Mafiascum.net

Two of them are ongoing. The third, I wasn't involved with, but after searching I found this: http://mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopic.ph ... 3#p3458783

Guys, I think my lover is scum.

...is your lover Isa?

haha how awkward would the QT be if you were pushing a lynch on your lover XD Oh man this setup is fun

↑ pinkfloyd wrote:...is your lover Isa?

haha how awkward would the QT be if you were pushing a lynch on your lover XD Oh man this setup is fun

Why would you assume it is Isa? Is it because you're his scumbuddy?

↑ nintendoaddict1 wrote:

↑ pinkfloyd wrote:
VOTE: nintendo for being terrible at maths.

Don't you think we're out of RVS by now? Or are you just looking for a way to justify your OMGUS?

-_____-
What...?

@Isa: If you were voting for a policy lynch why did you not say so and why switch the vote so easily?

I am obviously open for other suggestions, as shown by my change in vote. My vote was serious in the sense that it had a real meaning behind it and I'd like to see uncledaphne lynched regardless of his alignment. That doesn't mean I will only push for his lynch today - there's a difference between saying that I am not unwilling to policy lynch him, and saying that I WILL policy lynch him.

Why would you assume it is Isa? Is it because you're his scumbuddy?

No because I generally find him scummy.

-_____-
What...?

Actually, looking back at that, it wasn't even OMGUS. Fail.

The thing is, if we mis judge a townie for being scum we still kill his/her lover and that lover could very much be a mafia player. Like already mentioned we can only mis lynch one town/town pair.

I'm also feeling that from our QT we might be able to feel scummy remarks or town thinking. For now I'm not liking Isa just stabbing in the dark and also pretending that he wasn't aware of the town/scum pairing when it actually IS stated in our role PM's unlike what he has said earlier.

↑ pinkfloyd wrote:I'm also feeling that from our QT we might be able to feel scummy remarks or town thinking. For now I'm not liking Isa just stabbing in the dark and also pretending that he wasn't aware of the town/scum pairing when it actually IS stated in our role PM's unlike what he has said earlier.

Reread. It was stated that we do not know the alignment of our partner in our PM's, but CN stated that it was stated in his PM that scum cannot be aligned with scum. It's true, it says so in the rules, but it is not something written in our PM's.

Reread. It was stated that we do not know the alignment of our partner in our PM's, but CN stated that it was stated in his PM that scum cannot be aligned with scum. It's true, it says so in the rules, but it is not something written in our PM's.

It does not say anything about scum not being able to be paired up with scum in my PM.

That in response to Chaotic Neutrality saying:

I agree, and I found his original question scummy since it explicitly said otherwise in our PMs.

All he said was our PM's said otherwise to the mafia being pared. Which it did. Isa you are opportunistic scum.

↑ pinkfloyd wrote:
The thing is, if we mis judge a townie for being scum we still kill his/her lover and that lover could very much be a mafia player. Like already mentioned we can only mis lynch one town/town pair.

Oh, exactly yeah.
We can obviously win the game by finding the 2 mafia and lynching them.
Alternatively however, we can also win the game by correctly identifing a town-town pair and lynching everyone apart from them. Since mafia have no night kill.
It might not be a bad idea to reveal the pairs and lynch the scummiest two if you know what I mean.

↑ pinkfloyd wrote:All he said was our PM's said otherwise to the mafia being paired. Which it did. Isa you are opportunistic scum.

Thank you, that was put quite nicely.

VOTE: Isa

↑ Maxous wrote:Alternatively however, we can also win the game by correctly identifing a town-town pair and lynching everyone apart from them. Since mafia have no night kill.
It might not be a bad idea to reveal the pairs and lynch the scummiest two if you know what I mean.

I like this idea.

↑ Chaotic Neutrality wrote:

↑ Maxous wrote:Alternatively however, we can also win the game by correctly identifing a town-town pair and lynching everyone apart from them. Since mafia have no night kill.
It might not be a bad idea to reveal the pairs and lynch the scummiest two if you know what I mean.

I like this idea.

imokaywiththis.jpg

I am now certain that my lover is scum. So lynch me.

UNVOTE: VOTE: nintendoaddict1

My lover may choose to step forward if they so wish.

nintendo.. tell us what was said.

↑ Maxous wrote:nintendo.. tell us what was said.

Well without quoting, they just come off as really scummy in the QT and they are acting a bit differently in the thread than in the QT.

↑ pinkfloyd wrote:

Reread. It was stated that we do not know the alignment of our partner in our PM's, but CN stated that it was stated in his PM that scum cannot be aligned with scum. It's true, it says so in the rules, but it is not something written in our PM's.

It does not say anything about scum not being able to be paired up with scum in my PM.

That in response to Chaotic Neutrality saying:

I agree, and I found his original question scummy since it explicitly said otherwise in our PMs.

All he said was our PM's said otherwise to the mafia being pared. Which it did. Isa you are opportunistic scum.

Alright, I have to admit that this is a good point. UNVOTE:

VOTE: Isa

I'm at L-2 now.

I will not provide details of why I am selfvoting until a few things have been sorted out.

Isa is my lover, lynch either one of us. If Isa was town, he would have claimed to be my lover in thread when I left the opportunity there for him to do so. His failure to do so and his pointless self-vote make him scum.

Im sorry about Auction Mafia it was a big mistake on my part but I couldnt stand Mego any longer. Also, your pushing too hard on the policy lynch. Self voting is a big no-no

↑ nintendoaddict1 wrote:UNVOTE: VOTE: Isa

So, Isa, who is your buddy? Is it Robotnick? Or maybe pinkfloyd?

This went way faster than I expected.

It's a shame Nintendoaddict didn't explain more of his case. I doubt he'd selfhammer like that if he was scum, so good luck tomorrow.

...

I didn't expect Nintendoaddict to be so confident in his read that he'd hammer, but selfvoting as a way of putting pressure instead of joining the bandwagon, which had many more votes seemed to me like he was trying to build town cred for whatever reason. My scum read on him faltered only when he put down the hammer on himself - not pro-scum.