Mafiascum.net

Hell yeah I totally hunted those Masons out

lmfao

My only 2 scumreads were both of the Masons

I'm going to go lie down

Professional Mason Hunter

anyway I changed the 2 mason columns to green for everyone

@me if you want to scumread them or w/e

I'm counting 14 mafia reads on BlueBloodedToffee, 10 null reads, and 1 town read. And the 1 person townreading them has way too many town reads for them to all be accurate

So is this outdated, or is there otherwise a compelling reason as to why we are not eliminating there?

RCE -> Town
Klick -> Town
Bell -> Null
Johnny -> Null
Taly -> Null
BestBird -> Null

9 null reads, actually

In post 4955, Dunnstral wrote:I'm counting 14 mafia reads on BlueBloodedToffee, 10 null reads, and 1 town read. And the 1 person townreading them has way too many town reads for them to all be accurate

So is this outdated, or is there otherwise a compelling reason as to why we are not eliminating there?

That's because both of my scumreads ended up being masons and those 2 red columns became green

Frogster would've nailed those scum if they weren't secretly masons

Both of our heads TR Math so that should probably be updated on the spreadsheet

~GE

In post 4508, T-Bone wrote:The resistance to the claim continues to ping me as odd. We have no known way mechanically to either tie the players together or confirm them post mortem. So like...???

Masons are barely a town utility role anyway who cares?

Catching up. Agree with this. Not sure why the resistance went on so long. It strikes me as unlikely Dwlee/Roden lying here, happy to move on.

@Pooky

In post 4956, Frogsterking wrote:RCE -> Town
Klick -> Town
Bell -> Null
Johnny -> Null
Taly -> Null
BestBird -> Null

In post 4546, Dunnstral wrote:So Roden. Did you have a super special crumb that Dwlee could have referenced after you died, like multiple players have suggested; or was there nothing like that?

Because if there was nothing like that then your partner claiming here was absolutely necessary. I would not have personally believed Dwlee if they had claimed after you had died.

Agree with this, and still not seeing Dunn scum.

@all

I think this makes sense, looking at my null reads

VOTE: Enchant

In post 4920, Frogsterking wrote:

In post 4806, T-Bone wrote:Okay lads, we can stop trotting out Ceph, Dunn, Johnny, and Math votes, they are all town sorry to say. Please be original.

Challenge accepted

Enchant

In post 4938, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:

In post 4936, Frogsterking wrote:Pooky what's BB at in the Readslist

I haven't updated since last night

what do people want to change?

22221112121212212313211112
-Guanine

In post 4732, JohnnyFarrar wrote:Big no on Dweelee, Roden.

Dunn feels like a shark out for blood right now.

Do we feel like he has an agenda? Is that why we're voting him?

Again I don't really see this. Dunn made the point that Roden could be lying. This was feasible, if perhaps unlikely, given the circumstances. Dwlee's mason claim gave us more info and allowed us to ascertain that both are probably being genuine. I think Luke's read on Dunn was fairly original even if I don't agree, I think there's notably a lot of people starting to circle that wagon without committing in my catch-up. It's like people potentially want to force out a strong townie who's had some good reads but feel like it could backfire on them further down the line.

In post 4964, Frogsterking wrote:@all

I think this makes sense, looking at my null reads

VOTE: Enchant

What's leading you in this direction? I find Enchant pretty impossible to read.

Can't say I'm liking a lot of Drapion's posts as I catch up. Would potentially entertain a vote there but would want to do a more detailed ISO check before committing.

In post 3935, Bellaphant wrote:

In post 3216, Bellaphant wrote:Rad
Cat
Frog
Luke
Klick
Dancing puppets


Scum

Galron
Dunn
Pp
Ceph
Bell


Null
Poorly
Enchant
Tbone
Mala
Oof the hook
Cytosine and Guanine
Malcolm
Math
Dweelee
Johnny
Rce
Bbt
Roden
Taly

Do I need to change the for ay?

@pooky

In post 4968, MalcolmTucker wrote:

In post 4964, Frogsterking wrote:@all

I think this makes sense, looking at my null reads

VOTE: Enchant

What's leading you in this direction? I find Enchant pretty impossible to read.

Because I have a million townreads and Enchant is null, and Dunn is my only townread towncasing Enchant, whereas other slots have stronger support. I feel like I normally feel better about Enchant by now as well, they seem pretty low energy in this game.

In post 4867, Frogsterking wrote:Now that it's calmed down a little, can we (CSF + anyone else who wants to be helpful) meta dive Malcolm?

I have a hypothesis that Malcolm is more likely to get baited into 1v1 on D1 when Town than they have done thus far in this game.

I recall town!Malcolm getting involved in a lengthy 1v1 with luminous in the completed Large Normal I rolled scum in.

I could use help collecting data points on this idea, and I think it's worth pursuing because it's easily proven wrong and Malcolm is a viable lim today.

Honestly, one of the primary reasons I've not probably gotten into a lengthy 1v1 is because I'm generally asleep when there are dozens of pages of content being produced. That's not necessarily meant as a complaint - just to point out that a lot of my posts are largely having to be catch-ups as I see what's being happening with the game from the night before. I don't think I'm necessarily a hugely confrontational player but I'm not inherently opposed to conflict here either, I'm just often offline when the game is at its most active.

In post 4889, Cat Scratch Fever wrote:

In post 4493, Taly wrote:

In post 4020, Dunnstral wrote:I think that a second mason should step forward or Roden should die. I am willing to discuss this before leaping to action.

VOTE: Dunnstral

Explain

This kind of feels like a lazy vote, because just by opening Dunn's ISO, it's clear he had already explained his reasoning a lot by this point. It's not really directly engaging with any of his points imo

Agreed, I disagree with the thrust of Luke's main argument but think it's coming from town - I think a lot of the votes since then have been opportunistic. I've generally found Taly more townie than not so far but don't like that vote at all.

In post 4972, MalcolmTucker wrote:

In post 4867, Frogsterking wrote:Now that it's calmed down a little, can we (CSF + anyone else who wants to be helpful) meta dive Malcolm?

I have a hypothesis that Malcolm is more likely to get baited into 1v1 on D1 when Town than they have done thus far in this game.

I recall town!Malcolm getting involved in a lengthy 1v1 with luminous in the completed Large Normal I rolled scum in.

I could use help collecting data points on this idea, and I think it's worth pursuing because it's easily proven wrong and Malcolm is a viable lim today.

Honestly, one of the primary reasons I've not probably gotten into a lengthy 1v1 is because I'm generally asleep when there are dozens of pages of content being produced. That's not necessarily meant as a complaint - just to point out that a lot of my posts are largely having to be catch-ups as I see what's being happening with the game from the night before. I don't think I'm necessarily a hugely confrontational player but I'm not inherently opposed to conflict here either, I'm just often offline when the game is at its most active.

I think this looks like a scum excuse on paper and in the big picture I feel like you're probably telling the truth.