Posted: Fri Oct 09, 2020 12:57 pm
I'm looking at this source-wise: https://www.theverge.com/2020/3/31/2119 ... self-bread
This yeast also doesn't work for many types of bread
This yeast also doesn't work for many types of bread
You don't need yeast in your air. The kinds of yeast that eat wheat are in your bag of flour. Humidity doesn't really factor in. Dampen a towel and throw it over the starter/dough. Worst case, a completely acceptable temperature can be obtained by turning the light on in your oven if it's too cold everywhere else in your kitchen. I have a friend in Nebraska who wakes up his starter with the oven light.In post 474, SirCakez wrote:But not everyone has the space and conditions to do this. You need certain humidity levels + certain warmth levels + levels of yeast in your air. It's not just a given that the correct microbes are in your kitchen.In post 471, fferyllt wrote:If all that were involved, maybe.In post 470, SirCakez wrote:But that has an opportunity cost of time of growing microbes + time of finding the land to grow grains on and/or the monetary cost of getting access to said land
Does that outweigh the convenience of grocery-store yeast?
Any old sack of flour contains yeast. And lactobacillus floats around in your kitchen. Water, flour, a warmish place in the kitchen, some benign neglect, and stand back, you're a microbe rancher.
Also, the bread is far superior in taste to bread made with commercial yeast.
This bread does taste better but it's much trickier to pull off. Your average bread baker is not gonna be able to pull this off and won't have the interest in doing so.
You could counterargue this with people are trying new things because of spare time in quarantine but that's not really holding true anymore, people have gotten apathetic and moved on.
Possibly of interest: https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=50&t=73915, iso me.In post 475, SirCakez wrote:I'm looking at this source-wise: https://www.theverge.com/2020/3/31/2119 ... self-bread
This yeast also doesn't work for many types of bread
under what circumstances do you think it happens, then?In post 482, midwaybear wrote:I really don't think this happens naturally but I could be wrong.
I was definitely expecting Cakez to respond to this comment.
What did I miss while talking about bread?In post 484, midwaybear wrote:I find it somewhat weird that two players choose to have a completely unrelated conversation while ignoring the rest of the thread. I suppose the fact that they BOTH choose to be like this goes against my initial thoughts though. I guess I'll look at this as NAI, but it's just a bit off ya feel?
So did I! Or I wouldn't have talked boulangerie with him.
Ye ye. I think that is my final takeaway even if it didn't help with my reads.In post 488, Tammy wrote:It happens sometimes.
Damnit I'm about to have a red wine vinegar and maple syrup poached salmon with wild mushroom couscous and a side of peas and carrots boiled with chicken bouillon and have this really strong urge to self voteIn post 490, fferyllt wrote:preemptive: FOOD TELL!
nope, I don't think that doing weird stuff is more likely to be from scum in general.In post 484, midwaybear wrote:I guess I'll look at this as NAI, but it's just a bit off ya feel?
I don’t get called mechanical (though I think the proper term for good clarity is “robotic”) often, but I think it’s happened once or twice. For this game though, I think some key factors are a) I came into this game already a little on tilt, so I’m probably going to sound off starting out no matter what, but I’m addition b) I’m posting in a way that makes me think out my posts more. I actually did this in a previous FG game (the first anon dance) but the problem I had there was I was doing that while posting on a secret alt, thus making posting in the game take jumping through a few hoops, which in turn made it near impossible to keep up. Here I don’t have as much burden on me, plus the posting adjustment is for now exclusive to catch up posts and anything I feel is derived from them enough to call for it. So while I’m not fully into this game I’m not out of it either.In post 453, Syryana wrote:I mean you can answer now if you like.
yeah, I changed my mind about that.In post 493, Something_Smart wrote:nope, I don't think that doing weird stuff is more likely to be from scum in general.
I didn’t see a response to my question specifically asking what the post you thought was scummy was, but this makes it clear enough. The thing is, I had at least one thing I personally felt was a loose end I might want to tie up. In addition I wanted to see if anyone had questions for me based on the partial catchup I had already posted, so I could quickly address them before getting into more catching up, as I tend to get distracted from catching up by current events, especially when people are responding to my catchup, so I wanted to try to set aside time to handle those things separately.In post 456, petapan wrote:since i'm unlikely to get more from gamma now: you think so? i hadn't liked his catchup posts at all and the post before raised a flag for me with him asking if there's anything he should respond to, but i tend to take that type of emotive response to an early accusation to be town-indicativeIn post 435, SirCakez wrote:hmmmm no me gusta muchoIn post 432, Gamma Emerald wrote:I am NOT in any sort of mood to deal with bullshit. Give a functional answer.
seems kinda faked
I believe so. I was Gent 1 regardless of the game (although in the second one I replaced in)In post 495, Tammy wrote:Gamma was that the anon game I was in? If so, Which person were you?