Mafiascum.net

In post 432, humaneatingmonkey wrote:

In post 430, scamper wrote:so like, do u actually have thoughts on fireisredsirs explanation for his read on marci?

you say it like i dont

if u said them, i missed it

Not to townslip but i’m town and grateful i have a town role and don’t have to worry this game

In post 474, VP Baltar wrote:

In post 401, Ausuka wrote:

In post 399, VP Baltar wrote:

In post 394, Irrelephant11 wrote:This feels like a wildly out-of-nowhere take?? Like even if you think Ausuka's wrong I'm not sure why it's so unbelievable that her wrong read would be based on vibes

Mostly because Nero hadn't done anything out of normal range there, fmpov, so I wanted to press a little bit and see if she had any deeper reasoning for making a town read there. She did not.

I think pushing on flimsy reads early on in a game can be a fruitful way to catch scum before they find their footing.

And you think town don't have these 'flimsy' reads in the early game or

Like if that's the logic we're going on you are looking very very bad right now

Sure, town can be flimsy.

But they probably have a complete thought process at least. I still don't understand your Nero town ping.

I got an early game gut ping from Nero. I explained something from him I found towny. I think there are other reads you have not applied this strange standard to. This push still feels really weird to me.

In post 408, Ausuka wrote:townread on Relly officially RESCINDED

In post 417, Ydrasse wrote:

In post 416, VP Baltar wrote:

In post 414, Ydrasse wrote:Ignored sadge

Huh?

Did u answer me and i didn’t see

No, I just have no clue what this means. Thought maybe you were rescinding your question

In post 467, humaneatingmonkey wrote:i really like irrelephant he's showing originality

define this "originality"?

UNVOTE:
VOTE: ausuka

i really cant form an opinion about skitter at every game we're in. it's the profile picture. the glassy pixelated face of a tiger. makes it hard to assign a personality.
but she seems proactive and solvy in an organic way. our last game she was scum and i secretly thought her posts really felt forced and awkward trying to bus me this might mean she's town

In post 480, VP Baltar wrote:UNVOTE:
VOTE: ausuka

oh there he goes

making the first move

wow they tied the knot

In post 356, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 335, marcistar wrote:gamma

wassup
I can't see the image

Update
It appears on mobile

In post 470, humaneatingmonkey wrote:like i'm not out here saying GL is being overly negative, i don't think so, but i understand the pov that can think so and call it out post-by-post

i shld probably check before immediately replying

but im not sure thats inherently town? i think that kind of meta-based read is easy to fake. i thought gl's case on me was reachy (altho i am biased), but didnt have a problem with it insofar as all early game cases like that are going to be reachy

Towny: Ausuka, Relly, Marci, Ari

Scummy: HEM, skitter, scamper

In post 376, Ydrasse wrote:

In post 373, VP Baltar wrote:

In post 237, Datisi wrote:ari can maybe be town if she saw something that i also saw. ok no point in being vague when i didn't out too many reads, if she noticed that baltar not voting me is weird, then yeah +town

Red flag.

You think I'm obligated to vote you as my rvs?

i feel like the other reasons so far to suspect datisi feel a bit... better than this

why is this a red flag? datisi feeling entitled to an rvs vote?

I guess I kind of did answer this actually. I think datisi is kind of making up reasons after the fact around his ari play, and part of that is this assumption that I MUST rvs vote dats because I do frequently.

Datisi is well aware that I don't play the opening of games the same all the time. I take different approaches based on my mood and what I think will be interesting. It's just a contrived thought process to me.

In post 487, Gamma Emerald wrote:Towny: Ausuka, Relly, Marci, Ari

Scummy: HEM, skitter, scamper

y am i scummy?

Inchresting

In post 65, Ph0enix wrote:

In post 60, Ausuka wrote:What about my post do you think needs elaboration? I thought I explained myself fine.

Meg is seeing what I'm seeing

,

I think that makes them more likely to be approaching the game with an uninformed mindset

.

I fail to see how one leads to the other.

In post 66, Ausuka wrote:Do you think questioning me about whether mindmelding is a good towntell is going to help solve my alignment?

In post 67, Ph0enix wrote:

In post 66, Ausuka wrote:Do you think questioning me about whether mindmelding is a good towntell is going to help solve my alignment?

I don't think it's a good towntell, and in case it's not, your TR-ing Meg may just be an early attempt at pocketing as far as I'm concerned.

In post 68, Ausuka wrote:I feel like it shouldn't be difficult to believe that a townie might townread someone who shares their perspective and says what they're thinking before they say it. This line of questioning feels like busywork to me, honestly.

Scum Phoenix did like something very similar to me last game

In post 479, scamper wrote:

In post 467, humaneatingmonkey wrote:i really like irrelephant he's showing originality

define this "originality"?

i think scum would draw more from cues they get from the town and it's harder to come up with a read that isn't being floated but would resonate to other people ie me

In post 486, scamper wrote:

In post 470, humaneatingmonkey wrote:like i'm not out here saying GL is being overly negative, i don't think so, but i understand the pov that can think so and call it out post-by-post

i shld probably check before immediately replying

but im not sure thats inherently town? i think that kind of meta-based read is easy to fake. i thought gl's case on me was reachy (altho i am biased), but didnt have a problem with it insofar as all early game cases like that are going to be reachy

i was still talking about irrelephant and not gl

In post 490, Ydrasse wrote:Inchresting

happy birthday!

In post 489, scamper wrote:

In post 487, Gamma Emerald wrote:Towny: Ausuka, Relly, Marci, Ari

Scummy: HEM, skitter, scamper

y am i scummy?

Ur interactions on pg14 seem off

In post 488, VP Baltar wrote:

In post 376, Ydrasse wrote:

In post 373, VP Baltar wrote:

In post 237, Datisi wrote:ari can maybe be town if she saw something that i also saw. ok no point in being vague when i didn't out too many reads, if she noticed that baltar not voting me is weird, then yeah +town

Red flag.

You think I'm obligated to vote you as my rvs?

i feel like the other reasons so far to suspect datisi feel a bit... better than this

why is this a red flag? datisi feeling entitled to an rvs vote?

I guess I kind of did answer this actually. I think datisi is kind of making up reasons after the fact around his ari play, and part of that is this assumption that I MUST rvs vote dats because I do frequently.

Datisi is well aware that I don't play the opening of games the same all the time. I take different approaches based on my mood and what I think will be interesting. It's just a contrived thought process to me.

this is what i was getting at early when i was trying to question you i think maybe i messed up because mobile but

inherently i don’t think i see the red flag in feeling entitled to an rvs vote? like uhhh
in this world if you’re town and datisi isn’t right do you think he picks at the bare minimum thing like that to start engaging with you or about you since it’s pretty weak?

i kiiiind of think that it’s a little towny to feel entitled to xyz happening and harder for a wolf to fake? or not hard but the option isn’t maybe the first to mind...?

does that make sense lol

i'm waiting for ari to turn on or drop some thoughts on datisi

In post 494, humaneatingmonkey wrote:

In post 490, Ydrasse wrote:Inchresting

happy birthday!

ohhh time zones it’s not here yet for me lol but ty!!

VPB is your scamper vote serious