Mafiascum.net

In post 449, northsidegal wrote:

In post 447, Not Known 15 wrote:Can you please explain this in a bit more detail?

the basic idea for those unfamiliar is that playing scum or just in general lying is a lot more cognitive stress / a lot more of a cognitive load than playing town is, and one consequence of this is that someone may be less likely to pick up on humor, and thus will respond to a joke completely seriously or misinterpret what someone's saying. (ironically enough, exactly like you do right there)

it is also a trademarked tell of NSG incorporated and every time you use it in a game you must give me credit or else receive a cease and desist from my lawyers

In post 450, northsidegal wrote:(by "cease and desist" and "laywers" i mean "brick through the window" and "lawyers")

In post 474, Not Known 15 wrote:

In post 473, PenguinPower wrote:Cool.

No, it's not. I have seen enough of this antitown meta.

In post 477, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 450, northsidegal wrote:(by "cease and desist" and "laywers" i mean "brick through the window" and "lawyers")

In post 476, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 449, northsidegal wrote:

In post 447, Not Known 15 wrote:Can you please explain this in a bit more detail?

the basic idea for those unfamiliar is that playing scum or just in general lying is a lot more cognitive stress / a lot more of a cognitive load than playing town is, and one consequence of this is that someone may be less likely to pick up on humor, and thus will respond to a joke completely seriously or misinterpret what someone's saying. (ironically enough, exactly like you do right there)

it is also a trademarked tell of NSG incorporated and every time you use it in a game you must give me credit or else receive a cease and desist from my lawyers

I apologize

In post 482, PenguinPower wrote:For "stealing the trademark"

In post 376, Dannflor wrote:

In post 365, KittyTacky wrote:

In post 320, Dannflor wrote:

In post 311, KittyTacky wrote:You're null.

I actually do want to deter this wagon because Roden's actions around you feel shitty and in bad faith, IDK where you got that.

mmm I feel it's weird to want to deter a wagon on me but also have me as null

Null = still more likely town than scum because there's more townies than scum.

No! Bad! null = scum because inevitably people *always* end up null reading scum

like without fail

i don't know why I'm trying to convince you to scum read me

In post 394, PenguinPower wrote:How do I know you aren't lying now.....

In post 391, Porkens wrote:

In post 389, Not_Mafia wrote:The number had to be between 0 and 14, it's in the rules

Oh shit the kid fucked up and sent a different version of the rules to scum VOTE: not_mafia

In post 404, JunkoChan wrote:

In post 390, PenguinPower wrote:

In post 389, Not_Mafia wrote:The number had to be between 0 and 14, it's in the rules

Could you point out for me where it says that?

In post 2, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:once alignments have been dealt out, each player must send a (whole, positive) number back to the mod, with the lowest unique number winning the draft.

Google: Positive numbers are greater than 0 and located to the right of 0 on a number line. Negative numbers are less than 0 and located to the left of 0 on a number line. The number zero is neither positive nor negative.

Idk man this is either a stupid scum slip or a stupid Town "play"

In post 485, KittyTacky wrote:

In post 376, Dannflor wrote:

In post 365, KittyTacky wrote:

In post 320, Dannflor wrote:

In post 311, KittyTacky wrote:You're null.

I actually do want to deter this wagon because Roden's actions around you feel shitty and in bad faith, IDK where you got that.

mmm I feel it's weird to want to deter a wagon on me but also have me as null

Null = still more likely town than scum because there's more townies than scum.

No! Bad! null = scum because inevitably people *always* end up null reading scum

like without fail

i don't know why I'm trying to convince you to scum read me

What on God's green Earth is this post? OK you're scummy.
VOTE: Dannflor

In post 490, Yume wrote:One two three.

In post 486, KittyTacky wrote:

In post 394, PenguinPower wrote:How do I know you aren't lying now.....

In post 391, Porkens wrote:

In post 389, Not_Mafia wrote:The number had to be between 0 and 14, it's in the rules

Oh shit the kid fucked up and sent a different version of the rules to scum VOTE: not_mafia

Guys it's Not_Mafia, he's a trollface as both alignments.

In post 493, PenguinPower wrote:

In post 486, KittyTacky wrote:

In post 394, PenguinPower wrote:How do I know you aren't lying now.....

In post 391, Porkens wrote:

In post 389, Not_Mafia wrote:The number had to be between 0 and 14, it's in the rules

Oh shit the kid fucked up and sent a different version of the rules to scum VOTE: not_mafia

Guys it's Not_Mafia, he's a trollface as both alignments.

I…I was joking….

In post 495, Not_Mafia wrote:Where Junko? Why blue hair lady?