Posted: Tue Jul 12, 2022 3:12 pm
Mine
Because amongst other reasons, Marci has a very clear alignment based posting. Her posting in HDP is identical to Inviticus=scum, where as her posting in OMB is identical to this game=town. Plus this is town!Gamma based off again - that dreaded word - meta and he not only correctly read us but he did it for all of the right reasons.In post 4744, ProfessorDrapion wrote:Why is Hook not a wolf?In post 4699, Dancing Puppets wrote:I’m not fucking sheeping anyone who thinks us or Hook are ever wolves here.
Meaning I like seeing that logic coming from RH9.In post 4774, Lukewarm wrote:This is simultaneously not something that I think is a good way to sort me, but is also something that I absolutely think that RH9 believes to be true about my scum game.In post 4742, MathBlade wrote:Luke -> because Not acting like scum!Luke (i.e. not posting mainly meta and theory during early game which I associate with his scumgame)
Because my only scum game with him was a run of Guardians of the Fortress, which (in my opinion) the set up almost forces lots of theory based discussion on day 1 lol
Instead of continuing to scold me which is just further pissing me off, you could actually provide examples.In post 4745, Lukewarm wrote:In post 4738, Dancing Puppets wrote:<3 <3 <3In post 4676, Off The Hook wrote:this feels extremely presumptuousIn post 4668, Lukewarm wrote:Nancy thinks that someone being suspicious of her slot is equvelant to someone believing in QAnon Conspiracy theories, which is something that I think is pretty offensive ngl.In post 4666, Dunnstral wrote:The above post really confuses me
~GE
I’m getting really fed up with continually being lectured to and picked on by Luke. This is like the third time now and it isn’t okay.I’m not just going to say nothing when people are misrepping me, twisting my words, cherry picking things out of context and otherwise saying undulterated gatbage about me.
These are also all decent examples of saying that without including things that have real world damaging connotations like qanon.
I thought he was town early, but haven't really noticed his posting lately. I'm kind of out of it though, missed a lot of contentIn post 4772, JohnnyFarrar wrote:Not doing all that rn. This thread is chaos and I'm talking to people while they're here
@CSF thoughts on Dunn?
You mean the speedlim one? I'm guessing a misinterpretation of 3760In post 4771, ProfessorDrapion wrote:What about that wolfy Math Vote?In post 4766, Cat Scratch Fever wrote:uhhh have you weighed in on dunnstral? because a quick ctrl+f suggests noIn post 4755, JohnnyFarrar wrote:Drapion weigh in on dunnstral rn
p-edit: @ProfessorDrapion - I still think he's town. See the post you quoted
qanon is the example...In post 4778, Dancing Puppets wrote:Instead of continuing to scold me which is just further pissing me off, you could actually provide examples.In post 4745, Lukewarm wrote:In post 4738, Dancing Puppets wrote:<3 <3 <3In post 4676, Off The Hook wrote:this feels extremely presumptuousIn post 4668, Lukewarm wrote:Nancy thinks that someone being suspicious of her slot is equvelant to someone believing in QAnon Conspiracy theories, which is something that I think is pretty offensive ngl.In post 4666, Dunnstral wrote:The above post really confuses me
~GE
I’m getting really fed up with continually being lectured to and picked on by Luke. This is like the third time now and it isn’t okay.I’m not just going to say nothing when people are misrepping me, twisting my words, cherry picking things out of context and otherwise saying undulterated gatbage about me.
These are also all decent examples of saying that without including things that have real world damaging connotations like qanon.
What is your opinion of dunn?In post 4772, JohnnyFarrar wrote:Not doing all that rn. This thread is chaos and I'm talking to people while they're here
@CSF thoughts on Dunn?
You probably don’t intend this but you are being extremely hurtful. That’s all I’m going to say until I calm down. If you were not trying to do that you would try to provide helpful examples instead of constantly jumping on me.In post 4760, Lukewarm wrote:The only times I am aware of where I stepped in to "lecture you" was just now when you decided to compare someone's play to qanon and when you kept talking poorly about NotMafia, who is not in this game.In post 4745, Lukewarm wrote:In post 4738, Dancing Puppets wrote:<3 <3 <3In post 4676, Off The Hook wrote:this feels extremely presumptuousIn post 4668, Lukewarm wrote:Nancy thinks that someone being suspicious of her slot is equvelant to someone believing in QAnon Conspiracy theories, which is something that I think is pretty offensive ngl.In post 4666, Dunnstral wrote:The above post really confuses me
~GE
I’m getting really fed up with continually being lectured to and picked on by Luke. This is like the third time now and it isn’t okay.I’m not just going to say nothing when people are misrepping me, twisting my words, cherry picking things out of context and otherwise saying undulterated gatbage about me.
These are also all decent examples of saying that without including things that have real world damaging connotations like qanon.
Both of those made me uncomfortable.
So I let you know that they both did.
I do not believe that informing you how your words affected my comfort level is the same as picking on someone.
Not really? To many people and too many posts.In post 4753, JohnnyFarrar wrote:Luke have you been keeping track of who is and isn't responding about Dunn (is fine if you haven't, but i'm here to call out now)
To answer your q this is basically exactly where I am. Had a really hectic day and can totally see Dunn being scum, even with that good early posting. Dunn is a good player.In post 4779, Cat Scratch Fever wrote:I thought he was town early, but haven't really noticed his posting lately. I'm kind of out of it though, missed a lot of content
Idk I'd lim him ig, because again, I'd lim almost anyone
We both did.In post 4784, Dancing Puppets wrote:You probably don’t intend this but you are being extremely hurtful. That’s all I’m going to say until I calm down. If you were not trying to do that you would try to provide helpful examples instead of constantly jumping on me.In post 4760, Lukewarm wrote:The only times I am aware of where I stepped in to "lecture you" was just now when you decided to compare someone's play to qanon and when you kept talking poorly about NotMafia, who is not in this game.In post 4745, Lukewarm wrote:In post 4738, Dancing Puppets wrote:<3 <3 <3In post 4676, Off The Hook wrote:this feels extremely presumptuousIn post 4668, Lukewarm wrote:Nancy thinks that someone being suspicious of her slot is equvelant to someone believing in QAnon Conspiracy theories, which is something that I think is pretty offensive ngl.In post 4666, Dunnstral wrote:The above post really confuses me
~GE
I’m getting really fed up with continually being lectured to and picked on by Luke. This is like the third time now and it isn’t okay.I’m not just going to say nothing when people are misrepping me, twisting my words, cherry picking things out of context and otherwise saying undulterated gatbage about me.
These are also all decent examples of saying that without including things that have real world damaging connotations like qanon.
Both of those made me uncomfortable.
So I let you know that they both did.
I do not believe that informing you how your words affected my comfort level is the same as picking on someone.
As a follow up, do you believe that he earnestly thought Roden was lying about the Mason claim?In post 4792, RCEnigma wrote:Think Dunn is town and I’m not interested in elimming him today.