Posted: Thu Sep 15, 2022 3:31 pm
I don't think Mastina ever responded to me anyway.
*raises hand*In post 445, Uncrowned wrote:who has experience playing with Mr vivax
Uh. Ok.
In post 474, Roden wrote:Vibing with this. It's just a reasonable take.In post 353, petapan wrote:the accusation of someone being frozen for not posting within a 19 hour window is pretty lulzy
this isn't fucking mafia universe and i'm grateful for that
(this is not implying a read on ircher ftr)
Not vibing with this though.In post 409, Uncrowned wrote:roden has gone missing ever since he stopped getting questioned for the mech mistake stuff
you got any actual input now or are you just here to defend yourself when you get sussed
I don't think I was gone all that long? I went to bed then went to work when I woke up. And I've been keeping up with the thread and responding to stuff and giving my thoughts. What gave you the impression otherwise?
funnily enough after calling you out i remember thinking "hm maybe that was a bit hasty" but then straight after with your very next post you proved me right and went straight back to mech talk in 432 lolIn post 432, Roden wrote:I think I agree with Penguin 100% here about set up balances. Feels kinda weird, I'm usually neutral at best with him.
Wagons are good.In post 469, Uncrowned wrote:sidenote: i'm also concerned with the lack of input from basically everyone who is parked on the ydrasse wagon, especially since the slot has hardly been commented on seriously by anyone
Trewly i do not careIn post 484, Uncrowned wrote:ydrasse how do you feel about your wagon
yesIn post 485, petapan wrote:and his posts when he came back were kind of bad tbh
do you think she should care? have you looked at those votes?In post 487, Uncrowned wrote:let me rephrase: the people on your wagon
Scummy post in contextIn post 425, PenguinPower wrote:
It also lacks follow through.In post 449, petapan wrote:i mean just the idea that it was being brought up strategically to take pressure off a buddy, i really don't buy that being a thing someone (even titus) actually thinks about. stuff like that almost always gets found organicallyIn post 442, Uncrowned wrote:I understand your point here but the post was made and made very early into the game at that so couldn't it still be used? or am i missing something?In post 438, petapan wrote:it doesn't really make a lot of sense that the supposed "slip" gets brought up to save s_s from pressure because it's not like could plan on ircher making a post like that and pushing it strategically so it's kind of ridiculous
EbwopIn post 494, Lukewarm wrote:doesn't that make SS+furtive scum, and Ircher town?
x4 whoIn post 487, Uncrowned wrote:let me rephrase: the people on your wagon
yeah so this was the original take. furtive didn't say it unless they jumped on it later?In post 221, Titus wrote:I think at least one of Ircher/SS if not both are scum. The timing of this slip argument right as SS gets pushed for reads is a bit sus when that argument was there all along.