Posted: Tue Dec 01, 2020 4:48 pm
Yeah, I'm not scumreading or townreadingIn post 471, Gamma Emerald wrote:Is that scummy? I said I’d do it in the sign ups so it’d be neutral to do.
you
for it. But TGP had their role PM when they posted.Yeah, I'm not scumreading or townreadingIn post 471, Gamma Emerald wrote:Is that scummy? I said I’d do it in the sign ups so it’d be neutral to do.
Yeah when I proposed the buddy system I wasn’t factoring in that scum had a vanilla NK tooIn post 201, Alisae wrote:I think allowing the opportunity for scum to get an extra kill is important
we also shouldn't be sending anyone that's too important if we do try to create opportunities for scum to kill. Town can benefit off of a townie that needs to be sorted dieing.
I'm not sure on this though.
I mean, I think it's +scum but not like some huge thing.In post 478, Gamma Emerald wrote:Both alignments don’t wanna get limmed. Why’s scum more likely to snap that up?
I like you’re trying to sort it though.
Because Flea did it after.In post 481, Gamma Emerald wrote:Why didn’t you press Flea on the vote, Akarin?In post 210, Flea The Magician wrote:
How do YOU know what scum wants? Also we want SCUM to take tasks, not town, so suggesting obvtown take them is a horrible move.In post 229, OutWorldER wrote:VOTE: Pooky
Pooky/Alisae are scum.
Immediately trying to get town to divulge all the information scum could possibly want, pushing NE's so they don't have to face any possible pressure, and distracting town away from actual scumhunting with our alternate win condition.
All of this is a favorable game-state for scum, not town. Town should want the locations they have to go to be secret so that scum can't plan where they're going without making reads (outside of circumstances were Town should want to team up with other Town in a hood.) Town should want scum elims for obvious reasons AND to reduce likelihood of the big scary extra kill. Town will still want regular elims for the reasons we always want regular elims. Tasks become distributable anyways when they die and we can push the public tasks to people who are widely TR'd and already going to the same location (which would be a scenario we'd actually want to have people claiming tasks.)
Thank you for coming to my TED talk. Please stop falling for scum ploys to give them a favorable gamestate.
Flea did a big catchup post, if they really cared about getting the pass from you that much they could have just made that joke before doing it.In post 486, Gamma Emerald wrote:Flea had the same intent. Why is it deifferent if it comes after? That seems a bit dishonest to push one and not the other.
Bit sensitive are we?In post 250, Haschel Cedricson wrote:...In post 224, Flea The Magician wrote:So in theory it seems all tasks are a post restriction of some sort, I'd expect them all to be "short" style tasks.
O2 and Reactor MUST BE FIXED or imposters win.
Comms would be a global post restriction maybe?
Lights might hide kills?
What good canpossiblycome from this line of discussion?
Since I don't have to go anywhere else, I want to hold off and go it alone if my destination doesn't make sense with the rest of you, then you don't have to repeat rooms on my account.In post 488, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:The sooner we get all the claims in the sooner we can plan out movement and scum can’t change their claims later.
That checks out actually. Time would have been of the essence.In post 489, Akarin wrote:Flea did a big catchup post, if they really cared about getting the pass from you that much they could have just made that joke before doing it.In post 486, Gamma Emerald wrote:Flea had the same intent. Why is it deifferent if it comes after? That seems a bit dishonest to push one and not the other.
Possibly maybe.In post 493, Akarin wrote:Since I don't have to go anywhere else, I want to hold off and go it alone if my destination doesn't make sense with the rest of you, then you don't have to repeat rooms on my account.In post 488, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:The sooner we get all the claims in the sooner we can plan out movement and scum can’t change their claims later.
I think people with 2 different destinations should claim.
I should claim if I'm gonna end up with someone n1 anyway.
Does that make sense?
Honestly this seems like a very solid planIn post 261, Gamma Emerald wrote:Also I think groups of 3 should work for trying to keep scum from killing
Maybe have 2 groups of 2 to deal with the last one tonight?
In retrospect this question was stupid but my eyes were glazing over when I first read that part of the setupIn post 273, Gamma Emerald wrote:How do scum “take” tasks