Page 195 of 220

Posted: Thu Sep 26, 2019 12:03 pm
by DrDolittle
im glad to hear that titus.

Posted: Thu Sep 26, 2019 12:06 pm
by Tana and Ephraim
In post 4849, DrDolittle wrote:
In post 4839, Sailor Senshi wrote:I don’t like how DDL is pushing what reads to me like an NAI thing this hard.
on the contrary the information from wow RCE is lynched instead of HH is key in breaking apart this game.
if you're town you don't even know what alignment HH is.

Posted: Thu Sep 26, 2019 12:08 pm
by DrDolittle
It's not due to asymmetry in information of HH's alignment. It's about asymmetry in how much does town vs scum care about RCE surviving. And that is public knowledge.

Posted: Thu Sep 26, 2019 12:09 pm
by Tana and Ephraim
funny because my argument is that scum didn't intend to keep RcE alive and you trying to make the game a question of who tried to keep RcE alive plays exactly into that.

Posted: Thu Sep 26, 2019 12:12 pm
by DrDolittle
at day 2 it was 11 v 3 with 3 or 4 conf towns. You think scum pushes another partner so casually under the bus to make it 10 v 2 which is almost mountainous? No they take fight every mislynch they can get

Posted: Thu Sep 26, 2019 12:14 pm
by Katsuki
In post 4845, Tana and Ephraim wrote:
In post 4842, Katsuki wrote:
In post 4840, Tana and Ephraim wrote:le deserved to be mislynched if only for attempting to gaslight me for not breaking site rules in the attempt to convince people that they were scum and declaring 1v1s with 3 separate people who are now confirmed town.

Did they actually do all that rofl
yes

gaslighting refers to their engagement with me refusing to cite information from the ongoing scum game on MU
i don't remember who exactly the 3 were but i remember 1 was bitmap
To be fair, they did a solid job in convincing me that I'm scum, I hadn't realized until they engaged me.

Posted: Thu Sep 26, 2019 12:21 pm
by DrDolittle
In post 4846, DrDolittle wrote:
In post 4834, DrDolittle wrote:4811 is a perfectly reasonable response to 4809. and 4807 is right. Or tell me why [1] is "good" in any way
I'm waiting for a response to this, in why 4811 and 4807 is done in bad faith
This is my last time quoting this in case you missed it. I'm fine if you don't want to respond to it, and i won't bring it up anymore

Posted: Thu Sep 26, 2019 12:22 pm
by DrDolittle
In post 4855, Katsuki wrote:To be fair, they did a solid job in convincing me that I'm scum, I hadn't realized until they engaged me.
then you read your role pm?

Posted: Thu Sep 26, 2019 12:52 pm
by Katsuki
Ya, then I asked Giffy for an amended role PM.

Posted: Thu Sep 26, 2019 1:03 pm
by DrDolittle
Careful SS Mars might report you to the list mod for bending the rules

Posted: Thu Sep 26, 2019 1:09 pm
by Sailor Senshi
In post 4843, DrDolittle wrote:its a joke... about how bad you are recognizing jokes. in particular about how kats is joking about shooting rc... that you missed yet again
Kats is making jokes, you otoh, are just running around like a chicken with its head cut off, jumping at any ludicrous opportunity to discredit me. :yawn:

Posted: Thu Sep 26, 2019 1:10 pm
by Sailor Senshi
In post 4847, Titus wrote:Surgery went fine. Docs recommend no attention to detail for 24 hours. Excuse sloppiness. Obviously no VCA until Friday minimum.

Co-host all games.
<3

Posted: Thu Sep 26, 2019 1:12 pm
by Sailor Senshi
In post 4849, DrDolittle wrote:
In post 4839, Sailor Senshi wrote:I don’t like how DDL is pushing what reads to me like an NAI thing this hard.
on the contrary the information from wow RCE is lynched instead of HH is key in breaking apart this game.
I was referring to the Dann unvoting thing.

Posted: Thu Sep 26, 2019 1:15 pm
by Sailor Senshi
In post 4853, Tana and Ephraim wrote:funny because my argument is that scum didn't intend to keep RcE alive and you trying to make the game a question of who tried to keep RcE alive plays exactly into that.
In post 4409, GuyInFreezer wrote:
VC 2.04
Tana and Ephraim (0):

Hidden Happiness (0):

Croag (1):
Titus, gameplay506
Bitmap (0):

RCEnigma (8):
DrDoLittle (3880), gameplay506 (4006), Tana and Ephraim (4104), Dannflor (4105), Hidden Happiness (4120), Cafe Stile (4127), Sailor Senshi (4146)
Dannflor (0):

Sailor Senshi (0):

Cafe Stile (0):

popsofctown (0):

DrDoLittle (0):

Titus (0):

Lady Lambdadelta (0):

gameplay506 (0):

Katsuki (0):


Not Voting:
Lady Lambdadelta, Croag, RCEnigma, Katsuki, popsofctown, Bitmap


With 14 alive, 8 to lynch


Deadline: (expired on 2019-10-05 11:25:26)
Definitely looks that way to me, since I think scum bussed.

Posted: Thu Sep 26, 2019 1:16 pm
by Sailor Senshi
In post 4855, Katsuki wrote:
In post 4845, Tana and Ephraim wrote:
In post 4842, Katsuki wrote:
In post 4840, Tana and Ephraim wrote:le deserved to be mislynched if only for attempting to gaslight me for not breaking site rules in the attempt to convince people that they were scum and declaring 1v1s with 3 separate people who are now confirmed town.

Did they actually do all that rofl
yes

gaslighting refers to their engagement with me refusing to cite information from the ongoing scum game on MU
i don't remember who exactly the 3 were but i remember 1 was bitmap
To be fair, they did a solid job in convincing me that I'm scum, I hadn't realized until they engaged me.
:lol:

Posted: Thu Sep 26, 2019 1:17 pm
by DrDolittle
In post 4860, Sailor Senshi wrote:
In post 4843, DrDolittle wrote:its a joke... about how bad you are recognizing jokes. in particular about how kats is joking about shooting rc... that you missed yet again
Kats is making jokes, you otoh, are just running around like a chicken with its head cut off, jumping at any ludicrous opportunity to discredit me. :yawn:
In post 4836, DrDolittle wrote:
In post 4833, Katsuki wrote:
In post 4809, Tana and Ephraim wrote:man

every other respected townie has been wrong at least 4 days in a row

yet i'm expected to hit scum on the earliest phases of the game with insane regularity and when i don't i get shit on for it?
stfu I'm the personification of perfection. :]
Hold up SS Mars might come in and tell you all the time you've been wrong.
you wanna tell me how this sequence above discredits you?

Posted: Thu Sep 26, 2019 1:17 pm
by Sailor Senshi
In post 4859, DrDolittle wrote:Careful SS Mars might report you to the list mod for bending the rules
:roll:

Are you done yet with this nonsensical bullshit discredit? It isn’t making you look any townier.

Posted: Thu Sep 26, 2019 1:19 pm
by DrDolittle
dis·cred·it
/disˈkredət/
verb
harm the good reputation of (someone or something).

Which of your reputation did I harm

Posted: Thu Sep 26, 2019 1:20 pm
by Sailor Senshi
In post 4865, DrDolittle wrote:
In post 4860, Sailor Senshi wrote:
In post 4843, DrDolittle wrote:its a joke... about how bad you are recognizing jokes. in particular about how kats is joking about shooting rc... that you missed yet again
Kats is making jokes, you otoh, are just running around like a chicken with its head cut off, jumping at any ludicrous opportunity to discredit me. :yawn:
In post 4836, DrDolittle wrote:
In post 4833, Katsuki wrote:
In post 4809, Tana and Ephraim wrote:man

every other respected townie has been wrong at least 4 days in a row

yet i'm expected to hit scum on the earliest phases of the game with insane regularity and when i don't i get shit on for it?
stfu I'm the personification of perfection. :]
Hold up SS Mars might come in and tell you all the time you've been wrong.
you wanna tell me how this sequence above discredits you?
No you’re right, you were actually paying me a compliment here and I failed to get the joke.

Posted: Thu Sep 26, 2019 1:21 pm
by DrDolittle
wouldnt be the first time that happened!
but really glad you get it now!! :]

Posted: Thu Sep 26, 2019 1:22 pm
by Sailor Senshi
In post 4867, DrDolittle wrote:dis·cred·it
/disˈkredət/
verb
harm the good reputation of (someone or something).

Which of your reputation did I harm
That’s
slander
.

Are you seriously going to force me to post the dictionary definition?

Posted: Thu Sep 26, 2019 1:23 pm
by Sailor Senshi
In post 4869, DrDolittle wrote:wouldnt be the first time that happened!
but really glad you get it now!! :]
Yes, thank you for showing me that I’m just not intelligent enough to get your “jokes”.

Posted: Thu Sep 26, 2019 1:25 pm
by DrDolittle
Image
I too like
slandering
the official dictionary definition.

Posted: Thu Sep 26, 2019 1:25 pm
by DrDolittle
In post 4871, Sailor Senshi wrote:
In post 4869, DrDolittle wrote:wouldnt be the first time that happened!
but really glad you get it now!! :]
Yes, thank you for showing me that I’m just not intelligent enough to get your “jokes”.
You're welcome!! :cool: :cool:

Posted: Thu Sep 26, 2019 1:47 pm
by Titus
In post 4870, Sailor Senshi wrote:
In post 4867, DrDolittle wrote:dis·cred·it
/disˈkredət/
verb
harm the good reputation of (someone or something).

Which of your reputation did I harm
That’s
slander
.

Are you seriously going to force me to post the dictionary definition?
A discredit is not slander if the discredit is truthful.