Page 191 of 277
Posted: Mon Dec 28, 2020 9:55 am
by Brian Skies
In post 4745, Titus wrote:Bolded is why I SR Brian. If he has a choice between losing his buddies to death or by turnstyle, which does he pick? Turnstyle. That's literally the crux of my case.
I would be intellectually dishonest to say the two are independent. The fact we need a scum elimination to have any shot at ICs makes it that much easier to tunnel.
I'll go through my ISO to show exactly how my read on you evolved.
Except I told you I had nothing to do with EITHER turnstile, and you've failed to prove why you think this is the case.
Which is why your reasoning is bullshit.
Posted: Mon Dec 28, 2020 9:56 am
by Titus
Being a lover, suggests a doc exists. 2 kpn suggests a doc exists.
Bell is fucking town.
Posted: Mon Dec 28, 2020 9:56 am
by Bell
Okay. Lover day 2 claim.
Maybe, probably real yeah?
Posted: Mon Dec 28, 2020 9:56 am
by Brian Skies
In post 4751, Titus wrote:Being a lover, suggests a doc exists. 2 kpn suggests a doc exists.
Bell is fucking town.
Not really.
A doc and lover can exist without the other just fine.
Posted: Mon Dec 28, 2020 9:56 am
by Spiffeh
Thank you for your endorsement Ceph I hope I can do you proud
Posted: Mon Dec 28, 2020 9:57 am
by Titus
In post 4750, Brian Skies wrote: In post 4745, Titus wrote:Bolded is why I SR Brian. If he has a choice between losing his buddies to death or by turnstyle, which does he pick? Turnstyle. That's literally the crux of my case.
I would be intellectually dishonest to say the two are independent. The fact we need a scum elimination to have any shot at ICs makes it that much easier to tunnel.
I'll go through my ISO to show exactly how my read on you evolved.
Except I told you I had nothing to do with EITHER turnstile, and you've failed to prove why you think this is the case.
Which is why your reasoning is bullshit.
You have everything to deal with both being turnstyled. Without you it cannot happen.
You could have kept your mouth shut and we turnstyle with more information and to be protown.
Instead, you rescue your team.
Posted: Mon Dec 28, 2020 9:57 am
by Bell
In post 4753, Brian Skies wrote: In post 4751, Titus wrote:Being a lover, suggests a doc exists. 2 kpn suggests a doc exists.
Bell is fucking town.
Not really.
A doc and lover can exist without the other just fine.
@Annie: does this post make sense to you?
Posted: Mon Dec 28, 2020 9:59 am
by Bell
It really really really eeallly reallllllllly doesn’t make sense to me.
I mean sure, we’ve had games with no doc or whatever in smoke filled.
Wait were you in that game.
But the balancing was all different was the conclusion i’m Skipping to the end here.
Posted: Mon Dec 28, 2020 10:00 am
by Brian Skies
In post 4755, Titus wrote:You have everything to deal with both being turnstyled. Without you it cannot happen.
You could have kept your mouth shut and we turnstyle with more information and to be protown.
Instead, you rescue your team.
So by me claiming my role I have to be scum and I picked for those to happen. Instead of you know, just launching null reads and outright eliminating scum.
Wow.
Just.
Wow.
Posted: Mon Dec 28, 2020 10:01 am
by Brian Skies
Bell, why do you believe a Lover implies the presence of a Doctor? And/or vice versa?
Posted: Mon Dec 28, 2020 10:01 am
by Bell
In post 4753, Brian Skies wrote: In post 4751, Titus wrote:Being a lover, suggests a doc exists. 2 kpn suggests a doc exists.
Bell is fucking town.
Not really.
A doc and lover can exist without the other just fine.
Yes, good point.
Now establish why Titus would do this as scum and i’ll Give you a medal.
You’re totally missing the forest for the trees here and it’s down right suspicious
Posted: Mon Dec 28, 2020 10:01 am
by Bell
In post 4759, Brian Skies wrote:Bell, why do you believe a Lover implies the presence of a Doctor? And/or vice versa?
Buddy. I am a doctor.
Posted: Mon Dec 28, 2020 10:02 am
by Bell
Uh, because claiming as lover day 2 is extremely stupid for scum Titus?
Posted: Mon Dec 28, 2020 10:02 am
by Brian Skies
What's your opinion on this, Bell?
Posted: Mon Dec 28, 2020 10:03 am
by Brian Skies
As claimed, her role doesn't even function with yours.
Posted: Mon Dec 28, 2020 10:03 am
by Titus
We're lovers if in the same timeline forward or inverted
Posted: Mon Dec 28, 2020 10:04 am
by Bell
I have no opinion merely my role pm showing he wrong. :=\
Posted: Mon Dec 28, 2020 10:04 am
by Spiffeh
I think I'm just going to ignore posts with role claims in them for the remainder of the game and pretend they never happened
Posted: Mon Dec 28, 2020 10:05 am
by Bell
Does it matter, what the fuck does scum Titus gain from this?
You can move back to me if you’d like but it won’t help you.
Posted: Mon Dec 28, 2020 10:05 am
by Hench Princesses
I thought this sounded really awkward and clumsy from a design perspective but now that I know they're lovers across time it sounds really romantic
-E
Posted: Mon Dec 28, 2020 10:06 am
by Brian Skies
So apparently Titus' role may function with Bell's.
Either way, idk why you think there can't be a scum lover.
Posted: Mon Dec 28, 2020 10:07 am
by Titus
@Spiffeh,
I had a bunch of quotes explaining my TR, but I really liked the Sass in your tone, you stopped scumreading my townreads, and you're still inquiring about me. I don't mind honest pushes at all.
Posted: Mon Dec 28, 2020 10:07 am
by Brian Skies
Like, I don't even care about her claim.
I think she's scum off of play.
Posted: Mon Dec 28, 2020 10:07 am
by Bell
In post 4770, Brian Skies wrote:So apparently Titus' role may function with Bell's.
Either way, idk why you think there can't be a scum lover.
Uhhh, where did I think that?
Lovers are not masons. I am aware. But i’m Asking how *scum* Titus benefits.
Posted: Mon Dec 28, 2020 10:08 am
by Hench Princesses
I 100% buy the role as real, I'm mulling over the likelihood of cakezzz putting a scum in a lovers pairing given the other mechanics in the game and it's not immediately obvious to me whether it spews one way or the other
maybe it should but it hasn't clicked yet
-E