Posted: Tue Mar 15, 2022 7:01 am
Protective roles stay on Math or else, btw.
It means you’re more likely than not siding with scumIn post 4824, VP Baltar wrote:In post 4820, fireisredsir wrote:i forgot that masons are given a list of alignments along with their role pm, mb
You worded this much better than I did. So clean and simple to understand too.In post 4821, Titus wrote:Town=/=correct.In post 4814, MathBlade wrote:The fact you’re arguing against a fucking mason who says the slot is town and has said so repeatedly should tell you this flips town
Conftown are high targets for agency capture.
It means town > rand odds of being on the right wagonIn post 4827, April Ludgate wrote:You worded this much better than I did. So clean and simple to understand too.In post 4821, Titus wrote:Town=/=correct.In post 4814, MathBlade wrote:The fact you’re arguing against a fucking mason who says the slot is town and has said so repeatedly should tell you this flips town
Conftown are high targets for agency capture.
I'd let a protective target elsewhere. #wifomIn post 4825, tenebrousluminary wrote:Protective roles stay on Math or else, btw.
Lol nah dawgIn post 4825, tenebrousluminary wrote:Protective roles stay on Math or else, btw.
NoIn post 4830, Nero Cain wrote:Math just hammer Malcolm. If he's town we get to go ape shit on his voters and if he's scum then we are closer to our wincon.
Titus and VP now both caught trying to pocket fire EoD FYI, switch wagons to VP.In post 4822, Titus wrote:I like you.In post 4820, fireisredsir wrote:i forgot that masons are given a list of alignments along with their role pm, mb
Same as ever:In post 4831, Titus wrote:Tene, thoughts on wagons?
It's pointless for them to do so.In post 4834, Frogsterking wrote:Titus and VP now both caught trying to pocket fire EoD FYI, switch wagons to VP.In post 4822, Titus wrote:I like you.In post 4820, fireisredsir wrote:i forgot that masons are given a list of alignments along with their role pm, mb
Hey, Tene. I defended you super hard at the beginning of the day, and your inverse scum read is the wagon I want, wanna hammer it?In post 4835, tenebrousluminary wrote:Same as ever:In post 4831, Titus wrote:Tene, thoughts on wagons?
VP is scum
Malcolm might be scum if I'm wrong but I would prefer the other options
I moved off Galron solely because of Yeet
I haven't thought very hard about who is where and whether that bothers me.
If Malcolm is town as I suspect fucking vig BoonIn post 4837, April Ludgate wrote:Hey, Tene. I defended you super hard at the beginning of the day, and your inverse scum read is the wagon I want, wanna hammer it?In post 4835, tenebrousluminary wrote:Same as ever:In post 4831, Titus wrote:Tene, thoughts on wagons?
VP is scum
Malcolm might be scum if I'm wrong but I would prefer the other options
I moved off Galron solely because of Yeet
I haven't thought very hard about who is where and whether that bothers me.
I won't defend VPB tomorrow if I'm wrong.
Fire thinks it could be both of them anyways.
I'm not ready to give in quite yet, but if the latest surge of VP votes fails, I can hammer.In post 4837, April Ludgate wrote:Hey, Tene. I defended you super hard at the beginning of the day, and your inverse scum read is the wagon I want, wanna hammer it?In post 4835, tenebrousluminary wrote:Same as ever:In post 4831, Titus wrote:Tene, thoughts on wagons?
VP is scum
Malcolm might be scum if I'm wrong but I would prefer the other options
I moved off Galron solely because of Yeet
I haven't thought very hard about who is where and whether that bothers me.
I won't defend VPB tomorrow if I'm wrong.
Fire thinks it could be both of them anyways.
Do we compete? Or do we collaborate and pocket everyone together?In post 4836, April Ludgate wrote:It's pointless for them to do so.In post 4834, Frogsterking wrote:Titus and VP now both caught trying to pocket fire EoD FYI, switch wagons to VP.In post 4822, Titus wrote:I like you.In post 4820, fireisredsir wrote:i forgot that masons are given a list of alignments along with their role pm, mb
Fire's cozy in my pocket.
Everyone's susceptible to a good pocket, people are just got in different ways.In post 4838, fireisredsir wrote:it will never work!! i am unpocketable!!! i am strongggg!!!
Spoiler:
What are the odds of you voting VP over Malcolm?In post 4838, fireisredsir wrote:it will never work!! i am unpocketable!!! i am strongggg!!!
Spoiler:
LOL half the Malcolm wagon is trying to pocket fireIn post 4836, April Ludgate wrote:It's pointless for them to do so.In post 4834, Frogsterking wrote:Titus and VP now both caught trying to pocket fire EoD FYI, switch wagons to VP.In post 4822, Titus wrote:I like you.In post 4820, fireisredsir wrote:i forgot that masons are given a list of alignments along with their role pm, mb
Fire's cozy in my pocket.
We have smiles and I'll bring us scum tmo if this fails.In post 4838, fireisredsir wrote:it will never work!! i am unpocketable!!! i am strongggg!!!
Spoiler:
I'm afraid to collab with you in case you get paranoid of thinking I'm trying to pocket you, but I don't mind hopping in your pocket for a bit.In post 4841, Titus wrote:Do we compete? Or do we collaborate and pocket everyone together?In post 4836, April Ludgate wrote:It's pointless for them to do so.In post 4834, Frogsterking wrote:Titus and VP now both caught trying to pocket fire EoD FYI, switch wagons to VP.In post 4822, Titus wrote:I like you.In post 4820, fireisredsir wrote:i forgot that masons are given a list of alignments along with their role pm, mb
Fire's cozy in my pocket.
I don't want to compete.
very slim at the moment but as soon as april leaves the thread the spell will be broken and i shall awake, dazed and confusedIn post 4843, MathBlade wrote:What are the odds of you voting VP over Malcolm?
actual answer tho is that i scumread more people off the malc wagon than people on itIn post 4847, fireisredsir wrote:very slim at the moment but as soon as april leaves the thread the spell will be broken and i shall awake, dazed and confusedIn post 4843, MathBlade wrote:What are the odds of you voting VP over Malcolm?