Mafiascum.net

Yeah that's a rough tell to walk into Strange..

@Auto

What are your current reads?

I think it's probable the average level of townplay in this game was really high and the scum just lurked out.

In post 474, Frogsterking wrote:The other game in which you were town?

I meant my last newbie game.

Like who wants to play scum in a table where: people aren't bickering and are just openly discussing their reads, data is being recorded and posted throughout the game, no one is spamming the thread, the town all townread each other and the town are even collaborating together on a survey to make it easier to find the scum?

In post 478, StrangeMatter wrote:

In post 474, Frogsterking wrote:The other game in which you were town?

I meant my last newbie game.

Yes and I think you also meant the last game in which you were Town.

In post 477, Frogsterking wrote:I think it's probable the average level of townplay in this game was really high and the scum just lurked out.

Hmmmm ehhh welll…
Maybe? Maybe i’m just a bit too enbittered by me experience but it’s usually never that easy lmao.

In post 478, StrangeMatter wrote:

In post 474, Frogsterking wrote:The other game in which you were town?

I meant my last newbie game.

I'm about to deathtunnel you so if you've had any strong scumreads you've been holding back I suggest you case them now.

In post 481, NorwegianboyEE wrote:

In post 477, Frogsterking wrote:I think it's probable the average level of townplay in this game was really high and the scum just lurked out.

Hmmmm ehhh welll…
Maybe? Maybe i’m just a bit too enbittered by me experience but it’s usually never that easy lmao.

Yeah I am too.

Maybe the experienced playerbase is preselected for players who are in the minority and prefer rolling scum?

@ofmercia

How much experience have you had with social deduction games in general, and how much experience have you had with forum mafia specifically?

I remember Kitty as being experienced with forum mafia?

Norwee how would you react getting a scum role pm replacing into a table as SE when the table looks like this:

In post 479, Frogsterking wrote:Like who wants to play scum in a table where: people aren't bickering and are just openly discussing their reads, data is being recorded and posted throughout the game, no one is spamming the thread, the town all townread each other and the town are even collaborating together on a survey to make it easier to find the scum?

How i’d react? I would just get to work, trying to find out the path to victory.

Okay so hypothetically by this time your iso wouldn't look like Strange's current iso at all?

But to get back to my reads.
I feel scum in this gamestate are likely the slots that prod and stay somewhat active, asking mild questions but not really doing anything. And i think Fwog and maybe also Kitty fit that bill. Mostly Fwog is bothering me though.
Brash slots that feel like they are trying to solve for real include Mercia and Auto so far.

In post 488, Frogsterking wrote:Okay so hypothetically by this time your iso wouldn't look like Strange's current iso at all?

I don’t know.
But you did make me notice that Strange hasn’t really done much other than pointless bickering.

Okay and if fwog and Kitty are both revealed as IC? Then what do you think is the game state?

And not placed a vote yet.

In post 491, Frogsterking wrote:Okay and if fwog and Kitty are both revealed as IC? Then what do you think is the game state?

Would look at Strange and Auto probably.

In post 493, NorwegianboyEE wrote:

In post 491, Frogsterking wrote:Okay and if fwog and Kitty are both revealed as IC? Then what do you think is the game state?

Would look at Strange and Auto probably.

Yeah I'm looking at Strange + one of Auto/Kitty/ofmercia now.

I think Strange is thread flaking now because they walked into a scumtell and got called out.

I’m sorry but I’ve been busy currently. Let’s make up more stuff on your scumtell.

Plus the last time someone did this exact scumtell they were very wrong, like right now.

I gtg but I’ll be back.

In post 496, StrangeMatter wrote:Plus the last time someone said I scumtelled they were very wrong, like right now.

I gtg but I’ll be back.

EBWOP.

Idk what happened to my grammar there.

In post 496, StrangeMatter wrote:Plus the last time someone did this exact scumtell they were very wrong, like right now.

I gtg but I’ll be back.

I'm listening, I suspect we're thinking of different scum tells, and I'm open to being wrong.