Page 199 of 323
Posted: Sat May 18, 2019 7:16 pm
by NanceFloor
In post 4864, RadiantCowbells wrote:Scums entire game plan today
Has been to prevent me winning with coalition tomorrow
And I think that is or should be really obvious
If pb Moongrass believed the shit they were spewing they would trade for.me. putting me in these vetos is meaningless it they're town who thinks I'm scum because I'll just not die. Forcing this situation where I have to be answerable for a double.misread is how you beat me as scum
Where was that one post that was essentially a scumclaim
That’s why I sr him for that Maria veto because he was trying to eliminate a viable coalition member.
Posted: Sat May 18, 2019 7:18 pm
by NanceFloor
In post 4865, Skygazer wrote: In post 4862, Titus wrote:
A town where you and I have zero influence on the coalition and you think that's mostly town?
Not a chance that was town driven.
just because it was scum driven doesn't mean it was necessarily driven by the scum that were on the coalition
see: moongrass/chennis
I don’t think they can both be scum because I don’t think they would bus at this stage, plus I don’t think Chenn is scum. I know Ank did but I’m still not sure why.
Posted: Sat May 18, 2019 7:22 pm
by NanceFloor
In post 4869, RadiantCowbells wrote: In post 4782, Moongrass wrote:D3 he tries to control the coalition, then takes no part in forming it because he wants to use our repicker to create his own coalition...which he still hasn't shared btw...so he whined, then tried to waste our repick after coalition was an obvious fail.
He's trying to imply that I caused the first coalition to fail to discredit my coalition then says that giving me the coalition is 'wasting' it
When I flip town it should be really obvious that the last thing scum would have wanted is to let me coalition and potentially just have an unanswerable wincon for town
Btw the two people who took the lead on taking potshots against me? PB Moongrass. The same two slots that ragequit at about the same time when I was going to lead a coalition without either of them in it. Ank even tried to stop the coalition while she was around by pushing some dumbass 'but it won't give me personally any information!' crao
Ank tr both of us and we’re suffering because she replaced out over WOAT PB. Sorry PB but you are being a bad gamethrowing WOAT here and you should feel really fucking bad about that.
Posted: Sat May 18, 2019 7:24 pm
by NanceFloor
In post 4875, Pink Ball wrote: In post 4869, RadiantCowbells wrote: In post 4782, Moongrass wrote:D3 he tries to control the coalition, then takes no part in forming it because he wants to use our repicker to create his own coalition...which he still hasn't shared btw...so he whined, then tried to waste our repick after coalition was an obvious fail.
He's trying to imply that I caused the first coalition to fail to discredit my coalition then says that giving me the coalition is 'wasting' it
When I flip town it should be really obvious that the last thing scum would have wanted is to let me coalition and potentially just have an unanswerable wincon for town
Btw the two people who took the lead on taking potshots against me? PB Moongrass. The same two slots that ragequit at about the same time when I was going to lead a coalition without either of them in it. Ank even tried to stop the coalition while she was around by pushing some dumbass 'but it won't give me personally any information!' crao
I really don't know why you keep dragging me into this lol. I don't even fully understand what the plan about coalitions and whatsoever is.
I'm scumreading NanceFloor, and if they flip scum, which they will, you're probably their partner for what I've read. Old fashioned mafia, babyeee
PB, please stop being a bad fucking gamethrowing WOAT, ktankx.
Posted: Sat May 18, 2019 7:25 pm
by NanceFloor
In post 4876, NanceFloor wrote:
oh boy I don't know if I'm gonna be able to stop Nancy death-tunneling you after that idiotic statement
You don’t deserve kindness for trying to mislynch us. Dann was being too kind.
Posted: Sat May 18, 2019 7:27 pm
by NanceFloor
Disgust is the word that comes to my mind and oh yeah, contempt.
Posted: Sat May 18, 2019 7:31 pm
by NanceFloor
In post 4881, Pink Ball wrote:
I understand. But it's not very intelligent to death-tunnel me instead of work with me I think. I mean, you've already stated I'm obvtown because of my entrance AND because of my predecessor. So scumreading me now that you know I'm scumreading you is not a good idea in the slight chance we're both town here.
Work with you? Are you high or something? You’re trying to fucking mislynch us.
Posted: Sat May 18, 2019 7:32 pm
by Pink Ball
VOTE: Clemency, Chemist, Creature, Pink Ball
Whatever. We're all four in the previous coalition and I replaced way too late to be useful. Especially if Nancy starts treating me like shit only because I think she's scum. It's a fucking game, have some fucking respect.
Bye.
Posted: Sat May 18, 2019 7:34 pm
by NanceFloor
In post 4882, NanceFloor wrote: In post 4879, Titus wrote: In post 4876, NanceFloor wrote:
oh boy I don't know if I'm gonna be able to stop Nancy death-tunneling you after that idiotic statement
You can always sheep my veto.
There's a chance scum resolve it.
sure
VOTE: Creature Clemency Chemist Pink Ball
I still think my original veto was optimal but now I no longer gaf about this game. :/
Posted: Sat May 18, 2019 7:36 pm
by NanceFloor
In post 4884, NanceFloor wrote: In post 4881, Pink Ball wrote:So scumreading me now that you know I'm scumreading you is not a good idea in the slight chance we're both town here.
And I believe you know this is very much not how Nancy works
There is 0 chance we’re not town here. Tell me PB, how I am being even remotely scummy here?
Posted: Sat May 18, 2019 7:37 pm
by NanceFloor
In post 4886, Pink Ball wrote: In post 4883, NanceFloor wrote: In post 4881, Pink Ball wrote:I understand. But it's not very intelligent to death-tunnel me instead of work with me I think. I mean, you've already stated I'm obvtown because of my entrance AND because of my predecessor. So scumreading me now that you know I'm scumreading you is not a good idea in the slight chance we're both town here.
I'm Dann
My reads are not Nancy's
Oh I thought Nancy was talking in third person and it was hilarious. This makes more sense.
What have you been doing Danny boy?
p-edit: I know how Nancy works towards other players, not with me. I'm a very good Nancy reader and she knows it.
Bull fucking shit, not if your reads are this terrible as they are in THIS game.
Posted: Sat May 18, 2019 7:39 pm
by NanceFloor
In post 4885, Creature wrote:I really would prefer if we wouldn't give scum the chance to kill obvtown.
I don’t know wtf PB is but he is 100% scumsiding. How does it feel to be scum MVP PB? You had better embrace that title.
Posted: Sat May 18, 2019 7:40 pm
by NanceFloor
In post 4961, NanceFloor wrote: In post 4885, Creature wrote:I really would prefer if we wouldn't give scum the chance to kill obvtown.
I don’t know wtf PB is but he is 100% scumsiding. How does it feel to be scum MVP PB? PB had better embrace that title.
Posted: Sat May 18, 2019 7:40 pm
by Pink Ball
Fuck off
Posted: Sat May 18, 2019 7:42 pm
by NanceFloor
In post 4889, Creature wrote:
idk for sure, but Chem and Clem are like the only coalition players I feel like are worth losing at veto.
I still think PB is scumsiding town, so scum probably won’t kill him. Why would they when they can get him to lose the game for town?
Posted: Sat May 18, 2019 7:44 pm
by NanceFloor
In post 4892, Pink Ball wrote:Just to be clear, and I think it will probably be the last time I address this: do you really think I replace into a game with 180 pages into a slot that apparently wasn't in danger, claim I'm not going to read it, scumread both a slot with Nancy Drew 39 and RadiantCowbells and think I can get away with it as scum?
C'mon, you're either giving me way too much credit, or you're pushing some kind of agenda. RC falls in the second category, for example.
Look, I'm going to impersonate Chandler Bing and say, "could I BE any more bad gamethrowing town?"
FIFY You’re welcome.
Posted: Sat May 18, 2019 7:45 pm
by Titus
This conversation doesn't help. Just vote the veto, do the coalition tomorrow and move on please.
Posted: Sat May 18, 2019 7:45 pm
by NanceFloor
I had the most optimal possibility protown veto before and gamethrowing idiots have made me completely ceased to care.
Posted: Sat May 18, 2019 7:46 pm
by Moongrass
PB don't bend. Who do you scumread besides those who must not be acknowledged?
Titus what's the two PoE pools if your second coalition faila?
Posted: Sat May 18, 2019 7:46 pm
by Pink Ball
In post 4966, Titus wrote:This conversation doesn't help. Just vote the veto, do the coalition tomorrow and move on please.
I'm not having a conversation. This is a monologue.
Posted: Sat May 18, 2019 7:47 pm
by NanceFloor
Trust me, you really don’t want to know what Dann is thinking about you rn, he is too much of a gentleman to tell you.
Posted: Sat May 18, 2019 7:47 pm
by Pink Ball
In post 4968, Moongrass wrote:PB don't bend. Who do you scumread besides those who must not be acknowledged?
Titus what's the two PoE pools if your second coalition faila?
I'm sorry, it's not about bending, it's about lines being crossed.
Posted: Sat May 18, 2019 7:48 pm
by Moongrass
Yes I get it, I'm pissed off too but that's the tactic. Demoralize town until they can't be fucked doing anything anymore.
Posted: Sat May 18, 2019 7:50 pm
by NanceFloor
In post 4908, Moongrass wrote:VOTE: RC, NF, PB, Moon
Sorry PB, RC is right, the tradeoff is worth it.
I would use the repick to 1/4 twice. Use confirm to check controversial slots remaining. Use quiz when town is on the right track, if we ever get there.
Anybody who thinks Coalition is ever going to win this game is delusional.
Right because you’re either going to kill both me and RC or set one of us up, like he said.
VOTE: Chemist, Clemency, Moongrass, PB
I still think PB is town but since he’s good with mislynching us, I no longer give a fuck.
Posted: Sat May 18, 2019 7:51 pm
by Moongrass
PB talk to me about Chen town and what's your read on TD?