Mafiascum.net

also did ndmath eveer answer my questions let me check

nope they did not

@blood i will keep "antispewing" until someone hammers me. I don't care.
ask me whatever u want.

i will answer honestly and with depth.

if im indeed scum i am digging my own grave, but i am town here and have no fear in being open with my reads

@everyone who is voting me: consider this: are you voting me because you are assuming i am scum and then working backwards to find that solution? or did you actually find something i said scummy?

if its the t3 thing, why is my explaination not sufficient? is it not genuine?

if its something else, why?

as for the STD thing i cant really explain why i shifted my read there - sorry.

i would if i could.

[vasex, ndmath, anastasia] may contain all scum i believe. if not, then the extension of [nero] should be enough. i honestly cannot see anyone else being scum here. obviously make sure to reconsider in Elo if there's any inconsistencies in who has died and who is alive.

if i put my tinfoil hat on hard enough i can maybe see Mark too but that would be like a really far out read.

In post 4865, WindowsXP wrote:

In post 4863, DrippingGoofball wrote:XP's claim refusal tantrum is scum.

how?

Read my sig.

In post 4868, WindowsXP wrote:im not claiming out of spite yeah, but it isnt alignment indicative

It absolutely is alignment-indicative.

In post 4874, WindowsXP wrote:like i legit give my very honest reasoning as to why i thought t3 was legit and somehow im magically scum from that?

get real.

In conjunction with your early comments about there being a traitor.

If it wasn't you sending out feelers about traitors, then who was it?

i have the shittiest role imaginable

In post 4883, DrippingGoofball wrote:

In post 4868, WindowsXP wrote:im not claiming out of spite yeah, but it isnt alignment indicative

It absolutely is alignment-indicative.

judging people's alignments based on a claim is folly. if im scum i can think of a fakeclaim easily. i just did so in a mini normal very quickly when replacing into a slot that was near doomed. my intentions there were to abuse the fact taht people on this site assume pr claim = clear and stay alive.

if people actually want to evaluate my dayplay i'll claim but im gonna otherwise just use this as a lesson to stop thinking a claim is the only way out of a shitpush.

In post 4884, DrippingGoofball wrote:

In post 4874, WindowsXP wrote:like i legit give my very honest reasoning as to why i thought t3 was legit and somehow im magically scum from that?

get real.

In conjunction with your early comments about there being a traitor.

If it wasn't you sending out feelers about traitors, then who was it?

so you think - i told t3 in scum chat to claim 1 shot bp and then get him wagoned for it?

im amazed at how stupid you think i am

if i cared about surviving i would have claimed ages ago - you should be seeing this as more town indicative because my scum instinct is to placate and pull wool over the eyes as much as possible.

also lowkey i want to try to bait scum to potentially target me for a nightkill still so perhaps thats why i am so ambiguous because i know i can eventually reach the right conclusions and make my push for a good PoE become a threat

In post 4887, WindowsXP wrote:

In post 4884, DrippingGoofball wrote:

In post 4874, WindowsXP wrote:like i legit give my very honest reasoning as to why i thought t3 was legit and somehow im magically scum from that?

get real.

In conjunction with your early comments about there being a traitor.

If it wasn't you sending out feelers about traitors, then who was it?

so you think - i told t3 in scum chat to claim 1 shot bp and then get him wagoned for it?

No, I literally said that T3 made this claim without his team's approval.

In post 4891, DrippingGoofball wrote:

In post 4887, WindowsXP wrote:

In post 4884, DrippingGoofball wrote:

In post 4874, WindowsXP wrote:like i legit give my very honest reasoning as to why i thought t3 was legit and somehow im magically scum from that?

get real.

In conjunction with your early comments about there being a traitor.

If it wasn't you sending out feelers about traitors, then who was it?

so you think - i told t3 in scum chat to claim 1 shot bp and then get him wagoned for it?

No, I literally said that T3 made this claim without his team's approval.

and u think i was like "hey lets bring attention to it and make it look scummy!"

u know what let me see if dunns spews me town. i want to believe that dunns spewed me town.

UNVOTE: XP,

Please read the game from the beginning and give me your theory about how the scum and the traitor were sending each other smoke signals and feelers.

I am unvoting to give you the time.

In post 638, T3 wrote:Dunn vs STD giving me tvt vibes.

In post 639, Dunnstral wrote:

In post 638, T3 wrote:Dunn vs STD giving me tvt vibes.

Based on what?

I wouldn't say this atm

wait

did they already know ? lol

In post 4894, DrippingGoofball wrote:UNVOTE: XP,

Please read the game from the beginning and give me your theory about how the scum and the traitor were sending each other smoke signals and feelers.

I am unvoting to give you the time.

i mean like there is an obvious path which is nero being scum neighbor with traitor and they knew from the start - but i townlean nero's dayplay atm.

In post 4863, DrippingGoofball wrote:XP's claim refusal tantrum is scum.

+1

idrc if you are town or not

you should know we can't keep you no matter what if you don't claim