Page 20 of 49

Posted: Sat Nov 13, 2021 4:49 pm
by PenguinPower
Nice deflection.

I don't really a care that I'm the leading wagon? I already explained why most vote is on Egix. I am scumhunting - it's apparent from almost all of my games how i do so. I don't know how I feel about you but I don't like the recent comment and now deflection. Not shading you - I'm poiting it out.

Cool - we caught up?

Posted: Sat Nov 13, 2021 4:49 pm
by PenguinPower
solid pagetop if i may say so myself

Posted: Sat Nov 13, 2021 4:50 pm
by Roden
Dragging content out of this game is like pulling teeth.

Posted: Sat Nov 13, 2021 4:50 pm
by PenguinPower
In post 474, Roden wrote:Penguin can you tell me what NAI means?
Probably the neutral position of a miselim

Posted: Sat Nov 13, 2021 4:51 pm
by Gamma Emerald
I rlly feel like this is not an argument where both parties are acting in good faith
I am not pre-judging that i's roden acting in bad faith tho

Posted: Sat Nov 13, 2021 4:54 pm
by Roden
In post 475, PenguinPower wrote:Nice deflection.

I don't really a care that I'm the leading wagon? I already explained why most vote is on Egix. I am scumhunting - it's apparent from almost all of my games how i do so. I don't know how I feel about you but I don't like the recent comment and now deflection. Not shading you - I'm poiting it out.

Cool - we caught up?
Not a deflection, you're allowed to talk about multiple things at once.
In post 448, PenguinPower wrote:VOTE: egix

at least there's competing wagons for the first time this game

:yawn:
This is the only time you mention Egix. I don't see the explanation.

Posted: Sat Nov 13, 2021 4:55 pm
by Roden
In post 478, PenguinPower wrote:
In post 474, Roden wrote:Penguin can you tell me what NAI means?
Probably the neutral position of a miselim
Cool, now explain how to find the neutral position of a mis-elim.

Posted: Sat Nov 13, 2021 4:55 pm
by PenguinPower
It's literaly in the line below the vote....my god

Posted: Sat Nov 13, 2021 4:56 pm
by PenguinPower
In post 481, Roden wrote:
In post 478, PenguinPower wrote:
In post 474, Roden wrote:Penguin can you tell me what NAI means?
Probably the neutral position of a miselim
Cool, now explain how to find the neutral position of a mis-elim.
By stopping at NAI and not point out the miselim?

Are you for real?

Posted: Sat Nov 13, 2021 4:57 pm
by Roden
In post 479, Gamma Emerald wrote:I rlly feel like this is not an argument where both parties are acting in good faith
I am not pre-judging that i's roden acting in bad faith tho
Can you explain?

Also do you plan to respond to my earlier posts? Are you just going to park your vote on me or are you going to play?

Posted: Sat Nov 13, 2021 4:58 pm
by Roden
In post 482, PenguinPower wrote:It's literaly in the line below the vote....my god
I just really hoped your only reason for voting Egix wasn't to get another wagon going to oppose your own.

Posted: Sat Nov 13, 2021 4:58 pm
by PenguinPower
Way to spin!

Posted: Sat Nov 13, 2021 4:59 pm
by PenguinPower
fuck off - it's the weekend and i'm lazy but you're not operating in good faith

VOTE: roden

Posted: Sat Nov 13, 2021 5:02 pm
by Roden
In post 483, PenguinPower wrote:
In post 481, Roden wrote:
In post 478, PenguinPower wrote:
In post 474, Roden wrote:Penguin can you tell me what NAI means?
Probably the neutral position of a miselim
Cool, now explain how to find the neutral position of a mis-elim.
By stopping at NAI and not point out the miselim?

Are you for real?
Yes. We're getting very close to seeing eye to eye here.

Now, when someone tells you the behavior of someone that was mis-elim'd, what does that tell you? Are you meant to take that as a town tell? Or just a counter example to perceived scumminess?

Posted: Sat Nov 13, 2021 5:03 pm
by Roden
In post 486, PenguinPower wrote:Way to spin!
In post 487, PenguinPower wrote:fuck off - it's the weekend and i'm lazy but you're not operating in good faith

VOTE: roden
What a terrible reaction.

Posted: Sat Nov 13, 2021 5:07 pm
by Roden
I also don't really care if I get mis-elim'd because this game state is miserable, so that isn't really a threat to me. Literally cannot even ask a question without people screaming "bAd FaItH", like dude just play the game and answer some simple questions so I can read you properly.

Posted: Sat Nov 13, 2021 5:07 pm
by PenguinPower
You literally spun my vote to the incorrect reason despite the stated one and have blatantly acted like an ignoramous. Either you are one or you're acting in bad faith.

But sure - bad reaction on my part. idc.

Posted: Sat Nov 13, 2021 5:07 pm
by PenguinPower
In post 490, Roden wrote:I also don't really care if I get mis-elim'd because this game state is miserable, so that isn't really a threat to me. Literally cannot even ask a question without people screaming "bAd FaItH", like dude just play the game and answer some simple questions so I can read you properly.
lol - this is so gross.

Posted: Sat Nov 13, 2021 5:10 pm
by Gamma Emerald
In post 484, Roden wrote:
In post 479, Gamma Emerald wrote:I rlly feel like this is not an argument where both parties are acting in good faith
I am not pre-judging that i's roden acting in bad faith tho
Can you explain?

Also do you plan to respond to my earlier posts? Are you just going to park your vote on me or are you going to play?
idk if I can put a pin on it rn but something definitely doesn't feel right about y'alls interactions
and idc to respond unless I get something to change the feeling that you're just gonna take what I say and spin it to make me look bad, because I sensed that as your motive in ln 235 and I feel like that's your motive here

Posted: Sat Nov 13, 2021 5:12 pm
by Roden
In post 491, PenguinPower wrote:You literally spun my vote to the incorrect reason despite the stated one and have blatantly acted like an ignoramous. Either you are one or you're acting in bad faith.

But sure - bad reaction on my part. idc.
You don't care yet you're melting down and calling me names.

Also I didn't spin anything? You literally said you were glad there were competing wagons. You happen to be one of them. You voted for the competing one. This is incredibly cut and dry.
In post 492, PenguinPower wrote:
In post 490, Roden wrote:I also don't really care if I get mis-elim'd because this game state is miserable, so that isn't really a threat to me. Literally cannot even ask a question without people screaming "bAd FaItH", like dude just play the game and answer some simple questions so I can read you properly.
lol - this is so gross.
Ok.

Posted: Sat Nov 13, 2021 5:14 pm
by PenguinPower
In post 494, Roden wrote:Also I didn't spin anything? You literally said you were glad there were competing wagons. You happen to be one of them. You voted for the competing one. This is incredibly cut and dry.
You said I voted egix to soley oppose my own. That is not the truth. That is spin.

I vote to create competing wagons - it happens to be why I'm not going ham against my own. That is you spinning.

Keep it coming. This is good info for after a flip.

Posted: Sat Nov 13, 2021 5:15 pm
by PenguinPower
In post 494, Roden wrote:Ok.
Sorry - next time I will just say "what a terrible reaction"

Posted: Sat Nov 13, 2021 5:21 pm
by Roden
In post 493, Gamma Emerald wrote:
In post 484, Roden wrote:
In post 479, Gamma Emerald wrote:I rlly feel like this is not an argument where both parties are acting in good faith
I am not pre-judging that i's roden acting in bad faith tho
Can you explain?

Also do you plan to respond to my earlier posts? Are you just going to park your vote on me or are you going to play?
idk if I can put a pin on it rn but something definitely doesn't feel right about y'alls interactions
and idc to respond unless I get something to change the feeling that you're just gonna take what I say and spin it to make me look bad, because I sensed that as your motive in ln 235 and I feel like that's your motive here
I don't like my interactions with Penguin either.

Don't like that you're parroting Penguin's usage of the word "spin" because I haven't done that to either of you.

I'm not trying to make you look bad, I'm just calling you out on your weak push on me. You keep looking back to LN 235 to try to read me now and I keep telling you not only are you incorrect, you're not really explaining what I've done that's reminiscent of my play there and even admitting that you're not.

I feel like if you'd want to find my actual scum tells then you'd look at the rest of my scum games to find common behavior cues and tactics. But I also think you should just know I'm town from my activity alone. I think your push on me is scummy but I'm not married to the idea that you're scum, you're just not giving me much to work with.

Posted: Sat Nov 13, 2021 5:22 pm
by PenguinPower
lol - i wasn't even pushing you when you started the spin.

Posted: Sat Nov 13, 2021 5:25 pm
by Roden
In post 495, PenguinPower wrote:
In post 494, Roden wrote:Also I didn't spin anything? You literally said you were glad there were competing wagons. You happen to be one of them. You voted for the competing one. This is incredibly cut and dry.
You said I voted egix to soley oppose my own. That is not the truth. That is spin.

I vote to create competing wagons - it happens to be why I'm not going ham against my own. That is you spinning.

Keep it coming. This is good info for after a flip.
What I said isn't incorrect. Do you or do you not want a wagon competing against your own?