Page 20 of 39

Posted: Sun Sep 26, 2021 10:25 pm
by CheekyTeeky
VOTE: Connor (E-2 for those wagon challenged among us :P )

Posted: Mon Sep 27, 2021 1:10 am
by Connordragon07
In post 469, RH9 wrote:And actually, I might vote for Connordragon07 because he seems to want Cop to out if they have info even though this might put Cop in danger. See . VOTE: Connordragon07
By 'Info' I mean when they find someone guilty lol, also Tracker exists in most slots in the NewD3 setup but I'm just saying Cop since I'm more accustomed to them being the classic Town Investigative. (sheriff in ToS works the same, cop in Mafia.gg, tracker is in paid DLC only for ToS and I don't think I've encountered a tracker before on Mafia.gg.)
In post 474, RH9 wrote:And as possibly my last post for Day 1, I'm going to make a table of observations.
RH9's Observations
Player Notes
Connordragon07 Does not seem concerned about my PR hunt and seems to find it all right for Cop to out if they have info, even. if this could lead to a PR getting killed by Mafia. Seemed to have thought that eliminating RegRider was mislim, though that seems to be because he thinks that we shouldn't vote without evidence, which makes sense. See Posts , ,, and .
Still kinda unsure why people think I properly PR hunted, since all I did was say I had the same opinion as you on Snivy, wasn't concerned about PR hunting as much because in my mind it was just like VFR'ing people, though I've obviously learnt my lesson on not to state my role opinions unless I think they're scum/townie and not the specific role lol. For the Cop bit, see above.
In post 474, RH9 wrote:And as possibly my last post for Day 1, I'm going to make a table of observations.
RH9's Observations
Player Notes
MargotRosa Also is very good at being convincing. See Post which convinced me to vote Prism, for a while.
I do agree that Margot was very convincing when she first appeared, but I don't really trust them anymore after Prism brought up the fact that most of their claims were contradictory to what she was saying while voting them, saying that their voting made no sense and was scummy despite the fact they said that they were only bandwagoning and not voting in their reads list.

Posted: Mon Sep 27, 2021 2:41 am
by Prism
In post 472, RegRider wrote:
In post 469, RH9 wrote:And actually, I might vote for Connordragon07 because he seems to want Cop to out if they have info even though this might put Cop in danger. See . VOTE: Connordragon07
Cop should out if they have a guilty, but this is funny coming from the person who was PR fishing.
...Is this seriously the only thing you have to comment on after being AWOL the last few days?

Tempted to abandon my own wagon and vote you for this alone.

Posted: Mon Sep 27, 2021 2:54 am
by Prism
FWIW I didn't take Connor's post as PR hunting, or talking about roles/guilties in this game at all. He was talking about how unused to voting people out without mechanical info he was, and gave two countervailing examples (abundance of clears, cop guilties, etc.) without applying them to this game. He wasn't asking for cop, inviting people to talk about a report, or even opposing voting people out today.

Please also note that this game is daystart, and that no night actions have been taken by any roles.

Posted: Mon Sep 27, 2021 4:08 am
by Prism
7 hours to deadline. I'm down to flip either of the two main wagons (Connor, RegRider)

I was opposed to RegRider up until he decided there was nothing worth commenting on from the last 3 days.

Posted: Mon Sep 27, 2021 4:40 am
by Connordragon07
In post 477, Prism wrote:
In post 472, RegRider wrote:
In post 469, RH9 wrote:And actually, I might vote for Connordragon07 because he seems to want Cop to out if they have info even though this might put Cop in danger. See . VOTE: Connordragon07
Cop should out if they have a guilty, but this is funny coming from the person who was PR fishing.
...Is this seriously the only thing you have to comment on after being AWOL the last few days?

Tempted to abandon my own wagon and vote you for this alone.
Hey, now it's my turn to not know what an abbreviation means lol, what exactly does AWOL stand for? Can't find any info about it by searching on the wiki or looking on the Commonly Used Abbreviations page.

Posted: Mon Sep 27, 2021 5:06 am
by RegRider
In post 480, Connordragon07 wrote:
In post 477, Prism wrote:
In post 472, RegRider wrote:
In post 469, RH9 wrote:And actually, I might vote for Connordragon07 because he seems to want Cop to out if they have info even though this might put Cop in danger. See . VOTE: Connordragon07
Cop should out if they have a guilty, but this is funny coming from the person who was PR fishing.
...Is this seriously the only thing you have to comment on after being AWOL the last few days?

Tempted to abandon my own wagon and vote you for this alone.
Hey, now it's my turn to not know what an abbreviation means lol, what exactly does AWOL stand for? Can't find any info about it by searching on the wiki or looking on the Commonly Used Abbreviations page.
AWOL isn't a mafia abbreviation. It (iirc) is a military term meaning Absent Without Offical Leave. Basically lurking.

Posted: Mon Sep 27, 2021 5:09 am
by RegRider
In post 477, Prism wrote:
In post 472, RegRider wrote:
In post 469, RH9 wrote:And actually, I might vote for Connordragon07 because he seems to want Cop to out if they have info even though this might put Cop in danger. See . VOTE: Connordragon07
Cop should out if they have a guilty, but this is funny coming from the person who was PR fishing.
...Is this seriously the only thing you have to comment on after being AWOL the last few days?

Tempted to abandon my own wagon and vote you for this alone.
Honestly I admit I been lazy for this day, but you should focus on other players and not seething at me. I suggest you look towards Cheeky.

Posted: Mon Sep 27, 2021 5:13 am
by RegRider
Like you guys need to stay on wagons mere hours from deadline. I'll quickly ISO Connor before deciding if I want to vote him. Its a shame that town is off to a rough start and that I am a miselim target but w/e.

Posted: Mon Sep 27, 2021 5:17 am
by Connordragon07
In post 481, RegRider wrote:
In post 480, Connordragon07 wrote:
In post 477, Prism wrote:
In post 472, RegRider wrote:
In post 469, RH9 wrote:And actually, I might vote for Connordragon07 because he seems to want Cop to out if they have info even though this might put Cop in danger. See . VOTE: Connordragon07
Cop should out if they have a guilty, but this is funny coming from the person who was PR fishing.
...Is this seriously the only thing you have to comment on after being AWOL the last few days?

Tempted to abandon my own wagon and vote you for this alone.
Hey, now it's my turn to not know what an abbreviation means lol, what exactly does AWOL stand for? Can't find any info about it by searching on the wiki or looking on the Commonly Used Abbreviations page.
AWOL isn't a mafia abbreviation. It (iirc) is a military term meaning Absent Without Offical Leave. Basically lurking.
Ty, checked it on google after you said this and this is the definition I got.
AWOL
/ˈeɪwɒl/
adjective-MILITARY
absent without official leave but without intent to desert.
"we not only dealt with the enemy but with servicemen who had gone AWOL"
absent from where one should be; missing.
"if, having been treated in this way, students go AWOL, no one should be surprised"

Posted: Mon Sep 27, 2021 5:36 am
by RegRider
:/ kinda TR Connor. While not very active he still interacted with other people and sporadically gave reads. I would rather we flip to someone like Cheeky who seems scared to elim me, or like flow idc.

Posted: Mon Sep 27, 2021 5:40 am
by RegRider
As for why I unvoted Cheeky immediately after voting her at E-3, the way I look at votes is more like, this person is doing something suspicious. If I like whatever answer I get, I can unvote, but if I don't my vote stays. Even if you think its odd I would immediately unvote, Cheeky herself just switched to Connor, basically dooming my wagon.

Posted: Mon Sep 27, 2021 6:09 am
by DaTacoX
In post 486, RegRider wrote:As for why I unvoted Cheeky immediately after voting her at E-3, the way I look at votes is more like, this person is doing something suspicious. If I like whatever answer I get, I can unvote, but if I don't my vote stays. Even if you think its odd I would immediately unvote, Cheeky herself just switched to Connor, basically dooming my wagon.
But you didn't unvote Cheeky because of a response? The only message between then and your unvote was camel stating that Cheeky was at E-2?

Posted: Mon Sep 27, 2021 6:11 am
by DaTacoX
In post 472, RegRider wrote:
In post 469, RH9 wrote:And actually, I might vote for Connordragon07 because he seems to want Cop to out if they have info even though this might put Cop in danger. See . VOTE: Connordragon07
Cop should out if they have a guilty, but this is funny coming from the person who was PR fishing.
It's day 1. Even if there is a cop, they couldn't have any information we don't.

Posted: Mon Sep 27, 2021 6:13 am
by Prism
RegRider, not only did I ask you questions, Cheeky currently has 0 votes. She needs 5. You are not even voting.

Why should I assume this is even remotely in good faith?

Posted: Mon Sep 27, 2021 6:14 am
by Prism
The deadline is in literally 5 hours. We need to flip LITERALLY ANYONE

Posted: Mon Sep 27, 2021 6:16 am
by Prism
You (RegRider) literally spent half the day crying out for a readslist from Cheeky then completely refused to react to it, and are now pushing her anyway with zero votes 5 hours from deadline.

Posted: Mon Sep 27, 2021 6:17 am
by DaTacoX
If it comes down to it, I will vote for Connor as he is very low on my list. My priority is RegRider as he still has not given me any reason to switch off.

Posted: Mon Sep 27, 2021 6:40 am
by Prism
If RegRider would actually vote we could flip Connor

Alternatively if he doesn't we flip him by default, so lmao

Posted: Mon Sep 27, 2021 6:51 am
by Prism
My preference is still Connor but if him+Cheeky both show up I will flip my vote to Reg. I do not care who or what we wind up flipping, we cannot throw away an elim for no reason.

Posted: Mon Sep 27, 2021 6:59 am
by Connordragon07
Is No Condemn just as viable as it is in Mafia.gg/ToS or is it more beneficial to random vote D1? If it will benefit town more then I will vote for Reg, even though I don't really think it's him.

Posted: Mon Sep 27, 2021 7:13 am
by Prism
It is better to random vote than it is to no condemn.

It is 100% better to elim a VT over no condemn and without getting specific there are PRs where it is STILL better to vote them out than to no condemn. Elims are town's most precious resource in the setup and we only have three. No condemn instantly drops us down to two.

Posted: Mon Sep 27, 2021 7:19 am
by Connordragon07
Alright then, guess I'll VOTE: RegRider, not really sure it's them but I don't wanna be miscondemned so.

Posted: Mon Sep 27, 2021 7:25 am
by Prism
We're at 3-3. DTX/I are parallel with opposite approaches but available to swap.

What goes through really depends on which of Reg/flow trap show up. Margot's timezone doesn't leave me hopeful they drop by.

Cheeky/camel/RH9 are all voting between the wagons but could also show up and flip.

Posted: Mon Sep 27, 2021 7:26 am
by Connordragon07
How long do we have until days ends?