Mafiascum.net

In post 476, Chumbo wrote:I really don't get the intention behind the PRs post by N_M

In post 478, Not_Mafia wrote:

In post 476, Chumbo wrote:I really don't get the intention behind the PRs post by N_M

The intention is there in black and white, you just

don't

want to read it as scummy because you don't like me as a player

In post 74, LoneMarkhor wrote:Not_Mafia is really pro-town.Everyone should trust him.
VOTE: Not_mafia

In post 105, LoneMarkhor wrote:I think Not Mafia is the most likely to be mafia.He has been acting insane since the beginning. Its like'Let the town fight among themselves.'
Marcistar: You are voting me but you are ignoring Not_Mafia.What should I think of that?
Most likely partners are paopao or marcistar but I am not sure about that yet.

In post 114, LoneMarkhor wrote:Why I think Marcistar is scum partner with not_mafia is because she voted me for not being so active but ignored not_mafia.Pao because of the post where he said he doesn't believe no_mafia is scum.But then I remembered that many other players are also not noticing not_mafia so I realized I was wrong.

In post 117, LoneMarkhor wrote:I feel we should sort out not_mafia first if that's his play style or something.Idk if he'll get any serious. I think scum use D1
for townies to get eliminated as in the end only they get suspected because the scum are just trying to not get suspected.

In post 138, LoneMarkhor wrote:So nobody else thinks not_mafia is scum?

MOD: Is there some kind of rule that one scum is always SE or is it completely random?

In post 482, Not_Mafia wrote:VOTE: Donkey Kong

In post 481, Chumbo wrote:The intention is that people should claim,

In post 481, Chumbo wrote:We still have the same percentage chance beforehand.

In post 481, Chumbo wrote:Pedit: Those were all in the first few pages of the game.

In post 484, Not_Mafia wrote:Your point being? Scum are at their most awkward and unsure at the start of the game. Newbscum doesn't come out bussing, they come out trying to push what they think is an easy miselim cos they see the idiot with the dancing cow avatar claiming Jester in giant rainbow text. Scum love to try and push me early game.

In post 464, Not_Mafia wrote:Btw there's a 1/3 chance we're in a set-up with just one PR.

Everyone should confirm if they are a friendly neighbour in their next post. If there is a Friendly Neighbour then the 2 PRs plus the innocent from the JK or Tracker gives us 3 conftowns and leaves us with 1 scum to find in 4 people and 3 eliminations to do it, which is a 75% chance to win.

If there isn't one and there is a tracker then they know they either have a doc or JK to protect them and can out results with more confidence,

If there are masons then those claiming puts us in a good position, with 3 eliminations in 5 players. But it's debatable whether they should claim.

In post 490, Not_Mafia wrote:If there is a Friendly Neighbour, then we are in one of two set-ups

Goon, Rolecop vs Friendly Neighbour, Jailkeeper and 5 VTs
Goon, Rolecop vs Tracker,

Jailkeeper

Friendly Neighbour and 5 VTs

The JK or Tracker cannot have been blocked so will be guaranteed to have a result (unless they targetted Battle Mage, which is unlikely), the two PRs plus the innocent result from the JK or Tracker gives us 3 confirmed town, meaning only 4 players can possibly be scum, we have 3 eliminations left so we would have 3/4 chance to eliminate the last scum

In post 494, Chumbo wrote:Every setup has a goon in it.