Mafiascum.net

In post 79, Copper~ wrote:I don't think Clark is scum. Off-the-hip gut read.

Looking back at your iso, the last time you said anything about clark's alignment was this back on page 4

In post 465, Clark~ wrote:

In post 463, MacReady~ wrote:and is there a reason I should townread you (and therefore not try to lim you today)?

Short of claiming is there any way to answer this question?

who do you think is scum and why?

soundtrack

♫

Main Theme - Desolation

♫
▶ ❚❚ ───────────────────────●─────  3:44 / 4:29

Clark doesn't feel like he's trying to find any bad people at all.

Clark asks what should be done but like it should be pretty obvious what the goal of this game is no?

In post 461, MacReady~ wrote:Hello Garry 2.0

hi!

Fuchs~ wrote:

In post 472, Copper~ wrote:Clark is more likely town.

Elaborate

+1

In post 472, Copper~ wrote:I still think it's Norris and that Clark is more likely town.

Explain the Norris Sr also.

Garry, will you be catching up?

At this point Clarke is by far my favorite wagon. The first incarnation if the slot was very scummy, and the second is not trying to solve the game at all

I am getting somewhat alarmed by the fact that the game is stalling a bit

In post 481, MacReady~ wrote:Garry, will you be catching up?

At this point Clarke is by far my favorite wagon. The first incarnation if the slot was very scummy, and the second is not trying to solve the game at all

In post 482, MacReady~ wrote:I am getting somewhat alarmed by the fact that the game is stalling a bit

VOTE: Clark

I someone already did an intent to E-1. This should get the game moving actively, and Clark is my second choice anyways.

Clark, you should claim.

469 is a post that says my thoughts. I think Fuchs is still being towny in the way he's thinking and presenting the arguments, despite personally not agreeing with them.

The fact that Copper is calling that out makes me feel slightly better on Copper, I guess.

I do think Clark looks significantly worse after that last pop in too. I was gonna vote, but Fuchs beat me to it, so consider this intent/spiritual vote/whatever.

Much less thrilled with this Garry than with the last one, BTW.

In post 475, Fuchs~ wrote:

In post 79, Copper~ wrote:I don't think Clark is scum. Off-the-hip gut read.

Looking back at your iso, the last time you said anything about clark's alignment was this back on page 4

Interesting. A Copper-Clark scumteam would explain why it's been hard to get traction with the Copper wagon if scum have been hoping to shift things onto Norris earlier and/or myself more recently.

I had a good first impression of the new Clark's posts right after replacing in but agree that she's not really done anything since.

Though, that's a caveat for me: would someone replace into a scum-read slot and do this little to shake attention elsewhere? It seems a little surprising?

Though then again I guess it would be a little surprising regardless of their alignment. Just surprising passivity to replace in and basically potter around but NAI I guess.

At any rate, I agree Clark should claim.

Hmm. Reminder to self to post the thought I just had, once it can safely be posted without potentially helping scum.

In post 471, Copper~ wrote:Nauls and Fuchs TvT 90%.

I found something I agree with Cooper about!

In post 485, Windows~ wrote:Though, that's a caveat for me: would someone replace into a scum-read slot and do this little to shake attention elsewhere? It seems a little surprising?

I don't think it's always a matter of choice.

In post 481, MacReady~ wrote:Garry, will you be catching up?

At this point Clarke is by far my favorite wagon. The first incarnation if the slot was very scummy, and the second is not trying to solve the game at all

I will.
I might iso a few people but my current SRs from my skimthrough is Clark and Cooper.

In post 474, Fuchs~ wrote:

In post 472, Copper~ wrote:Clark is more likely town.

Elaborate

Norris really isn't doing all that much except troll up the thread. Could be frustrated town but more likely openwolfing.

In post 475, Fuchs~ wrote:

In post 79, Copper~ wrote:I don't think Clark is scum. Off-the-hip gut read.

Looking back at your iso, the last time you said anything about clark's alignment was this back on page 4

Clark is kinda null for me, that's why, Norris is just scummier.

Clark still should claim.

In post 491, Copper~ wrote:

In post 475, Fuchs~ wrote:

In post 79, Copper~ wrote:I don't think Clark is scum. Off-the-hip gut read.

Looking back at your iso, the last time you said anything about clark's alignment was this back on page 4

Clark is kinda null for me, that's why, Norris is just scummier.

what about norris do you think is scummy?

well that was enought ime for a claim VOTE: Clark

UNVOTE:
To make sure nothing untoward happens before a claim, but I am still on in spirit

Yeah, at this point a claim would be nice

lmao childs wildin

I'm a jailkeeper

In post 497, Norris~ wrote:lmao childs wildin

Agreed