he was convinced im scum day 2 -__- just iso him, the latter part of his day 2 posts are focused on me for the most part
he jailed me bc he thought im scum
In post 4867, Transcend wrote:anyways since i looked shady as f-ck and i'm out of actions i'm going to go ahead and roleclaim 2-shot motion detector
N1 I chose Varsoon because I had no idea about him and someone visited him
N2 I chose Dunn because I wanted to see if anyone visited him, I didn't expect him to actually visit then
I got him visiting someone.
So uh there's that.
Posted: Sat Jul 16, 2016 9:59 pm
by Almost50
In post 4833, Dunnstral wrote:A50 you need to announce who you've targeted; no use hiding this info
Why would I be hiding anything?? I do have other games to read though and I have a Facebook account to check. I posted the last time I checked here and when I came back I was 4 pages behind already!!
In post 4833, Dunnstral wrote:A50 you need to announce who you've targeted; no use hiding this info
Why would I be hiding anything?? I do have other games to read though and I have a Facebook account to check. I posted the last time I checked here and when I came back I was 4 pages behind already!!
I just needed to know if you roleblocked me. (or mirhawk)
Posted: Sat Jul 16, 2016 10:02 pm
by Almost50
In post 4834, Boem_u_dusi wrote:If Dunnstral is town (very likely), Wake's yesterday lynchpool consisted of 3 town players (Titus, Dunnstral and me).
I'll have to ISO Airick10 before too long.
Currently I'm thinking:
POE: { Mirhawk, Wake }
Possibilities: { Airick10 }
Brace yourselves, lolcats are coming.
How about stoned-boy (aka beeboy)?
Disclaimer: Nothing personal, B. It's just a reference to your scummy behaviour, mate.
Yes. Actually, Mafia + SK + Town Vig + An Allien (this one I did see with my own eyes) all targeted Lapsa. OH, and possibly Werewolves did too!
Posted: Sat Jul 16, 2016 10:05 pm
by Transcend
i was testing to see if you'd claim having motion, if you were scum you'd likely keep your 1SV claim. i think you're conf town for changing it to 2SV.
Posted: Sat Jul 16, 2016 10:06 pm
by Boem_u_dusi
Transcend, what results you received exactly?
From mafiascum wiki: The Motion Detector learns if any actions were performed by or on a player, but not what they were, or who else was involved.
Posted: Sat Jul 16, 2016 10:07 pm
by Dunnstral
In post 4886, Transcend wrote:well you performed an action or visited someone. and scum vig isn't a thing. so when you changed your claim from 1SV to 2SV that made you conf town.
In post 4888, Transcend wrote:i was testing to see if you'd claim having motion, if you were scum you'd likely keep your 1SV claim. i think you're conf town for changing it to 2SV.
You little slipper that doesn't even make sense
Posted: Sat Jul 16, 2016 10:07 pm
by Dunnstral
good job boem
Posted: Sat Jul 16, 2016 10:09 pm
by Transcend
md is also able to be used by both alignments. so even if i'm scum, i'm scum motion detector since i did in fact confirm that dunn visited someone when he was perceived out of actions. you're overanalyzing the shit out of this.
In post 4886, Transcend wrote:well you performed an action or visited someone. and scum vig isn't a thing. so when you changed your claim from 1SV to 2SV that made you conf town.
In post 4888, Transcend wrote:i was testing to see if you'd claim having motion, if you were scum you'd likely keep your 1SV claim. i think you're conf town for changing it to 2SV.
I would rather not discuss my complicated process of elimination. Suffice it to say we had some claims that were either BSing or aren't worth protecting. Then there's also the "uncertainty" factor. You know, when you're not sure if this person was a Town PR or scum??
Posted: Sat Jul 16, 2016 10:10 pm
by Dunnstral
No you didn't, because I could have still been visited by like 5 other prs, or scum roleblocker
Yet you somehow assumed that I visited someone. Doesn't make sense