Posted: Thu Sep 03, 2020 5:41 pm
Who's my model?
ehhh i have an answer but don't want to say anything yet, sorry. want to see other reponses.In post 474, Servant Alter Ego wrote:What do you think of Moon Cancer's approach to the game right now. What do you make of their strategy for using the master-upgrade vote?
Fair enough. Anything you do want to discuss?In post 476, Servant Assassin wrote:ehhh i have an answer but don't want to say anything yet, sorry. want to see other reponses.In post 474, Servant Alter Ego wrote:What do you think of Moon Cancer's approach to the game right now. What do you make of their strategy for using the master-upgrade vote?
Here's my response: Moon Cancer is giving me moon cancer.In post 476, Servant Assassin wrote:ehhh i have an answer but don't want to say anything yet, sorry. want to see other reponses.In post 474, Servant Alter Ego wrote:What do you think of Moon Cancer's approach to the game right now. What do you make of their strategy for using the master-upgrade vote?
In post 475, Servant Moon Cancer wrote:Who's my model?
In post 479, Servant Moon Cancer wrote:One of those games should probably go down in a list of the worst games in the history of ever.
To even suggest reading it makes me think you're a sociopath.
Why? I get pre flip associations but a day 1 town block isn't set in stone.In post 434, Servant Berserker wrote:Avenger is the only person I am comfortable voting for. Also, town blocking here before a flip is.... Bad. Very bad.
Siri. Remind me I'm Fos'ing this post.In post 400, Servant Avenger wrote:In post 234, Servant Moon Cancer wrote:So, my Noble Phantasm ability is somewhat negative utility. But I'm guessing there are players with who I have some compatibility. When it's fully charged, I can use it during the day and anyone voting me at that time has one charge taken away. I get a list of their attributes but not who has what (unless I have a master, then I learn what each of them got). Knowing attributes has no relation to the rest of my role though, so as for why that's my Noble Phantasm I really don't know. As a side note,I was told votes against the town master won't be processed (when I asked Cabd about this, he said it'd count as an unvote at best).
.pain to do this on tablet.In post 342, Servant Moon Cancer wrote:Uh, to avoid any sort of future complication I feel I should correct this miscommunication.In post 331, Servant Avenger wrote:@cancer don’t elaborate on that.I meant no votes from anyone towards an. (electedtown master count (and how that interacts with my Noble Phantasm is paramount). As I think I previously noted, my Noble Phantasm requires me being votedI don't currently plan on actually using it, but the topic came up when I asked Cabd about abusing it.)
A. He said he can drain NP gauges using his NP when voted. Plus attributes etc.
B. Asks cabd if he can vote confirmed town with his ability.
1. He’s right there’s synergy here with foreigner obviously. There’s been no outreach from him to foreigner which I think is a bit odd. The question is whether they’re both town or whether cabd made it that it looks that way but they’re both different alignments or scum together. My Intuition says they’re both different alignments. But obviously there could be 2 or 3 other roles depending on similar information in ounno.
He’s been hilariously transparent, but I have no idea what benefit there would be as town to want to vote confirmed town in what sounds like a separate ability unless he asked cabd if he could drain the NP from confirmed town which is scum motivation, right?
They are being deliberately annoying. Is it any wonder the response is annoyance?In post 482, Servant Ruler wrote:Moon cancer being attacked on the premise they are attempting to solve with an alternate method using the knowledge they have available is looking sketchy.
The post you replied to was MY reading list for the next couple of days. I'm not through digging, but I'll maybe have some observations about the game designs tonight or early tomorrow, depending on how bad my game-insomnia gets.In post 479, Servant Moon Cancer wrote:One of those games should probably go down in a list of the worst games in the history of ever.
To even suggest reading it makes me think you're a sociopath.
In post 255, Servant Saber wrote:Also, for what it's worth, my least favorite people so far are Archer, Lancer, and Rider, since I feel like they have the worst signal-to-noise ratios so far.
Idk how to really explain it, but it seems like there wasn't really any reason to say it. Felt more showy to me.In post 472, Servant Assassin wrote:y, tho?In post 469, Servant Archer wrote:This sounds like something scum would say.In post 462, Servant Moon Cancer wrote:I've been debating whether I should break the spirit of the game and do a meta-dive on you to figure out whether my issues have any substance to them. I don't know if I'll actually bother.
This was meant for Ruler, not Shielder. OOPS!In post 488, Servant Alter Ego wrote: @Shielder
When I saw you'd made some posts I figured I'd have some new questions for you, but I don't, at least not on these posts. You set sail with your second post in the game, and have hewed close to that course ever since. This is an observation, not a criticism!
Does this opinion still hold?
In post 255, Servant Saber wrote:Also, for what it's worth, my least favorite people so far are Archer, Lancer, and Rider, since I feel like they have the worst signal-to-noise ratios so far.
what changed from last nightIn post 493, Servant Moon Cancer wrote:I don't actually currently think Assassin is scum (though I actually don't mind still electing Assassin).
Archer, Shielder, Rider, someone... probably. Working on it.
you seemed fairly committed so i'm wondering why there was a turnaroundIn post 496, Servant Moon Cancer wrote:My read on you?
If you mean my predecessors second post, no. I don't find zerker townie really. I'm not sure what they say that caused them to bemoan the lack of votes.In post 490, Servant Alter Ego wrote:This was meant for Ruler, not Shielder. OOPS!In post 488, Servant Alter Ego wrote: @Shielder
When I saw you'd made some posts I figured I'd have some new questions for you, but I don't, at least not on these posts. You set sail with your second post in the game, and have hewed close to that course ever since. This is an observation, not a criticism!
Does this opinion still hold?
In post 255, Servant Saber wrote:Also, for what it's worth, my least favorite people so far are Archer, Lancer, and Rider, since I feel like they have the worst signal-to-noise ratios so far.
---------------------
I may be wrong, but I get the feel that some players would like to end this phase pretty soon and move on. I don't think we'll need to run out the clock, but in an activity-restricted game I hate to give up pages.
Some of y'all could poast more.