Mafiascum.net

.|.

In post 4799, DrDolittle wrote:

In post 4792, Dannflor wrote:like I don't understand the progression of

>>>

>>> [oops he's at L-1 nvm i dont wanna bus]

This happens quite a bit. I put a scum vote on my partner to create distance and look good on VCA in case he flips.
Oh shit, he's close to being lynched
Let me furtively unvote. A new wagon should be in the horizon.

yeah and looking back that was explicitly after rc said he's not interested in RCE

In post 4800, Tana and Ephraim wrote:.|.

ok

ok

like have i been on the receiving end of enough shit this game that i can stop pretending to take it with equanimity and actually express my feelings on it yet?

like have i been on the receiving end of enough shit this game that i can stop pretending to take it with equanimity and actually express my feelings on it yet?

Here's the case

In post 4635, Tana and Ephraim wrote:

In post 1645, DrDolittle wrote:Unless Eventide claims Clark Kent and can cop+autovig + revive a dead townie. I'm probably not unvoting here today. Most of her reads/votes are so terrible (e.g. one on Croag when there's so much action; the one on Dann that didn't make any sense, and as soon as dann response, she doesn't talk anymore), but this one takes the cake: there was like 1 or 2 votes on Bitmap + Dannflor was not instigating anything and telling everyone to calm down + needs a Bitmap Dann scumteam, which each by itself is relatively unlikely. I don't even know what to say about it.

[1]

i think that defining your unvote condition by a claim (which is effectively nai) is scummy and shows that you're not actually reading for alignment.

In post 1680, DrDolittle wrote:HH I want to ask you about RCE-scum

In post 1684, DrDolittle wrote:I don't understand your scum read on him. Looping back to your ISO, if I'm interpreting correctly
1 - RCE states the obvious (titus defends herself), or is applying faulty logic (townreading you for scumreading him)
3 - RCE brings up stuff from log time ago.
But these are not smoking guns, and could be very much a playstyle thing (needing to hash all the information). Why is he so big of a scum read to you?

[2]

DDL defends RcE as well and in a way that doesn't feel all that good faith

In post 1795, DrDolittle wrote:

In post 1778, Cafe Stile wrote:Lady Eventide - They're looking green for me. They're being a bit helpful to twon the way that Sailor Senshi does.

This is how I know you have at most skimmed.

Helpful to town is a gross overstatement. I can agree with there are gems in the rough if you wade through all the dirt but no more

Difference between that and SS is night and day

[3]

think this is both S indicative and SvS indicative.

In post 3401, DrDolittle wrote:i wonder whether CS giving the shot to you, gameplay, and the gamma shot was forced by CS, so that in EV terms, your shot is more likely to kill town

In post 3403, DrDolittle wrote:i think my posited scenario is likely, VOTE: CS

In post 3405, DrDolittle wrote:actually maybe not. I still have to figure out this whole CW neighborhood thing UNVOTE:

[4]

and then this is just not gr8

[1]: reading this is a clear hyperbole. I'm essentially saying I'm not unvoting LE, because clearly she's clearly not OP clark kent. Yet poor reading comprehension points to that I'm unvoting based on claims.

[2]: I ask about HH's RCE scumread. I don't defend him, and I don't think I have. I know for a fact that I don't read RCE well, and his playstyle pings scummy to me, and it's exactly what I bring up to understand. Keep in mind at that time I had HH as a town read, and RCE as largely null.

[3]: I too can pull up a random interaction between my top two scum reads and just call it "think this is both S indicative and SvS indicative." Thank you for your contribution and for coming to my ted talk. I'm pretty sure CS is flipping green too, and I'm really hoping the outcome of this game brings you an ego check. Like next time, when you say youre god gifts to mafia, we point to Magic girls and say wow but he was wrong 4 days in a row.

[4]: Me literally giving my transparent thought process on why I thought CS is potentially scum. There's the gameplay interaction and the CW interaction to process. There's me processing it. What's not great about it.

how is calling your case on me bad offensive in any way. Even if you disagree with [2] - [4], [1] is objectively a bad case

also when do you ever take it with " equanimity" and not "actually express my feelings on it"...

man

every other respected townie has been wrong at least 4 days in a row

yet i'm expected to hit scum on the earliest phases of the game with insane regularity and when i don't i get shit on for it?

In post 4808, DrDolittle wrote:also when do you ever take it with " equanimity" and not "actually express my feelings on it"...

i have kept my mouth shut about my feelings about a lot of things this game. do you wanna know what i actually feel about this game?

In post 4809, Tana and Ephraim wrote:every other respected townie has been wrong at least 4 days in a row

Yeah but you say shit like: wow I get day 1 right 60 percent of the time, and if i get day 1 wrong i get day 2 right 100 percent of the time, and ive never made it to day 3 and im the best scumhunter and gods gift in mafia.

literally this game.

In post 4799, DrDolittle wrote:

In post 4792, Dannflor wrote:like I don't understand the progression of

>>>

>>> [oops he's at L-1 nvm i dont wanna bus]

This happens quite a bit. I put a scum vote on my partner to create distance and look good on VCA in case he flips.
Oh shit, he's close to being lynched
Let me furtively unvote. A new wagon should be in the horizon.

well

that sounds like what a bad player would do

no offense

In post 4798, DrDolittle wrote:

In post 4793, Dannflor wrote:I thought you were scum reading CS yesterday tho

today new information came in

what was this information

like all these posts about bringing me an ego check. they're objectively, consistently, what scum hide behind to discredit me. read any of my recent games and see scum saying shit like that constantly to try to get my goat.
why do i have to deal with town making the exact same sort of obviously and objectively bad faith arguments scum do and be forced to try to sort whether they come from town or scum?

like no one believes this. no one believes that i'm not a good player. any sort of statistical argument precludes believing i'm good. so why do you say that shit anyway?

believing i'm not good.

In post 4813, Dannflor wrote:

In post 4798, DrDolittle wrote:

In post 4793, Dannflor wrote:I thought you were scum reading CS yesterday tho

today new information came in

what was this information

that psyche, it was RCE that was lynched days ago and HH is still alive.

In post 4812, Dannflor wrote:

In post 4799, DrDolittle wrote:

In post 4792, Dannflor wrote:like I don't understand the progression of

>>>

>>> [oops he's at L-1 nvm i dont wanna bus]

This happens quite a bit. I put a scum vote on my partner to create distance and look good on VCA in case he flips.
Oh shit, he's close to being lynched
Let me furtively unvote. A new wagon should be in the horizon.

well

that sounds like what a bad player would do

no offense

like my vote was clearly to wagon and lynch

it's not like

let me vanity wagon my scum buddy!!!1

most people when they see someone make a clearly bad faith argument get to assume that they're scum but i have to try and decide whether it's town who just hates me for out of game reasons or it's scum.

it's not a great position to be in!

In post 4817, DrDolittle wrote:

In post 4813, Dannflor wrote:

In post 4798, DrDolittle wrote:

In post 4793, Dannflor wrote:I thought you were scum reading CS yesterday tho

today new information came in

what was this information

that psyche, it was RCE that was lynched days ago and HH is still alive.

explain to me why this changed your read of CS

In post 4814, Tana and Ephraim wrote:like all these posts about bringing me an ego check. they're objectively, consistently, what scum hide behind to discredit me. read any of my recent games and see scum saying shit like that constantly to try to get my goat.
why do i have to deal with town making the exact same sort of obviously and objectively bad faith arguments scum do and be forced to try to sort whether they come from town or scum?

how are any of the arguments I make bad faith? Maybe against [3], but there's nothing I else I can say about it in good faith

like if people like LE would actually put the slightest mental effort into assuming i'm genuinely trying to read them and make a genuine attempt to convince me that they're town i wouldn't end up mislynching them
but instead they chose to call me several combinations of scum, asshole, bad human being, person who sexualizes the role of mislynching them, etcetera and never actually tried to talk to me as a human ebing

I believe you are good, in fact one of the best, but you just go screeching everytime someone has an alternative opinion, and start bring out how good you are and thats so annoying. why can't i be happy that that "how good you are" would be knocked down a bit in the future

i'm only as respected as my performance dictates and probably respected a lot less than my performance dictates given the general distaste a lot of people seem to have for em.