Mafiascum.net

Titus is V/La til wednesday.

Gotta go get my finger prints done.

No, too scummy to be scum and weird are absolutely not the same things at all.
Weirdness is something you question and ask about.
Scumminess is pretty much whatever scum do that town don't with whatever

ugh
gotta go.

Can't omplete sentence bbl.

hmmmm... okay, not sure i really follow you but when you'll be back i'd like to know how an excess of questioning stuff is towny

It's not.
I'm saying that weirdness is the beginning of questions and the answers to those questions determine whether (well and the result, plus reality etc) it was scummy or not.

In post 4977, Bell wrote:It's not.
I'm saying that weirdness is the beginning of questions and the answers to those questions determine whether (well and the result, plus reality etc) it was scummy or not.

too questionable to be scum then?

anyways, your point relies on the fact that titus has a lot of weirdness, not really likling this

What are your reads and why Gyphx?

In post 4978, Gypyx wrote:

In post 4977, Bell wrote:It's not.
I'm saying that weirdness is the beginning of questions and the answers to those questions determine whether (well and the result, plus reality etc) it was scummy or not.

too questionable to be scum then?

anyways, your point relies on the fact that titus has a lot of weirdness, not really likling this

Nope, you're putting words in my mouth.

In post 4980, Bell wrote:

In post 4978, Gypyx wrote:

In post 4977, Bell wrote:It's not.
I'm saying that weirdness is the beginning of questions and the answers to those questions determine whether (well and the result, plus reality etc) it was scummy or not.

too questionable to be scum then?

anyways, your point relies on the fact that titus has a lot of weirdness, not really likling this

Nope, you're putting words in my mouth.

am i misremembering?

No, you aren't.
I'm stating there are questions to be asked.

You don't yeet weird, you question it and then you yeet it if it comes back red.

The mena point is simply that Mena told me and then I don't think he ever got around to sourcing it, that town win more when the days are shorter or when there are less dead line crunch eliminations town tend to win more.

Case in point me,
who was weird.
But not scum.

Also, get on FF's level Cabd.
You're falling behind.

In post 4982, Bell wrote:No, you aren't.
I'm stating there are questions to be asked.

You don't yeet weird, you question it and then you yeet it if it comes back red.

ah okay, not sure i agree with saying weirdness is NAI but that makes sense

and can confirm mena's theory, just lost a game to deadline crunch lol

In post 4986, Gypyx wrote:just lost a game to deadline crunch lol

The closer you play to a deadline the harder it gets to eliminate scum because you're not only relying on other town to actually be available to show up to vote or scum to help bus instead of abusing the deadline to not be helpful.

In post 4973, Bell wrote:Weird does not equal scum, I want to see if she has good explanations for each weirdness presented.

I don't really understand how complete mischaracterization of my play is considered weird and not scummy.

In post 4988, Brian Skies wrote:

In post 4973, Bell wrote:Weird does not equal scum, I want to see if she has good explanations for each weirdness presented.

I don't really understand how complete mischaracterization of my play is considered weird and not scummy.

Yes, I was absolutely talking about mischaracterization of your play specifically and not the lover claim and move and vote and push and positioning on me and whether this is dense Titus rfwr or wftrr or rftrr.

I am also aware that Titus's posting was kinda cheesy in re defense of me.

But LLD is cheesy and has been town too, so I'm like.
They must know the cheese is in the bread right?

I don't know what any of those acronyms mean.

Bell, who do you think is scum?

right for the wrong reasons. wrong for the right reasons, wrong for the right reasons and wrong for the wrong reasons.

I guess are all the permutations I can think of.
In summary,
I'm waffling.

Well, her reasons have already been proven to be bullshit, so you can go ahead and cross those off.

In post 4992, Brian Skies wrote:Bell, who do you think is scum?

Rn?
Gyphx, because he's being chill and all and I appreciate the defense.
But beyond that I see somebody intentionally hiding their trajectories and I'd like to find out more.

In post 4994, Brian Skies wrote:Well, her reasons have already been proven to be bullshit, so you can go ahead and cross those off.

How many games have you played where somebody falsely accused you of something and then they flipped town anyway.

you mind if i just put link to previous posts as explainations bell?

A reminder that a bunch of people just called my real doctor claim fake and voted me.
They can't all be scum.

But each of them mischaracterized by town play as scum play
or mechanically reasoned incorrectly.

You can see where I'm coming from here?
Just consider me jaded.