my eye on both Isis and Klick.

You’re entitled to your wrong opinion you hiyoko apologist

I enjoyed Hoopla's early take on Dunnstral's vote opportunism, and enjoyed Klick's early take on Bella's disconnect between her thoughts and what she's pushing with her vote. Popo's case in 84 feels a little forced. Alright then, I am up to page 5 in record time and am making fantastic progress. I will pick this up again later.

I scrolled up to the top of this page and was shocked to see that I couldn't find a single votecount in sight. Pick up the pace, Fredrick; what are we even paying you for?

VOTE: popo

In post 488, notscience wrote:You’re entitled to your wrong opinion you hiyoko apologist

You spelled Nagito and Ibuki wrong.

Popo is a fine vote and nagito did nothing wrong

Thank you, Fredrick. My faith has been restored and the daily instalments will resume.

In post 480, geraintm wrote:

In post 448, Galron wrote:Not feeling geraintm like I was after skimming today's action. UNVOTE: all

Will catch up tomorrow.

hmmm, it felt like an opportunistic vote on me in the first place. and you are slidng off now too. let me say I find that less townie than the average person here

I haven't decided if this is scummy or if you're just taunting me.

In post 431, notscience wrote:@Gera- I'd appreciate your support on the dunn wagon.

Klick, Hoops are more than welcome too as is Una.

so, I looked over Dunn.

there is a bunch of votes being thrown around,
bob
una
bella

and some itching to join other wagons too, some posts saying people are scum. I think between those and their votes over half the town has been scum at some point.

like....I don't like Dunn at all. but I find it hard to believe scum would be this bad, it is just too obvious.
I think i'd rather keep them alive until day 2, I think I would learn more about their place in the game with them placing more and more votes.
does that make sense?

In post 494, Galron wrote:

In post 480, geraintm wrote:

In post 448, Galron wrote:Not feeling geraintm like I was after skimming today's action. UNVOTE: all

Will catch up tomorrow.

hmmm, it felt like an opportunistic vote on me in the first place. and you are slidng off now too. let me say I find that less townie than the average person here

I haven't decided if this is scummy or if you're just taunting me.

well, it isn't scummy....

In post 473, geraintm wrote:I hate people making grand statements about the game Day 1, because you just don't have the info. so that was why I thought it was a bad post. and then youcame along and said it was a good post

I hardly think it was a grand statement just a read and a little case based on early posts that felt off

blatant misrep by geraintm

In post 497, popopopopopopo wrote:

In post 473, geraintm wrote:I hate people making grand statements about the game Day 1, because you just don't have the info. so that was why I thought it was a bad post. and then youcame along and said it was a good post

I hardly think it was a grand statement just a read and a little case based on early posts that felt off

I said you were clutching at straws. I stand by that. I don't think I said your post was a grandstatement, but fits in with people making overconfident statements about other people way, way too early in the game.

my conversation with hoopla was me saying it was awkward that they read the same post as I had of yours and they thought it was good.

not sure who I have misrepresented though. you? I said you overreached with your post, and I stand by that view.