In post 3255, Scioness Sajj wrote:VOTE: penguinpower
Don't scumread tbg, nor do I want another claim.
Will switched if needed.
so if you didn't want another claim why'd you choose to try and lynch someone else (which may lead to another claim) instead of lynching the incredibly convenient (due to the fact we already had multiple players for the "doc" to protect), atrocious doc fake claim?
In post 3255, Scioness Sajj wrote:VOTE: penguinpower
Don't scumread tbg, nor do I want another claim.
Will switched if needed.
so if you didn't want another claim why'd you choose to try and lynch someone else (which may lead to another claim) instead of lynching the incredibly convenient (due to the fact we already had multiple players for the "doc" to protect), atrocious doc fake claim?
Holy shit
VOTE: Tchill13
Posted: Thu Jul 26, 2018 5:30 pm
by Kublai Khan
wait, what?
Posted: Thu Jul 26, 2018 5:31 pm
by Kublai Khan
Why are you voting Tchill13 based on that?
Posted: Thu Jul 26, 2018 5:39 pm
by Tchill13
Yeah ik. Vote the logic amiright?
Posted: Thu Jul 26, 2018 5:40 pm
by Scioness Sajj
dude
Posted: Thu Jul 26, 2018 5:41 pm
by Krazy
Warning tchill, if you have fewer than 2000 posts by day 6, you might earn my vote.
You probably don't get it before then though lol Too much shady stuff in this game to vote based on activity/meta/bs.
Look back through Tchill's early posts since he entered the game
Then sheep me
Posted: Thu Jul 26, 2018 5:45 pm
by Tchill13
What's the warning? I'm failing to see where my logic is flawed and why.
Posted: Thu Jul 26, 2018 5:46 pm
by Tchill13
Quote them
Posted: Thu Jul 26, 2018 5:47 pm
by Ankamius
I'll give you a hint: He specifically hunted that post down to justify him being on the Sajj wagon today
The even juicier part: This increases Tchill's scum equity by a lot if Sajj ever flips scum.
Posted: Thu Jul 26, 2018 5:49 pm
by Tchill13
I did.
I specifically looked at my quote about the lurkers, a group, and seen what I had quoted above ssjj because I remembered him standing out.
Posted: Thu Jul 26, 2018 5:51 pm
by Krazy
Oh, I wasn't actually disagreeing with anything you said, but the sheer fact that you aren't posting 8 times every time anyone says anything has really thrown off my read of you LOL
In post 3255, Scioness Sajj wrote:VOTE: penguinpower
Don't scumread tbg, nor do I want another claim.
Will switched if needed.
so if you didn't want another claim why'd you choose to try and lynch someone else (which may lead to another claim) instead of lynching the incredibly convenient (due to the fact we already had multiple players for the "doc" to protect), atrocious doc fake claim?
In post 3242, Dunnstral wrote:What's wrong with you guys? I don't remember wheme being so scummy that we ignore good strategy and just lynch him through a doctor claim, I was under the impression that this was basically a lurker/lynchbait day.
Wheme isn't scummy around hammer, why would mafia claim dumb protect targets
If Wheme is mafia he gets caught later and we lynch him over any other doc claim if it comes to it
If we lynch doctor we lose our way to protect all these mason/ic that prematurely claimed (more bad town play but nothing I could do about it)
In post 3255, Scioness Sajj wrote:VOTE: penguinpower
Don't scumread tbg, nor do I want another claim.
Will switched if needed.
so if you didn't want another claim why'd you choose to try and lynch someone else (which may lead to another claim) instead of lynching the incredibly convenient (due to the fact we already had multiple players for the "doc" to protect), atrocious doc fake claim?
pp was already claimed vt lmao
fair point. I still SR Sajj though.
Posted: Thu Jul 26, 2018 5:57 pm
by Tchill13
I view PP as damn near conftown. So that doesn't really help @TBG.
Posted: Thu Jul 26, 2018 6:01 pm
by Scioness Sajj
In post 4773, Tchill13 wrote:I view PP as damn near conftown. So that doesn't really help @TBG.
what you thinking PP is conftown(???) has to do with that particular situation?