Yep.zwetschenwasser wrote:And molestargazer, your name could be rearranged into molester...
Anyone fancy leaving with me tonight?
Although a bit late, a Happy Valentinesday to all of you.Max wrote:"At table 1 we have BSG. She is a rock hard feminist and hates it when a guy sees himself as better than a girl. Her greatest love are penguins, but perhaps you can change this. The good part is that she does never anything wrong as she is controlled by a penguin. So you might say nice things about penguins, or your love story might end very soon. But all in all, she's a great girl to spend your time with.
I think the penguin that controls you might've glitched.BSG wrote:So first of, what confuses you about the wincon Zwet?
And I just love ( ), Molestar's defence of Zwet in post 47. Add that you are trying to play both sides of Zwet - Caboose and that you point something out which has no meaning yet, deserves you aVote Molestargazer
I read it again. Still says the same thing.Caboose wrote:I thinkKmd4390 wrote:I think you need to read the win condition again.Molest wrote: knowing that they will lose if they are lynched but wanting to help the town anyway.youneed to read the win condition again.
FoS: Kmd
Are you getting this from your role PM?Caboose wrote:Then you should know that if a townie leaves with a scum, then the townie will lose.
Exactly.Kmd4390 wrote:Are you getting this from your role PM?Caboose wrote:Then you should know that if a townie leaves with a scum, then the townie will lose.
Unvote, Vote Caboose
In the OP, it says don't leave with married people.
Hint: I don't see that in my Role PM.
Asking Mod via PM if my paraphrasing of it is ok.
I win when all of the scum are out.Kmd4390 wrote: Asking Mod via PM if my paraphrasing of it is ok.
Exactly? You are saying that town loses by leaving with scum. I do NOT see that in my Role PM at all.Caboose wrote:Exactly.Kmd4390 wrote:Are you getting this from your role PM?Caboose wrote:Then you should know that if a townie leaves with a scum, then the townie will lose.
Unvote, Vote Caboose
In the OP, it says don't leave with married people.
Hint: I don't see that in my Role PM.
Asking Mod via PM if my paraphrasing of it is ok.
What's with the vote?
Well, then, you either didn't get a town role PM or mole and I have some kind of survivor aspect to our roles, I'm inclined to believe it's the former.Kmd4390 wrote:I win when all of the scum are out.Kmd4390 wrote: Asking Mod via PM if my paraphrasing of it is ok.
Exactly? You are saying that town loses by leaving with scum. I do NOT see that in my Role PM at all.Caboose wrote:Exactly.Kmd4390 wrote:Are you getting this from your role PM?Caboose wrote:Then you should know that if a townie leaves with a scum, then the townie will lose.
Unvote, Vote Caboose
In the OP, it says don't leave with married people.
Hint: I don't see that in my Role PM.
Asking Mod via PM if my paraphrasing of it is ok.
What's with the vote?
You gave him a way out. By saying who the scum are and by saying that you were confused as well, before Zwet could respond to Caboose ('Eh???' does not count). It's allowed to defence, but do so after said player has responded, besides 'Eh???'. Besides, the mod has said that there could be more parties in this game, so the defence of yours doesn't have to be the case.Molestargazer wrote:Also, surely if he was scum, he'd understand that the scum are the married people 'cos he's one of them?
I understand your point - and indeed I'll be learning from this and allowing people to present their own defence before I butt in in future - but I was simply pointing out a potential flaw in the attacking argument.BSG wrote:You gave him a way out. By saying who the scum are and by saying that you were confused as well, before Zwet could respond to Caboose ('Eh???' does not count). It's allowed to defence, but do so after said player has responded, besides 'Eh???'. Besides, the mod has said that there could be more parties in this game, so the defence of yours doesn't have to be the case.
I try not to play fiercely. I don't condemn / attack people unnecessarily. I'll state a problem, and allow them to respond.BSG wrote:Playing both sides:
It is the tone when I read it that bothers me. You don't think it's a scum tell. If this is true, I would expect a fierce tone, but I don't get that from that part. You just state your opinion, and you give the attacker a golden star as he's having the first go at scumhunting...
Guilty.BSG wrote:Pointing out:
You've got my point. You point something out, and that's it. You point something out, which might not even be relevant.
There's no evidence I can give for this, but I can assure that that was not my intention when filling. I was just typing out what I saw, and thought might be worth a mention at the time.BSG wrote:This gives the impression that you actually do something, while actually doing nothing. And that's scummy. What you pointed out, is just filling.
Don't get this. Could you explain?Zwet wrote:I have negative clue.