Page 192 of 208

Posted: Sat Dec 21, 2013 6:03 am
by Lost Butterfly
Hey, upside down, it's been over twenty-four hours. I'll give you a grace period of eighteen more hours due to the site outage, because I'm forgiving like that!

If people would prefer they send it to someone like Muffin instead, speak now or forever hold your peace.
In post 4712, Garuda wrote:
In post 4710, ProHawk wrote:If you are so confident that scum is going to govern (and implicate themselves as scum) but still BUS at the same time you are out of your mind.
The two best things Nero-scum can do for his team are bus buddies and hammer townies. Nero being on a wagon automatically poisons it; surely you don't think he's dumb enough to realize that his presence on a wagon ruins everyone else's interpretation of it, especially taking into account how Eagle/Espeonage was resolved.
In post 4742, Garuda wrote:I'm starting to think eagle is town again. Neros reaction after Muffin-post suggests he didn't have any sort of clue that he was confirmed scum, and voting eagle during the counter wagons could have easily been nero not really caring which lynch went through since they were both town. I don't think eagle last two posts are scum eagle posts, and I think that Nero would be less likely to be double governed if the most obvious counter wagon was a scum wagon since obviously your wagon didn't have any legs.
Can you explain your thought process between these two posts? Most of this stuff happened before (except for eagle's posts). I don't like you suddenly hopping on the "Nero didn't realize he was confirmed scum" theory.

Posted: Sat Dec 21, 2013 7:00 am
by Magua
Vote Count 6.14


With 12 alive, it takes 7 to lynch.

Harakiri (3): ProHawk, Lord Mhork, penguin_alien
1baldeagle1 (3): Harakiri, Nero Cain, uʍop ǝpısdn
uʍop ǝpısdn (1): 1baldeagle1
Lost Butterfly (1): VoidedMafia

Not Voting (4): Lost Butterfly, zMuffinMan, BBmolla, Garuda

Deadline for Day 6 is Tuesday, December 24th, at 5:00pm EST (site time).
Countdown to deadline:
(expired on 2013-12-24 17:00:00)


Deadline for Day 6 is Friday, December 27th, at 5:00am EST (site time).
Countdown to deadline:
(expired on 2013-12-27 05:00:00)


36 hours added to deadline due to site outage.
24 hours added due to Christmas. Christmas will also not be counted for prods.

Posted: Sat Dec 21, 2013 7:39 am
by Lost Butterfly
<3 Magua
In post 4379, Garuda wrote:
In post 4354, Lost Butterfly wrote:Mhork is another early town read who's been sinking fast, but it's only today that I've started having doubts, and I'd rather wait and see if it's not just temporary apathy. I actually liked ProHawk's post-govern paranoid tinfoil hat posts enough to give him a reprieve for now.
These are two very good reads!
Garuda, here it seems like you're agreeing more with the Mhork-is-still-town part of this sentence. What changed?

(Also, Mhork's defence of Nero was way more convincing than ProHawk's, because his had actual emotion behind it. I thought ProHawk's was town
enough
to make me reluctant to lynch him that day, but I've seen scum cling to ridiculous or absurd theories about the game. Mhork's genuine anger is a lot harder to fake.)

Someone here keep me company. I'm lonely. :(

Posted: Sat Dec 21, 2013 7:44 am
by uʍop ǝpısdn
In post 4768, Lost Butterfly wrote:Wait.

I just realized there are very, very high chances (like, >50%) that the scumteams know each other now that Nero has been outed (unless Harakiri really didn't send his team's bids in and pieguyn won it, that is).

Hey, upside down. If you don't send me a message within the next twenty-four hours that says, "I am upside down, and I have not used my messenger shot, yet," you're getting lynched today.
This is out of character for you and weirdly confrontational. Why has it taken so long for you (or anyone I guess) to ask forthis? When I claimed, imade it cleat iwas willing to message someone to prove ihad it but no one even cated.

Posted: Sat Dec 21, 2013 7:49 am
by uʍop ǝpısdn
I apologise for that poorly written post. Once the post gets past a screen long, I can't see what I'm writing anymore until I hit submit.

Posted: Sat Dec 21, 2013 7:56 am
by Lost Butterfly
Earlier, it didn't matter as much, and other things distracted me. But now it just hit me that the scum have almost certainly messaged each other today (if not earlier in the game).

I want concrete proof that you haven't sent one today. If you can't provide this despite having claimed not to have sent one, then you're busted.

(Also, I'm a
lot
more confrontational than I look. :twisted:)

Posted: Sat Dec 21, 2013 8:40 am
by Lord Mhork
Harakiri I don't actually know what you're talking about. What cast-a-wide-net strategy? I've pretty much obeyed the plans until, like, the last couple nights.

Posted: Sat Dec 21, 2013 8:48 am
by Lost Butterfly
Oh!

Confirming reception of upside down's message. To answer your question, it doesn't prove anything, but it was worth a try.

Why didn't you say you were sending it in the thread?

Posted: Sat Dec 21, 2013 8:50 am
by Lost Butterfly
(What really would have proved something was you NOT sending a message.)

Posted: Sat Dec 21, 2013 10:46 am
by BBmolla
Lost Butterfly who are you guys feeling like voting

I'm still going to end up voting Hara in the current situation, your QT stuff only solidifies that.

Posted: Sat Dec 21, 2013 2:33 pm
by uʍop ǝpısdn
In post 4782, Lost Butterfly wrote:Oh!

Confirming reception of upside down's message. To answer your question, it doesn't prove anything, but it was worth a try.

Why didn't you say you were sending it in the thread?
What good would saying it in the thread be? (Also, I'll be honest: idon't fully understand how countermeasires works.)

Posted: Sat Dec 21, 2013 3:11 pm
by ProHawk
In post 4780, Lost Butterfly wrote:I want concrete proof that you haven't sent one today. If you can't provide this despite having claimed not to have sent one, then you're busted.
This is dumb. Messenger gets a 2x use.

Posted: Sat Dec 21, 2013 5:32 pm
by ProHawk
See LB, its these crazy lets use the game mechanics to clear people/scum hunt that just makes me think you are scum.

Posted: Sat Dec 21, 2013 7:58 pm
by Magua
I have given a friendly reminder that is certainly not a prod to those who have not posted since the site's returned.

Posted: Sat Dec 21, 2013 10:36 pm
by Garuda
Why the hell are you prodding me

Posted: Sat Dec 21, 2013 10:38 pm
by Garuda
In post 4749, Lost Butterfly wrote:Prod dodge because I have work and don't know if the the site will be down again the next time I try to post. But Garuda, the "correct" response was supposed to be, "Boy, actually, the Mhork part of the equation is off, because he looks obvtown right now!" (Granted, the trap could be seen a mile away by that point.)

Voided, that's really the best you can do?
What game are you reading?

Posted: Sat Dec 21, 2013 10:40 pm
by Garuda
In post 4750, penguin_alien wrote:Prohawk, still want to hear about why you think Harakiri is scum, but of the wagons going on right now, Harakiri does seem scummiest, and I'm not as convinced about eagle as I was before.

VOTE: Harakiri
Similar questions go here.

Posted: Sat Dec 21, 2013 10:40 pm
by Garuda
In post 4753, uʍop ǝpısdn wrote:
In post 4742, Garuda wrote:I'm starting to think eagle is town again. Neros reaction after Muffin-post suggests he didn't have any sort of clue that he was confirmed scum, and voting eagle during the counter wagons could have easily been nero not really caring which lynch went through since they were both town. I don't think eagle last two posts are scum eagle posts, and I think that Nero would be less likely to be double governed if the most obvious counter wagon was a scum wagon since obviously your wagon didn't have any legs.
Why are you even reading Nero's posts?
You don't find them as entertaining as I do?

Posted: Sat Dec 21, 2013 10:41 pm
by Garuda
Thought process = HAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Posted: Sat Dec 21, 2013 10:42 pm
by Garuda
In post 4777, Lost Butterfly wrote:<3 Magua
In post 4379, Garuda wrote:
In post 4354, Lost Butterfly wrote:Mhork is another early town read who's been sinking fast, but it's only today that I've started having doubts, and I'd rather wait and see if it's not just temporary apathy. I actually liked ProHawk's post-govern paranoid tinfoil hat posts enough to give him a reprieve for now.
These are two very good reads!
Garuda, here it seems like you're agreeing more with the Mhork-is-still-town part of this sentence. What changed?

(Also, Mhork's defence of Nero was way more convincing than ProHawk's, because his had actual emotion behind it. I thought ProHawk's was town
enough
to make me reluctant to lynch him that day, but I've seen scum cling to ridiculous or absurd theories about the game. Mhork's genuine anger is a lot harder to fake.)

Someone here keep me company. I'm lonely. :(
The whole sinking fast bit was the part that resonated with me. I didn't see any genuine anger from Mhrok at all.

Posted: Sat Dec 21, 2013 11:09 pm
by BBmolla
Why have you not solved the game yet

Posted: Sat Dec 21, 2013 11:46 pm
by Garuda
Mhork/LB/Nero/Penguin/VoidedMafia is all ugly feeling, especially when LB town becomes more and more apparent every moment scum doesn't quickhammer

Posted: Sun Dec 22, 2013 3:24 am
by penguin_alien
In post 4764, Lost Butterfly wrote:penguin_alien, uh, what exactly caused your sudden shift towards Harakiri, given that I don't think your slot has voiced any suspicion whatsoever of them all game and the only reason to do a sudden turnaround on them is because of the $1 bid (which you seemed to think "didn't convince you")?
Mostly wondering what would happen with increased pressure, and I was even less convinced of the eagle wagon.

Someone said that scum should be quickhammering these wagons; given that we're in multiball, why would one expect scum to tip their hand to their counterparts that way?

Posted: Sun Dec 22, 2013 6:04 am
by zMuffinMan
^V wrote:Molla and/or muffinman, how similar do you think nacho's play in this game is to his play in my game?
i don't really remember. i wasn't particularly engaged in that game, and a primary reason i suspected nacho near the end of it was poe and seeing a couple stances he was taking not make a lot of sense to me. and then there was his claim, too.
LB wrote:1) Nero's vote on eagle came after MULTIPLE PEOPLE ALREADY CALLED HIM CONFIRMED SCUM IN THE THREAD
yes and no. i was referring to his vote on eagle yesterday, as well. i think at the very end of the day yesterday, i even talked a little about why nero's vote on baldy made me hesitant about him. maybe. i don't remember
^V wrote:Why has it taken so long for you (or anyone I guess) to ask forthis? When I claimed, imade it cleat iwas willing to message someone to prove ihad it but no one even cated
i thought about it, but what would it verify other than you have at least one shot of it left OR if you are scum, whoever you claim to send it to could just be your scum buddy?
pa wrote:given that we're in multiball, why would one expect scum to tip their hand to their counterparts that way?
this seems fake

Posted: Sun Dec 22, 2013 8:40 am
by 1baldeagle1
Oh, the site finally came back.