Posted: Fri Feb 04, 2022 2:43 pm
loads, ive been scum like 400 times in my last 401 games.In post 4849, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Ceph do you have any scumgames i can look at.
I feel like that’s the most lazt but solvey thing i can do atm.
loads, ive been scum like 400 times in my last 401 games.In post 4849, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Ceph do you have any scumgames i can look at.
I feel like that’s the most lazt but solvey thing i can do atm.
In post 3209, Tet wrote:I can see benecoff TV fitting Tictac thematically but that does nothing for alignment. The point in his favor is claiming first post.
Now that we know scum have a roleblocker he could have easily kept the ascetic modifier to himself and passed blame on to a roleblocker if investigated.
That said I would like the votes to move back on to Twie so we don't miss scum today, please and thank you.
You're town. Just paranoid.In post 4832, Andante wrote:I don't like Mala's shade here... I was already suspicious of mala before, but it was like not even game related for why I SRed, but now it's like, all this "I don't trust Andante's vote hopping" uh what?
Sounds like a threat, or at least an 8th grade filmstrip title.
Ceph doesn't need to make this post as scum. Ceph occasionally sees the points I'm trying to make all game, and moments like these feel real and hard to fake as scum. If he just wants to mis-elim me, having doubts like these just weaken the push.In post 1124, Cephrir wrote:i guess with this post i may have somewhat conceded the point on this particular one but it is interesting that this just keeps happening with only you and not anyone else.In post 1123, Cephrir wrote:Surely you can admit how these two things are incredibly similar so why are we jumping down my throat for reading it this way.In post 1111, Roden wrote:I'm saying itIn post 1110, Save The Dragons wrote:i think you missed the point
you called us sus and organized but then got in a twist when we were like "so you think we're mafia" so I guess i'm trying to figure out what you meant by sus and organized if you didn't mean you thought we were mafia togetherlooksthat way! I already said I don't think you're scum but your actions come off as scummy.
In post 1190, Cephrir wrote:i mentioned him here and there
i feel like he gets elimed early a lot and i'm not sure i fully understand why everyone is so fixated on him.
i think i'm more interested in the equally boring behavior coming from a slot (arcade) that is occupied by players i think of as capable
In post 1333, Cephrir wrote:arcade, i guess?In post 1332, The Three Bears wrote:besides rodenIn post 1329, Cephrir wrote:if you really have to ask this, i question whether you are reading the game.In post 1321, The Three Bears wrote:cephy if you could dayvig someone who wasn't me right now, who would it be
I feel like this spews him as town. It doesn't make any sense to try to stop a wagon on one scum buddy to just bus a different one instead. And it wasn't like Dunn was just a Goon, his role was pretty strong, so I don't see it as a sacrifice play.In post 1446, Cephrir wrote:You're allowed to be bothered.
Idk, this push got me to iso arcade and discover that it was unimpressive, maybe you could do the same?
In post 1344, Roden wrote:Do you not see that I have done the exact same thing? Or that you just did the exact same thing you accused me of?In post 1341, Cephrir wrote:to defend myself against the aspersions being cast on my characterIn post 1336, Roden wrote:What is the point of posts like these if not to start another shit fight?In post 1331, Cephrir wrote:ah yes i too remember when i drove to your house and held a gun to your head to force you to respond to a comment that wasn't directed at youIn post 1324, Roden wrote:Ceph took a pot shot at me over a read Mastina made earlier and reignited our shit fight
Another moment where Ceph relented when he didn't have to if he were scum.In post 1346, Cephrir wrote:i guess :/
This is just a genuinely good post.In post 1719, Cephrir wrote:Then what is your explanation for him not being dead yet?In post 1660, tictac wrote:too much consensus on irch
This AtE makes no sense as scum, and it reads as genuine to me.In post 3614, Cephrir wrote:there is nuance going on here that doesnt make sense to explain but youre so obsessed with thinking im a fuckhead that you cant trust me for 2 seconds and do something harmless safdjhfsdjhkl
no it's not a slam dunk either way but this is valuable info and im getting "lol, info??? whats the use of that fuckhead?"
I think he truly believed in the theory he had about Tet investigating the Bears, which to me means he's actually trying to solve the game. Like I can't read this and think there was a scum agenda at play.In post 3645, Cephrir wrote:i couldnt POSSIBLY have been clearer that im not doing this to kill you
i didn't say flavor broke, stop putting words in my mouth
it is actually beyond belief that what im doing right now is causing me to be suspected more i actually cant with you people
No? What makes you think I did?
WOW.. I am very glad my letter did not say that!!! Otherwise... no sleeping for me...In post 4864, NorwegianboyEE wrote:A threat would have been:
"Dear Andante
You better sleep with one eye open tonight. Or your next nap might become your last.
From Norwegianboy."
You have Dragons very low? Dragons is definitely town. Like, after rereading stuff, I never see Dragons as maf here.. please explain why you have dragons so lowIn post 4869, tictac wrote:Andante, NorwegianboyEE, Roden, Malakittens, The Three Bears,catboi, Cephrir (no particular order but all town)
Toogeloo,
mastina,
Save the Dragons
Galron,
bears would drop significantly on galron scumflip 4 obv reasons.
mastina would be town on bears scumflip (basically mastina doesn't believe noraa busses, so scum-noraa would only bus in town-mastina world)
galron is the only flip i'd prefer to my own currently.
so, are we still waiting 4 someone to do things, or can we make this me vs galron and end the day?
In post 1660, tictac wrote:i don't buy that std believes the populist crap he's pushing. he is the kind of player who does not make reads easily because "is this AI" is a consideration. all i'm reading from him is "is this a thing i can push and people will agree". like looking 4 logical inconsisteency. many folks i'd buy this approach as honest, from std, no.
VOTE: STD
#hereisurthunder.
In post 158, Save The Dragons wrote:lets go ircher wagon
In post 198, Save The Dragons wrote:more votes on ircher plz
In post 553, Save The Dragons wrote:though i disagree i think ircher is scum
In post 1161, Save The Dragons wrote:MUSH do you have an opinion on Arcade