Mafiascum.net

It’s honestly really hard to poke people to see certain things without saying those certain things and seeing why they don’t kill X without saying Y. If this at all makes sense. Super Bowl asked me not to hint more so I think that’s all I can safely do.

In post 4799, MathBlade wrote:Can I say my thing now?

Go ahead.. but only if you promise to keep the pants on, Hell, tighten the belt too to make sure they don't incidentally fall off your waste.

In post 4804, MathBlade wrote:If you’re still wanting more responses that is to that A50. There is another flaw to your block too.

I also think for the record removing those two is stupid but your call King Absolute

OK. Now I'm intrigued!

In post 4826, Almost50 wrote:

In post 4799, MathBlade wrote:Can I say my thing now?

Go ahead.. but only if you promise to keep the pants on, Hell, tighten the belt too to make sure they don't incidentally fall off your waste.

Hahahaha lmao

It may depend how the mod handles disloyal too for 3P.

Some mods say that disloyal is anything other than your exact alignment.

Which means that y’all could be funneled cop checks all day long which would be bad for scum.

The wiki only talks about what is normal for town and mafia.

In post 4827, Almost50 wrote:

In post 4804, MathBlade wrote:If you’re still wanting more responses that is to that A50. There is another flaw to your block too.

I also think for the record removing those two is stupid but your call King Absolute

OK. Now I'm intrigued!

Imho you shouldn’t remove someone from a scum block for being honest. As scum I have used that trick many times to get out of situations. You should remove them if they’re honest and you get severe townpings. I only got honesty not town pings.

I would really appreciate if people would stop ignoring what I say.

In post 4812, MathBlade wrote:

In post 4605, TheGoldenParadox wrote:

In post 4597, MathBlade wrote:

In post 4596, TheGoldenParadox wrote:

In post 4593, Almost50 wrote:But what does that hint to you?? Anyone? I'll keep my answer to myself for the meantime and let you all respond first. I want to see who thinks what, please.

i'd think it means that they have some reliable way to figure out PRs and believe they can know the identity of another PR by tomorrow night.

Yeah it’s shit like this I would want to wagon.

It seems “TMI”.

What this normally would be IMO is a struggling newbie scum team that doesn’t understand NAR.

what scumteam in this PL doesn't understand NAR? what?

This is TGPs.

Yours is still in progress.

@DS I didn’t?

In post 4822, MathBlade wrote:

In post 4821, Almost50 wrote:

In post 4782, MathBlade wrote:It seems way too focused and matches my theory I have.

Can you elaborate in those?

P-edit: Just the post containing the warning/ Thanks

Welcome.

Can you clarify your question? Do you mean elaborate how TGP’s questions seem narrowed to my theory? If not can you restate?

No, I just wanted to know what questions those where and see if I can see it your way without you having to explain, Just the questions, please.

In post 4823, MathBlade wrote:This one is the most blatant. A lot of people have been asking “what is your win con” over and over and over. This one is a bit too specific if you get my drift.

Ah, OK. I now DO see your point.

In post 4596, TheGoldenParadox wrote:

In post 4593, Almost50 wrote:But what does that hint to you?? Anyone? I'll keep my answer to myself for the meantime and let you all respond first. I want to see who thinks what, please.

i'd think it means that they have some reliable way to figure out PRs and believe they can know the identity of another PR by tomorrow night.

While not really a question per se it is again too specific.

I think there was one other question iirc if I remember I will come back to it.

A lot of this stuff I can’t comment on directly.

And I think you know why.

This may contribute to Nero thinking I am not hunting.

I assure you I am. I know it’s lame sauce just a blanket assurance but meh. It’s what I got.

In post 4828, MathBlade wrote:It may depend how the mod handles disloyal too for 3P.

Some mods say that disloyal is anything other than your exact alignment.

Which means that y’all could be funneled cop checks all day long which would be bad for scum.

That was part of why I thought S_S redeemed himself with his NK analysis, yes. He pointed out that Plus could've handed us the Cop shot.

In post 4836, Almost50 wrote:

In post 4828, MathBlade wrote:It may depend how the mod handles disloyal too for 3P.

Some mods say that disloyal is anything other than your exact alignment.

Which means that y’all could be funneled cop checks all day long which would be bad for scum.

That was part of why I thought S_S redeemed himself with his NK analysis, yes. He pointed out that Plus could've handed us the Cop shot.

Ah I stand corrected I missed that Smart said that. I just thought that said it could be handed out still.

Sleepy MathBlade Derps again

In post 4829, MathBlade wrote:You should remove them if they’re honest and you get severe townpings.

Well, there's the problem: I do NOT count much on "pings" either way. I am a documented logical/mechanical player. (I almost never understand skitter's reads because the majority of them a are "feels like..". Also in my hydra with Chara they get to do all the "tone reads" while I handle the mechanical stuff)

I will not "totally" rule themn out, but I was talking about my TODAY execution pool.

In post 4838, Almost50 wrote:

In post 4829, MathBlade wrote:You should remove them if they’re honest and you get severe townpings.

Well, there's the problem: I do NOT count much on "pings" either way. I am a documented logical/mechanical player. (I almost never understand skitter's reads because the majority of them a are "feels like..". Also in my hydra with Chara they get to do all the "tone reads" while I handle the mechanical stuff)

I will not "totally" rule themn out, but I was talking about my TODAY execution pool.

Ah Cool. Same page then. The airport above my head where points come to land has completed construction. *chuckle*

In post 4830, DiamondSentinel wrote:I would really appreciate if people would stop ignoring what I say.

What did you say that we seemingly ignored?

Also, sorry if it feels that way, but I'm having difficulty reading you, AND you are not posting much.

But I promise to do a quick ISO of you soon to see what I missed (unless you want to be gracious enough to quote or restate.)

Plus skitter is like amazing. They’re one of the best players town and scum. I almost never lock town them unless I have a cop clear.

@MathBlade what's the meaning behind your title tech support?

In post 4842, NorwegianboyEE wrote:@MathBlade what's the meaning behind your title tech support?

It’s because before I retired/semi retired I did answer some questions in the tech forum and was working on the php upgrade before my laptop was hanging on by pins and needles. I also built a votecounter that can be downloaded and used. Some players object to its use even though everything is public and the source code is freely available so I don’t use it here.

In post 4828, MathBlade wrote:Some mods say that disloyal is anything other than your exact alignment.

There's another definition of disloyal besides this? That's news to me.

In post 4844, Something_Smart wrote:

In post 4828, MathBlade wrote:Some mods say that disloyal is anything other than your exact alignment.

There's another definition of disloyal besides this? That's news to me.

Some sites/F2F require 0 loyalty as in polar opposites.
Especially useful in games with circular multiball.

In post 4836, Almost50 wrote:He pointed out that Plus could've handed us the Cop shot.

I don't think I was the first person to point this out, though. I thought somebody said it yesterday.

Eg if you draw a square and label each corner clockwise A B C D disloyal would only work for A&C and B&D

In post 4846, Something_Smart wrote:

In post 4836, Almost50 wrote:He pointed out that Plus could've handed us the Cop shot.

I don't think I was the first person to point this out, though. I thought somebody said it yesterday.

How could someone point it out yesterday? Plus wasn’t dead yesterday and A50 asked the question today?

Are players time travelers?

In post 4771, Morning Mage wrote:

In post 4688, DrDolittle wrote:Superbowl9: yes I believe that schadd designed a 23p large with 5scum that may not be able to kill and a bunch of town siding 3p that gives great power roles. What a joy that is and thus norwegian boy is innocent

i'm not averse to flipping this i guess

We can do that tomorrow. JJH should flip today. I mean mastina setup specing him basically confirms him as scum anyways