Mafiascum.net

In post 4612, Firebringer wrote:Okay Brian I bet i know how to convince u.

Big announcement:
I am retracting my cop claim.

If we are talking about this post, I thought he was joking. Idk

Fire still would like to go over iirc

Also yes the retractment seemed half joke half wifom?

In post 4757, superbowl9 wrote:

In post 4753, Deacon Blues wrote:I can't think of a way to talk about this that isn't bad. If I'm wrong and Superbowl wants to correct me, fine.

I think you are wrong but also I'm not talking about it. And shame on you gamma for asking this what possible benefit could come from that?

there’s been talk of exposing the crumbs across the board so I felt clarity should be the objective

In post 4761, Deacon Blues wrote:

GFITAC wrote:alright. Most of that seems fair.
What about my claim pings you? I maaaybe can understand but it felt innocuous imo
debbie stated to me he thinks SS is scum, and I feel like with a lack of suspicions rn, and with no real hard vibe from SS, I think that's something I want to put out for discussion.
-BCCorp

Protective claims under duress always squick me a little because they play to town's wishful thinking. bodyguard is a claim that has a shelf life, which makes it less useful to scum for getting deep into the game, which is a mitigating point imo.

Who did you bodyguard last night?

I bodyguarded you.
-BCCorp

WRT fire’s claim+retraction I’m in the flavor-zone of “until I see something solid I’m not assuming anything”.
-BCCorp

In post 4778, GFITAC wrote:

In post 4757, superbowl9 wrote:

In post 4753, Deacon Blues wrote:I can't think of a way to talk about this that isn't bad. If I'm wrong and Superbowl wants to correct me, fine.

I think you are wrong but also I'm not talking about it. And shame on you gamma for asking this what possible benefit could come from that?

there’s been talk of exposing the crumbs across the board so I felt clarity should be the objective

In post 4761, Deacon Blues wrote:

GFITAC wrote:alright. Most of that seems fair.
What about my claim pings you? I maaaybe can understand but it felt innocuous imo
debbie stated to me he thinks SS is scum, and I feel like with a lack of suspicions rn, and with no real hard vibe from SS, I think that's something I want to put out for discussion.
-BCCorp

Protective claims under duress always squick me a little because they play to town's wishful thinking. bodyguard is a claim that has a shelf life, which makes it less useful to scum for getting deep into the game, which is a mitigating point imo.

Who did you bodyguard last night?

I bodyguarded you.
-BCCorp

@Dandelion,

Is it umbrella time?

In post 3579, Annie Edison wrote:@ffery I too am townreading gamma off of his play

Notsci I've got syry over irl and we are watching home alone and talking shit about you. I won't be posting until like midnight central sorry!

Hi a50!

I'm sticking with my guess. We can ask regus phillman who won the million dollars later.

In post 4784, Dandelion Wine wrote:I'm sticking with my guess. We can ask regus phillman who won the million dollars later.

Not sure what this is in reference to.

In post 4785, Deacon Blues wrote:

In post 4784, Dandelion Wine wrote:I'm sticking with my guess. We can ask regus phillman who won the million dollars later.

Not sure what this is in reference to.

You didnt watch "Who wants to be a millionaire"?

In post 4685, Firebringer wrote:

In post 4653, Dandelion Wine wrote:It's kind of sad that modern meta for crumbing is "make super obvious crumbs and pray only townies are smarter than a fifty grader" but here we are with half the setup already obvious.

ohh it was this.

and i wanted to do a rant about crumbs are bad.

one day people will come around to my philisophy of crumbs are dumb. One day.

i have never given a shit about crumbs.



i guess i find it funny that the reports from the PT have, like, detail and progression on certain people but on skitter it's like "omg so obvious how did you people not kill this" and nothing else. and i guess watcher + IC is an impossible setup design combo, because a watch-immune mafia member is too far fetched? i dunno. i'm not a setup designer though. and i had some issues day 1 but don't, like, really scumread her on play here. but i have no reason to believe my read is better than anyone else's. i was just expecting something more i suppose. i don't really buy the argument that she's a higher priority elim even if she is scum, though, because the desire to get turnstiled was clearly real so even if she is scum she's not doing shit over here.

In post 4773, midwaybear wrote:I've been lurking around. My reads are mostly the same. I'm pretty sure Firebringer is cop though?

UTBR

2/10

In post 4786, Dandelion Wine wrote:

In post 4785, Deacon Blues wrote:

In post 4784, Dandelion Wine wrote:I'm sticking with my guess. We can ask regus phillman who won the million dollars later.

Not sure what this is in reference to.

You didnt watch "Who wants to be a millionaire"?

That's not the part I don't get. The guess is.

In post 4787, petapan wrote:watcher + IC is an impossible setup design combo, because a watch-immune mafia member is too far fetched

these old players are just not very creative.

Purple room post 673. Bottom left of the four.

I'm going to bed. They're making us work tomorrow all day ;~(

In post 4790, Dandelion Wine wrote:Purple room post 673. Bottom left of the four.

I'm going to bed. They're making us work tomorrow all day ;~(

I'll sleep on the potential ramifications.

can u 2 stop with the codes. it got old really fast.

firebringer lets make our own code

In post 4793, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:firebringer lets make our own code

i think the narcs are onto us tho

i don't know if i want to be a narc and do a code like these narcs.

we gotta keep it hood

In post 4787, petapan wrote:detail and progression on certain people but on skitter it's like "omg so obvious how did you people not kill this" and nothing else. a

Yes, and it's very annoying

-

Is there a reason why today cant happen in the following order, or am i missing something:
1. Other thread turnstiles
2. other thread lims
3. Other thread does (or does not) get confed
(And im betting on the latter)
4 we turnstile
5. We lim

And we can decide on possibilities for 4 and 5 depending on how 3 shakes out *now*, so were not stuck rushing in the 48 hour deadline

And that way both the ' we want ti try for the ic plan' and ' we want to turnstile prs over' factions can get what they want

-

Aside, the gamestate is feeling weird and like ... expectant. Like scum want the current course to continue and have no reason to do much
(And my theory, of course, for why this is happening, is that they want us to waste time on this ic thing that they know isnt going to work)

Like scum in the other thread really arent trying too hard to prevent half the game from becoming ics