Mafiascum.net

Benmage wrote:Whats point 5 there drip...?

Classic IIoA scumtell in post #27.

Drippereth wrote:Classic IIoA scumtell in post #27.

I agree!

He's not scum hunting, he's just painting people as scummy.

He plays like a jester or something.

So I'm not going to vote for him.

:p

Mina wrote:Hey, guys! I have an awesome idea. We should have a mass nameclaim today! That will totally catch all the scum, by...um, forcing them to use their fake claims. I mean, the one who suggested that plan in

A Game of Thrones

Mafia went on to win the game, so it will be a total success.

lol. Can I just say I'm as staunchly against the idea in this game as I was in that one? With 26 players I can't imagine the colossal waste of time it would take to discuss a name claim.

danakillsu wrote:Everybody raising themselves is stupid for trying to say others are scum. Not everyone can raise themselves, or nobody will get the double vote.

But not everyone is raising themselves... And, I don't see anyone that is raising himself/herself to try and say others are scum. They may be doing it to say "I'm not scum" but not the other way around.

Drippereth wrote:(5) being RichardGHP

What does this mean?

Otherwise, I'm on board with the Deer wagon.



xvart.

- policy lynch

wait, SSK's not in the game?

- for stalking me

wait, Fate's not in this game either?



for being the last o the list.

But not everyone is raising themselves... And, I don't see anyone that is raising himself/herself to try and say others are scum. They may be doing it to say "I'm not scum" but not the other way around.

Sigh. I'm not saying everyone is doing it. Try reading my post again assuming I'm not saying that. Also, try reading post 23, which FoS's everyone not raising themselves. Reading comprehension ftw. Because of this and the fact that he's already bandwagon voting.

vezopiraka wrote:

raise vezopiraka

Vote CryMeARiver

Oh random stage. You broke it

Yes, I broke it. Because Richard is genuinely scummy.

DanaShouldKillHerself wrote:Everybody raising themselves is stupid for trying to say others are scum. Not everyone can raise themselves, or nobody will get the double vote.

This post is what's really stupid actually.
I have a genuine scum read on Richard. I know for a fact that I am town. Why should I not vote him and not raise me?

Manga wrote:Standard questions - Any players with histories of bitter rivalry / hate? I'd like to know before we get too far into the game if there's a Ythan / McGriddle level of distaste I have to factor into my reads.

I highly dislike Dana's play. SSBF's is way too serious for me so I tend to get bad reads from him. Raven has a lurker meta = Dislike. I've never really liked Richard's play, especially as a claimed town PR.

DrModem wrote:<b>raise DrModem</b> (I'm selfish...)

<b>vote axelrod</b>

Nobody has voted for him yet :p

Obviously you didn't read the 2 pages of thread because I clearly stated RVS was over.

Benmage wrote:vote CryMeARiver

Raise Benmage
All should do this ^.

Hey, look, I already don't like you.

This makes me want to do a Fonz on you guys. So I will.
Please agree to the following contract or explain why you will not.
1) I will not claim VT unless I am at L1, I am the leading wagon with an impending deadline, or during a massclaim, or our claim can somehow shed light on someone elses (for example: someone claims to have tracked you going somewhere).
2) I will provide reasoning with each and every one of my votes.
3) I will not selfvote, barring the 2:1:1 endgame scenario.
4) I will not lie about my roles. Period.

Benmage wrote: Whats point 5 there drip...?

Benmage wrote:wait...none of those 5 things make sense..

Hey look Drip! I found more scum! Noob scum looking for an easy bandwagon!

ani wrote:vote: MafiaSSK - policy lynch

wait, SSK's not in the game?

unvote, vote: Fate - for stalking me

wait, Fate's not in this game either?

unvote, vote: Drippereth

for being the last o the list.

Again, pay attention, RVS = OVER

Dana wrote:Sigh. I'm not saying everyone is doing it. Try reading my post again assuming I'm not saying that. Also, try reading post 23, which FoS's everyone not raising themselves. Reading comprehension ftw. unvote vote: xvart Because of this and the fact that he's already bandwagon voting.

Bandwagoning /=/ Scummy

@Xvart, animorph - Why posting and not raising?

@Drip: It's hard to analyse stuff when there have only been RVS posts that will most likely not affect the game in any way.

@CMAR: I find it pretty hilarious that you have a "genuine scum read" on me when we're only on Page 3 and nothing has even happened yet. If you have actual reasons, I'd like to see them. Otherwise, stop trolling.

Also, I do not agree to the contract.

CryMeARiver wrote:

Benmage wrote:vote CryMeARiver

Raise Benmage
All should do this ^.

Hey, look, I already don't like you.

This makes me want to do a Fonz on you guys. So I will.
Please agree to the following contract or explain why you will not.
1) I will not claim VT unless I am at L1, I am the leading wagon with an impending deadline, or during a massclaim, or our claim can somehow shed light on someone elses (for example: someone claims to have tracked you going somewhere).
2) I will provide reasoning with each and every one of my votes.
3) I will not selfvote, barring the 2:1:1 endgame scenario.
4) I will not lie about my roles. Period.

Benmage wrote: Whats point 5 there drip...?

Benmage wrote:wait...none of those 5 things make sense..

Hey look Drip! I found more scum! Noob scum looking for an easy bandwagon!

Ahahaha...yes!

Alright boss, whats the point of the contract. Tell me a positive reason for it.

And those 5 points I thought were points against Deer, or why deer was scum which had no correlation to him, not that those 5 points would deem one scum (which in themselves i don't agree with) ... But oh puhlease go down the "i'm noob scum" road!!

RichardGHP wrote: Also, I do not agree to the contract.

I'm sorry...but i chuckled reading this .

Screw it



Trying to lead town out of RVS on PAGE 2, claiming he has a scumread on me when I haven't done anything wrong, and stating he knows "for a fact" that he is town. Oh, and the contract thing, too.

Seriously, what townie does all that?

Choo choo, i hate people who "declare the rvs over".

RichardGHP wrote:Screw it

##Unvote Vote CMAR

Trying to lead town out of RVS on PAGE 2, claiming he has a scumread on me when I haven't done anything wrong, and stating he knows "for a fact" that he is town. Oh, and the contract thing, too.

Seriously, what townie does all that?

I do.
The contract is meant because it supports town points CLEARLY.
Now, please, tell me why you disagree with it scum.
Yes, I have a good deal of reasons I find you scummy, hence why I lead town out of the RVS stage. Next post is all about you baby.
Yes, I do know for a fact I am town. Hence why I said it SCUM.

CryMeARiver wrote: The contract is meant because it supports town points CLEARLY.

So since you are CLEARLY such a brilliant player...explain the contracts awesomeness for us lesser minds.

Richard" wrote:Vote: Super Smash Bros Fan for having too long a name.

Are we allowed to self-raise?

Sigh, this question came across very weird to me. No one else had even thought of it prior to this and it seemed, I don't know how to describe it, so I classify it as anti-town. Yes, I realize I am self raising myself, but the fact that he thought to ask the question does not sit right with me.

Richard wrote:Uh...

Fakeclaims are given to scum specifically to counter something like what you suggest.
Early blip on the scumdar.

It was so obvious that he was joking, and you're not one to normally be serious and misunderstand humor. Also, the fake claim thing, why even speculate about scum? You find him scummy for making a joke? Oh please.
But the fact that you took it seriously and are SO advert to it is kind of ridiculous. Why is a mass name claim so bad right now?

Richard wrote:Also, you can't use one game where it was successful and tell me it's 100% proof that it will work this time.

Again the lack of humor he has and again the why does he care so much about a suggested mass name claim? Why did you feel the need to reiterate how bad a mass name claim would be for town?

Richard wrote:The FoS on people not self-raising works both ways. Scum can self-raise too. But then, townies who are not self-raising are suspicious because they are giving scum a clear oppurtunity to get more raise votes.

Again with the speculation about scum, the WIFOM, and reading it from a scum standpoint makes more sense to me than reading it from a town standpoint.

Richard wrote:@CMAR: I find it pretty hilarious that you have a "genuine scum read" on me when we're only on Page 3 and nothing has even happened yet. If you have actual reasons, I'd like to see them. Otherwise, stop trolling.

Hey guys, look here, blatant contradiction, number 1 scumtell!
So I'm trolling because there is no way I found a scumread through three pages. But, this is okay?:

Richard wrote:Fakeclaims are given to scum specifically to counter something like what you suggest.

Early blip on the scumdar.

Hmmm...so it's not okay for me to scumhunt in three pages, but you can scumhunt with one? Why am I not allowed to scumhunt again?

Richard wrote:Also, I do not agree to the contract.

If there is a pro-town reason for not agreeing with the contract, by all means, explain it to me.

Richard wrote:Screw it

##Unvote Vote CMAR

Trying to lead town out of RVS on PAGE 2, claiming he has a scumread on me when I haven't done anything wrong, and stating he knows "for a fact" that he is town. Oh, and the contract thing, too.

Seriously, what townie does all that?

Sweeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeet, now I'm scummy for trying to help the town in his words. This is pure brilliance folks

[quote=CryMeARiver]
Obviously you didn't read the 2 pages of thread because I clearly stated RVS was over.
[/quote]

1. I don't know what RVS means.

2. Why the heck do I care if you declare something over anyway?

Wow I am having mega tag failure today.

Benmage wrote:

CryMeARiver wrote: The contract is meant because it supports town points CLEARLY.

So since you are CLEARLY such a brilliant player...explain the contracts awesomeness for us lesser minds.

I never said I was a brilliant player.

Numbers 1, 3, 4 are just pains on lynches. No one likes having all the WIFOM when it comes down to a serious lynch.

Number 2 is because I ABSOLUTELY HATE when people vote without providing reasoning. I really don't care if the reasoning is "I like so and so's case on so and so", but give me something. Also, it's an antitown thing to vote someone without giving them something to defend themselves against, barring RVS, which we are now out of.

DrModem wrote:

CryMeARiver wrote: Obviously you didn't read the 2 pages of thread because I clearly stated RVS was over.

1. I don't know what RVS means.

2. Why the heck do I care if you declare something over anyway?

RVS = Random Voting Stage
Because lengthy RVS's do not help the town in any way, so I am looking to start genuinely scumhunt.

RVS for me doesn't end until day 2.

DrModem wrote:RVS for me doesn't end until day 2.

Sigh, that is the most ridiculous comment I've ever heard.

Not my problem.

animorpherv1 wrote:

vote: MafiaSSK

- policy lynch

wait, SSK's not in the game?

unvote, vote: Fate

- for stalking me

wait, Fate's not in this game either?

unvote, vote: Drippereth

for being the last o the list.