Page 20 of 150

Posted: Thu Sep 15, 2022 3:31 pm
by Roden
I don't think Mastina ever responded to me anyway.

Posted: Thu Sep 15, 2022 3:41 pm
by Roden
In post 445, Uncrowned wrote:who has experience playing with Mr vivax
*raises hand*

He obfuscates his thoughts a lot, I wouldn't call it a gimmick but it definitely sticks out as a playstyle. He's had really solid reads in past games from what I've seen and picks up the slack in the back half of a game.

Posted: Thu Sep 15, 2022 3:45 pm
by Roden
In post 470, Uncrowned wrote:VOTE: Roden

time to play the game my friend
Uh. Ok.

Posted: Thu Sep 15, 2022 3:48 pm
by Uncrowned
In post 474, Roden wrote:
In post 353, petapan wrote:the accusation of someone being frozen for not posting within a 19 hour window is pretty lulzy


this isn't fucking mafia universe and i'm grateful for that


(this is not implying a read on ircher ftr)
Vibing with this. It's just a reasonable take.
In post 409, Uncrowned wrote:roden has gone missing ever since he stopped getting questioned for the mech mistake stuff

you got any actual input now or are you just here to defend yourself when you get sussed
Not vibing with this though.

I don't think I was gone all that long? I went to bed then went to work when I woke up. And I've been keeping up with the thread and responding to stuff and giving my thoughts. What gave you the impression otherwise?
In post 432, Roden wrote:I think I agree with Penguin 100% here about set up balances. Feels kinda weird, I'm usually neutral at best with him.
funnily enough after calling you out i remember thinking "hm maybe that was a bit hasty" but then straight after with your very next post you proved me right and went straight back to mech talk in 432 lol

Posted: Thu Sep 15, 2022 3:49 pm
by Nero Cain

Posted: Thu Sep 15, 2022 3:49 pm
by Uncrowned
and your thoughts prior to this recent posting you've just done were all setup/mech related, so there's not really much to 'vibe' with it's just facts

Posted: Thu Sep 15, 2022 3:51 pm
by PenguinPower
In post 469, Uncrowned wrote:sidenote: i'm also concerned with the lack of input from basically everyone who is parked on the ydrasse wagon, especially since the slot has hardly been commented on seriously by anyone
Wagons are good.

Input given.

Posted: Thu Sep 15, 2022 3:51 pm
by Uncrowned
thank you sir

Posted: Thu Sep 15, 2022 3:53 pm
by Ydrasse
,,,,,,,,,,,,,meep.................

Posted: Thu Sep 15, 2022 3:54 pm
by Uncrowned
ydrasse how do you feel about your wagon

Posted: Thu Sep 15, 2022 3:57 pm
by petapan
the last time i pumped the brakes on an early day 1 ircher wagon he was scum who escaped to get a night action


and his posts when he came back were kind of bad tbh

Posted: Thu Sep 15, 2022 3:58 pm
by Ydrasse
In post 484, Uncrowned wrote:ydrasse how do you feel about your wagon
Trewly i do not care

Posted: Thu Sep 15, 2022 3:59 pm
by Uncrowned
let me rephrase: the people on your wagon

Posted: Thu Sep 15, 2022 4:00 pm
by Uncrowned
In post 485, petapan wrote:and his posts when he came back were kind of bad tbh
yes

Posted: Thu Sep 15, 2022 4:01 pm
by Uncrowned
it's just v minimal and i wouldn't be surprised if it's an attempt to avoid associatives at this point in the event this goes through

Posted: Thu Sep 15, 2022 4:02 pm
by petapan
In post 487, Uncrowned wrote:let me rephrase: the people on your wagon
do you think she should care? have you looked at those votes?

Posted: Thu Sep 15, 2022 4:03 pm
by Uncrowned
from like, a fear of being elimmed perspective? no.

from a "there's probably at least one scum on here" yeah I think so?

Posted: Thu Sep 15, 2022 4:05 pm
by Uncrowned
granted the activity level of the entire wagon is low but i doubt it's just all town chillin on there

i think andre is good out of them, everyone else im null to SLing on

Posted: Thu Sep 15, 2022 4:07 pm
by Vivax
Scummy post in context

Posted: Thu Sep 15, 2022 4:08 pm
by Lukewarm
In post 449, petapan wrote:
In post 442, Uncrowned wrote:
In post 438, petapan wrote:it doesn't really make a lot of sense that the supposed "slip" gets brought up to save s_s from pressure because it's not like could plan on ircher making a post like that and pushing it strategically so it's kind of ridiculous
I understand your point here but the post was made and made very early into the game at that so couldn't it still be used? or am i missing something?
i mean just the idea that it was being brought up strategically to take pressure off a buddy, i really don't buy that being a thing someone (even titus) actually thinks about. stuff like that almost always gets found organically
It also lacks follow through.

Like who brought it up? And shouldn't that person (furtive) then be linked to SS?

And if Furtive is strategically bringing up the Ircher thing to take pressure off of SS, doesn't that make SS+furtive scum, and Ircher?

Instead she has ircher as lock scum, and ss as a potential partner, with no mention of furtive who brought it up.

The whole line of thinking does not make sense to me

Posted: Thu Sep 15, 2022 4:09 pm
by Lukewarm
In post 494, Lukewarm wrote:doesn't that make SS+furtive scum, and Ircher town?
Ebwop

Posted: Thu Sep 15, 2022 4:10 pm
by Ydrasse
In post 487, Uncrowned wrote:let me rephrase: the people on your wagon
x4 who

theres nothing of worth to be read into the votes on me tbh

Posted: Thu Sep 15, 2022 4:10 pm
by Uncrowned
i think titus brought it up originally

Posted: Thu Sep 15, 2022 4:12 pm
by Uncrowned
In post 221, Titus wrote:I think at least one of Ircher/SS if not both are scum. The timing of this slip argument right as SS gets pushed for reads is a bit sus when that argument was there all along.
yeah so this was the original take. furtive didn't say it unless they jumped on it later?

Posted: Thu Sep 15, 2022 4:13 pm
by Uncrowned
oh ffs you meant that Furtive brought up the slip argument sigh i get you now