Posted: Fri Jul 09, 2021 11:28 am
Oh I will, but I've been busy for most of the day, so I can't really respond. Speaking of which, I looked through your ISO and noted you town read people who have similar thought processes or sheep. Can you explain this thought process behind that?In post 453, GrandpaMo wrote:Okay, I wasn't going to say something but this bothered me.In post 429, StrangeMatter wrote:Excuse me, but did you mean [VPF, StrangeMatter]? Rockey isn't in this game anymore.In post 428, GrandpaMo wrote:hm. so its more like this.
I am thinking about this pool:
[VFP, rockey, StrangeMatter]
or the other subgroup of
[Hockey, Cows, Bulge]
I feel like those 3 of hockey, cows, bulge there is one PR, one scum, and one VT.
And the other scum lies within the first group.
I won't explain why those groups are combined just yet.
Strangematter finally comes into the game and responds to me mistankly having the wrong name.
Then disappears.
It was so out of place and just felt unnatural. I thought strangematter would eventually respond to my points or even to other things just like hockey would have, but they never did, they just made that complaint and left the thread once again.
In post 471, cowsloveSushirolls wrote:your case consists blaming them for fluffposting for exactly one (1) day then using the next day to get out of the RVS phase (their vote on you was a meme, and they explained why you look good enough to unvote)In post 449, GrandpaMo wrote:You have yet to explain why my scumread on rocky is bad.In post 439, cowsloveSushirolls wrote:fwiw my biggest gripes with grandpa is their case on rocky which likely has the wackest logic used on this thread
but their conversations with hockey feel natural despite being based on a dumptruck of misinterpretations and they use conversations like these to build on reads that feel good
tonally, their ISO is a ton of highs and lows. my conclusion right now is that they probably shouldn't be condemned today and they have much, much more to offer
vote stays though cause lol i dont wanna go to the reply button
Can you explain why fluff content is good for town? Also can you explain when strangematter replaced in, their reaction was horrible in regarding to hockey?
Are you able to reevualate and see strangematter as scum or nah, they still town in ur eyes?
none of that is unorthrodox or scummy, even by d1 standards
i think anyone, given the chance to look at each of our opening posts can agree that rocky looks the most natural, too
and zzz grandpa the middle line is stuff only you believe/strawmen (puke,) but i'll answer it the best i can
fluff content is normal for both alignments, especially that early into the game. they're good for town because if it's funny then you get townread by cows
their reaction wasn't horrible, from what i read of them (i read hockey's pizza newbie game) i never really thought of them as particularly cordial
i reevaluated basically everything strange has to offer, i think the rep hasn't done anything alignment indicative and that the slot itself is a townlean
basicially i'm more interested in what you guys have to say about strange than strange
This does not sound in the slightest way genuine, 7 posts, the first 3 are fluff to do with sandwiches, 3 are just clarification posts, and the other 1 is barely pushing anything. I really am tempted to go back to voting you now.In post 477, HockeyFan wrote:In post 471, cowsloveSushirolls wrote:your case consists blaming them for fluffposting for exactly one (1) day then using the next day to get out of the RVS phase (their vote on you was a meme, and they explained why you look good enough to unvote)In post 449, GrandpaMo wrote:You have yet to explain why my scumread on rocky is bad.In post 439, cowsloveSushirolls wrote:fwiw my biggest gripes with grandpa is their case on rocky which likely has the wackest logic used on this thread
but their conversations with hockey feel natural despite being based on a dumptruck of misinterpretations and they use conversations like these to build on reads that feel good
tonally, their ISO is a ton of highs and lows. my conclusion right now is that they probably shouldn't be condemned today and they have much, much more to offer
vote stays though cause lol i dont wanna go to the reply button
Can you explain why fluff content is good for town? Also can you explain when strangematter replaced in, their reaction was horrible in regarding to hockey?
Are you able to reevualate and see strangematter as scum or nah, they still town in ur eyes?
none of that is unorthrodox or scummy, even by d1 standards
i think anyone, given the chance to look at each of our opening posts can agree that rocky looks the most natural, too
and zzz grandpa the middle line is stuff only you believe/strawmen (puke,) but i'll answer it the best i can
fluff content is normal for both alignments, especially that early into the game. they're good for town because if it's funny then you get townread by cows
their reaction wasn't horrible, from what i read of them (i read hockey's pizza newbie game) i never really thought of them as particularly cordial
i reevaluated basically everything strange has to offer, i think the rep hasn't done anything alignment indicative and that the slot itself is a townlean
basicially i'm more interested in what you guys have to say about strange than strangeI know u didnt ask me but i have a slight TL on strange here becuz compared to Newbie 2067, they are much more agressive. Sure their answer to my first question was bad, but i dont think it offsets the TL that much
I mean, England vs Italy is tomorrow at 8pm (GMT), so I'm still going to be here. Although I'm looking at [T3, Hockey Fan, Beese Churger] as my elimination pool.In post 479, cowsloveSushirolls wrote:lol james being here just reminded me
UNVOTE: GrandpaMo
if you guys actually are gonna enjoy the weekend, can we get a condemn pool first? i think letting those thoughts out to dry, PUBLICALLY. is best for town to prevent a rushed elimination
for example, i likely wont budge on strange's slot or grandpa today. beese too is absolutely one of the worst condemns
a vote on james requires a lot of negotiation
hockey is a wildcard and i still haven't checked their ISO and evaluated their content
this leaves {bulge, VFP. T3, maybe hockey} which at a first glance doesn't feel particularly right
VFP's playstyle makes absolutely no sense from a mafia perspective, so i might pass on that one too
expect a lot of poking around with these people
huh yea I had an early tonal TR there, but looking back over his iso, that's pretty easily scum. I don't have a good read on strangematter yet so the slot is pretty hard null for me atpIn post 415, cowsloveSushirolls wrote:in more general terms: does anyone have any thoughts about rock's interactions with people? I dont believe any comments have been made about their general contentIn post 412, The Bulge wrote:I don't understand what you're looking for here exactly?In post 408, cowsloveSushirolls wrote:anyone wanna explain rocky's fixation on james
[/quote]
ftr, while Beese would indeed be a terrible elimination today, I do think the slot is far more likely scum than not.In post 463, HockeyFan wrote:Why would u want to lim someone who basically hasn't spoken yetVFP wrote:I can still lim this slot. Depending if Theres a replacement of course...In post 459, Beesechurger wrote:Man I'm 10 minutes late I suck
I disagree. it might not be a Good way of playing scum, but we can't discount theories in the realm of, for example, what if vfp hates playing scum, has realized people in the newbie queue are unlikely to actually pile on against inactivity/noncontribution, and so decides to go with the easier playstyle for peace of mind? I'm talking out of my ass a little here, I only have 1 game with vfp, but my point is that in general, those kinds of possibilities and other irl factors should never beIn post 479, cowsloveSushirolls wrote:VFP's playstyle makes absolutely no sense from a mafia perspective, so i might pass on that one too
In post 478, JamesTheNames wrote:This does not sound in the slightest way genuine, 7 posts, the first 3 are fluff to do with sandwiches, 3 are just clarification posts, and the other 1 is barely pushing anything. I really am tempted to go back to voting you now.In post 477, HockeyFan wrote:In post 471, cowsloveSushirolls wrote:your case consists blaming them for fluffposting for exactly one (1) day then using the next day to get out of the RVS phase (their vote on you was a meme, and they explained why you look good enough to unvote)In post 449, GrandpaMo wrote:You have yet to explain why my scumread on rocky is bad.In post 439, cowsloveSushirolls wrote:fwiw my biggest gripes with grandpa is their case on rocky which likely has the wackest logic used on this thread
but their conversations with hockey feel natural despite being based on a dumptruck of misinterpretations and they use conversations like these to build on reads that feel good
tonally, their ISO is a ton of highs and lows. my conclusion right now is that they probably shouldn't be condemned today and they have much, much more to offer
vote stays though cause lol i dont wanna go to the reply button
Can you explain why fluff content is good for town? Also can you explain when strangematter replaced in, their reaction was horrible in regarding to hockey?
Are you able to reevualate and see strangematter as scum or nah, they still town in ur eyes?
none of that is unorthrodox or scummy, even by d1 standards
i think anyone, given the chance to look at each of our opening posts can agree that rocky looks the most natural, too
and zzz grandpa the middle line is stuff only you believe/strawmen (puke,) but i'll answer it the best i can
fluff content is normal for both alignments, especially that early into the game. they're good for town because if it's funny then you get townread by cows
their reaction wasn't horrible, from what i read of them (i read hockey's pizza newbie game) i never really thought of them as particularly cordial
i reevaluated basically everything strange has to offer, i think the rep hasn't done anything alignment indicative and that the slot itself is a townlean
basicially i'm more interested in what you guys have to say about strange than strangeI know u didnt ask me but i have a slight TL on strange here becuz compared to Newbie 2067, they are much more agressive. Sure their answer to my first question was bad, but i dont think it offsets the TL that much
In post 487, GrandpaMo wrote:can we just get a flip already lol
@cows, why do u SR bulge, i actually think they're quite townIn post 479, cowsloveSushirolls wrote:lol james being here just reminded me
UNVOTE: GrandpaMo
if you guys actually are gonna enjoy the weekend, can we get a condemn pool first? i think letting those thoughts out to dry, PUBLICALLY. is best for town to prevent a rushed elimination
for example, i likely wont budge on strange's slot or grandpa today. beese too is absolutely one of the worst condemns
a vote on james requires a lot of negotiation
hockey is a wildcard and i still haven't checked their ISO and evaluated their content
this leaves {bulge, VFP. T3, maybe hockey} which at a first glance doesn't feel particularly right
VFP's playstyle makes absolutely no sense from a mafia perspective, so i might pass on that one too
disagree
expect a lot of poking around with these people
the people i listed above the condemn pool are people i'd actually defend if people came rallying against themIn post 492, HockeyFan wrote:@cows, why do u SR bulge, i actually think they're quite town
hi townIn post 494, The Bulge wrote:im town
also sorry, it took one page before i contradicted myselfIn post 434, cowsloveSushirolls wrote:i want to clarify that when making the post i was basically thinking 'T3 earlygame bad, midgame fine'. i think it's too early to start excusing certain actions because of others or even to start solidifying any sort of reads on T3In post 413, HockeyFan wrote:your tldr of that post was litreally "T3 looks bad earlygame but has lightened up with towny posts"
In post 407, cowsloveSushirolls wrote:seems rather PRESUMPTUOUS that you think that i think T3's later logs excuse his earlier postsIn post 405, HockeyFan wrote:Do u really think T3's latter posts are "town" enough to make up for the scummier posts above? Cuz I dont think so. They're not *that* town to me. Sure they may not be scummy, but defintely not enough to cancel out his scum logs at the beginning of the game so im curious why u think that?
but they do, because the beginning logs only show an unwillingness to contribute. you seem to think that the logs i showed later are only moderately town, but know that T3's beginning logs are only moderately scummy and so your scumlean doesn't make too much sense, unless you put a lot of weight into scum logs (do you?)
T3 probably just hates the random voting stage or something
you're doing this so that you can snatch the 500th post from me huhIn post 496, The Bulge wrote:were masons now