Grimmjow wrote:cjdrum wrote:Grimmjow, as scum, you would still be "fishing" for who is Cop/Doc/JK. Actually, my understanding of fishing is that it is a scum tactic used to get Power Roles to out themselves and allow themselves to be NKd.
Ok, touché. I can understand that. I didn't consider the ramifications of asking this as scum. Also, as my first game, I'm not completely sure how this game plays out, so I didn't think about scum needing to hunt down PRs. I can see that though. And I can agree that this does seem a little fishy, now that I *think* that I understand gameplay a bit better.
And not only for the NK, as well: Scum need to know just how many PRs there are. Back in F11, there were 3 possible options that would give at least one PR to either side: No Roleblocker (RB) for scum with either one cop, one doc, or none; or an RB and either both PRs or none. As you may see, knowing exactly how many PRs there are, and which ones (if applicable) is very important for scum to know.
Grimmjow wrote:sanchocolates wrote:So youGrimmjow wrote:However, as town, I most certainly would need to do this.weretrying to get information using those questions?
No, I was not trying to get information. I simply stated that, as town, I would need try to get information.
So you were just saying that you would have to do this, and was not posting those in order to get info? Just making sure I understand correctly.
Grimmjow wrote:Voidedmafia wrote:However, Grimmjow, you could have chosen a better topic to start on. It's generally not good to start off asking about roles this early, from what i've heard.
I thought this was the point: trying to figure out what role everyone has. And I wasn't actually asking anyone what their role was. I just asked if you had a preference and if you were happy with what role you got.
It's still a rather touchy subject this early in the game.
[/quote]Grimmjow wrote:sanchocolates wrote:Random votes generate discussion and possibly let people slip up and give us bit of information as to which role they have. Those give us clues and then we can work from that.
I don't understand how random votes generate discussion. I thought the point of a random vote was to just "get things over with."
Nonsense. If you want things to be over with, just don't RVS.
Whether or not you actually ascribe to the practice is up to you, however.
Oswald: So, if your vote is an actual, non-RVS vote, care telling us why you're voting him?