Posted: Tue Jul 12, 2022 4:55 pm
Mine
Yeah, you're wrong, you don't need to use a wiki for this.In post 4874, Lukewarm wrote:Feel free to let me know if you think that that means I got it wrong.
Hello, you want to help scumhunt?In post 4871, JohnnyFarrar wrote:Hi Frog
Well if it's not related to flavor, it can only be related to my role.In post 4880, Lukewarm wrote:So, gonna say that we failed to communicate lmao
Sure, but tell me what you think about dunnstral real quick? You stopped posting right when I asked youIn post 4881, Frogsterking wrote:Hello, you want to help scumhunt?In post 4871, JohnnyFarrar wrote:Hi Frog
Don't worry, I was being pretty cryptic. But at the same time already feel like other people can figure it out.In post 4883, Lukewarm wrote:I don't like this game.
I think Dunn is obvtownIn post 4884, JohnnyFarrar wrote:Sure, but tell me what you think about dunnstral real quick? You stopped posting right when I asked youIn post 4881, Frogsterking wrote:Hello, you want to help scumhunt?In post 4871, JohnnyFarrar wrote:Hi Frog
In post 4867, Frogsterking wrote:Now that it's calmed down a little, can we (CSF + anyone else who wants to be helpful) meta dive Malcolm? I have a hypothesis that Malcolm is more likely to get baited into 1v1 on D1 when Town than they have done thus far in this game. I recall town!Malcolm getting involved in a lengthy 1v1 with luminous in the completed Large Normal I rolled scum in.
I could use help collecting data points on this idea, and I think it's worth pursuing because it's easily proven wrong and Malcolm is a viable lim today.
This kind of feels like a lazy vote, because just by opening Dunn's ISO, it's clear he had already explained his reasoning a lot by this point. It's not really directly engaging with any of his points imoIn post 4493, Taly wrote:VOTE: DunnstralIn post 4020, Dunnstral wrote:I think that a second mason should step forward or Roden should die. I am willing to discuss this before leaping to action.
Explain
I don't know what post you are looking at. All I can say to this is that I'm not referring to flavor, so if there is a way to interpret both a role and flavor, go for the role.In post 4887, Lukewarm wrote:Do you think that I looked at the right post, but just interpreted wrong?
Or, if the most obvious thing from the post would have been a flavor reference, do you think I was completely on the wrong trail?
Also, I take this back.In post 4883, Lukewarm wrote:I don't like this game.
I agree. I also did not like Bellaphant's reaction, and have noted that they still don't have reasoning for having scumread me before this point.In post 4889, Cat Scratch Fever wrote:This kind of feels like a lazy vote, because just by opening Dunn's ISO, it's clear he had already explained his reasoning a lot by this point. It's not really directly engaging with any of his points imoIn post 4493, Taly wrote:VOTE: DunnstralIn post 4020, Dunnstral wrote:I think that a second mason should step forward or Roden should die. I am willing to discuss this before leaping to action.
Explain
Is this antispewIn post 4892, Dunnstral wrote:I agree. I also did not like Bellaphant's reaction, and have noted that they still don't have reasoning for having scumread me before this point.In post 4889, Cat Scratch Fever wrote:This kind of feels like a lazy vote, because just by opening Dunn's ISO, it's clear he had already explained his reasoning a lot by this point. It's not really directly engaging with any of his points imoIn post 4493, Taly wrote:VOTE: DunnstralIn post 4020, Dunnstral wrote:I think that a second mason should step forward or Roden should die. I am willing to discuss this before leaping to action.
Explain
I feel like I had explained myself numerous times at this point, and that Taly wasn't looking into it at all.In post 4765, Taly wrote:easier to read as time goes on in my experience, plus its one way to just limit the collective pool since finding cohesion seems incredibly difficult right now.Dunnstral wrote:Why? Being in a neighborhood does not make you less likely to be mafia. And there are a lot of people in neighborhoods.In post 4748, Taly wrote:hesitant to lim anyone in a claimed hood rn
im also still pretty lost why you wanted mason claims.
I don't think it is. I think CSF is revisiting the thread which was moving pretty fast for reactions and found something of concern.In post 4893, Bell wrote:Is this antispewIn post 4892, Dunnstral wrote:I agree. I also did not like Bellaphant's reaction, and have noted that they still don't have reasoning for having scumread me before this point.In post 4889, Cat Scratch Fever wrote:This kind of feels like a lazy vote, because just by opening Dunn's ISO, it's clear he had already explained his reasoning a lot by this point. It's not really directly engaging with any of his points imoIn post 4493, Taly wrote:VOTE: DunnstralIn post 4020, Dunnstral wrote:I think that a second mason should step forward or Roden should die. I am willing to discuss this before leaping to action.
Explain
I've been reading Dunn as town for a long time so, no.In post 4817, JohnnyFarrar wrote:Pooks and TBone, you cool with a Dunn launch? If not, why not?
I guess I'm checking to see if Malcolm has a divergent scum and town meta first then so I don't waste my time.In post 4888, Cat Scratch Fever wrote:In post 4867, Frogsterking wrote:Now that it's calmed down a little, can we (CSF + anyone else who wants to be helpful) meta dive Malcolm? I have a hypothesis that Malcolm is more likely to get baited into 1v1 on D1 when Town than they have done thus far in this game. I recall town!Malcolm getting involved in a lengthy 1v1 with luminous in the completed Large Normal I rolled scum in.
I could use help collecting data points on this idea, and I think it's worth pursuing because it's easily proven wrong and Malcolm is a viable lim today.
unless Malcolm has a very divergent town and scum meta, I'm probably not going to do a metadive day 1 in a large, especially when I still have to read all of this game
I only did yours bc I remembered your scumgame was v different from your towngame and wanted to read updated meta to make sure that was still the case
Confirmable: yesIn post 4873, Bell wrote:Is it a role that is confirmable or extremely useful and you would not recommend killing in any capacity D1 Dunn.