Posted: Fri May 28, 2021 10:23 am
In post 468, JacksonVirgo wrote:My scum-play is primarily based on making near-perfect mechanical plays where applicable and controlling the Town to push my own agenda. Feel free to look into my games to confirm this yourself instead of needing to trust my word. Check my wiki page for a current list of my games or at least I think it's current.In post 466, humaneatingmonkey wrote:I have no idea how you play as scum, nor do I have any idea what kind of emotional range your scumplay has. This might just be good emotional scumplay. What you're doing is enough to make me question my read on you, but I'm not really sure where to proceed from here.In post 458, JacksonVirgo wrote:You feel manipulated? What do you mean? Are you saying you're having doubts about your read on me, but throw it up to being manipulated over noticing that everything else isn't pointing towards the same outcome as the original proposed slip would suggest.
I'm thinking out loud because I can always look back to this moment and remember what I felt like. And maybe others too.
You have time to convince us otherwise.In post 477, navigatorv wrote:Here's hoping Fizz responds. Even if I think this is the best decision, I still don't like the idea of her getting eliminated without offering up something in her defense
You missed their meaning.In post 479, JamesTheNames wrote:You have time to convince us otherwise.In post 477, navigatorv wrote:Here's hoping Fizz responds. Even if I think this is the best decision, I still don't like the idea of her getting eliminated without offering up something in her defense
I understood their meaning.In post 480, JacksonVirgo wrote:You missed their meaning.In post 479, JamesTheNames wrote:You have time to convince us otherwise.In post 477, navigatorv wrote:Here's hoping Fizz responds. Even if I think this is the best decision, I still don't like the idea of her getting eliminated without offering up something in her defense
You sure? Cause I still think she's scum and am keeping my vote, I just want to see at least an attempt at defense is allIn post 481, JamesTheNames wrote:I understood their meaning.In post 480, JacksonVirgo wrote:You missed their meaning.In post 479, JamesTheNames wrote:You have time to convince us otherwise.In post 477, navigatorv wrote:Here's hoping Fizz responds. Even if I think this is the best decision, I still don't like the idea of her getting eliminated without offering up something in her defense
Apparently I can't read. This is what happens when you spend all night trying to code lagrange multipliers and eigenvectors...In post 483, navigatorv wrote:You sure? Cause I still think she's scum and am keeping my vote, I just want to see at least an attempt at defense is allIn post 481, JamesTheNames wrote:I understood their meaning.In post 480, JacksonVirgo wrote:You missed their meaning.In post 479, JamesTheNames wrote:You have time to convince us otherwise.In post 477, navigatorv wrote:Here's hoping Fizz responds. Even if I think this is the best decision, I still don't like the idea of her getting eliminated without offering up something in her defense
Welcome to maths.In post 485, JohnnyFarrar wrote:Those are fake words
I am not very confident with my ability to parse meta-information and applying it to any games so I'm just going to note what you said and come back to it later. Either way, I doubt I can convince everyone to wagon you right now.In post 478, JacksonVirgo wrote:@HEM are you going to respond to this
Math is a social constructIn post 486, JamesTheNames wrote:Welcome to maths.In post 485, JohnnyFarrar wrote:Those are fake words
I know too many Maths with Philosophy minors to be willing to discuss this again I apologise.In post 488, navigatorv wrote:Math is a social constructIn post 486, JamesTheNames wrote:Welcome to maths.In post 485, JohnnyFarrar wrote:Those are fake words
It's okay, I wasn't trying to start a serious discussion lolIn post 489, JamesTheNames wrote:I know too many Maths with Philosophy minors to be willing to discuss this again I apologise.In post 488, navigatorv wrote:Math is a social constructIn post 486, JamesTheNames wrote:Welcome to maths.In post 485, JohnnyFarrar wrote:Those are fake words
AsleepIn post 492, JacksonVirgo wrote:What do you think the reasons they're not here at the moment
Noted.In post 498, humaneatingmonkey wrote:A hammer is a hammer, regardless of intent. Intent to hammer are just given as a warning to the person in E-1 to give them chance to claim or defend.