↑jasonT1981 wrote:Sottyrulez eh? I take it Zach/Sotty hydra as opposed to just Sotty which is listed?
↑jasonT1981 wrote:
Over compensating already... oh dear.
VOTE: Ser Arthur Dayne
Why didn't you comment on SAD's post in your first post?
SAD? who?
Posted: Wed Jan 23, 2013 12:14 pm
by jasonT1981
Ah nevermind....
To answer, he had not posted when I made my first post...
how could I have?
Posted: Wed Jan 23, 2013 12:15 pm
by The Mini-Librarian
His is 22...
Posted: Wed Jan 23, 2013 12:15 pm
by The Mini-Librarian
Gah.
I mean why didn't you mention it in post 23.
My bad.
Posted: Wed Jan 23, 2013 12:19 pm
by jasonT1981
didn't catch my eye until I took a 2nd read through. When I saw it I made my thoughts on it...
you will see over time that my quoting and talking about others will sometimes be out of order. I will sometimes talk about something that was said after something else I will talk about.
And all you heard was me rambling lol.. you will get used to it. But in short it only caught my eye the 2nd time around.
↑ChannelDelibird wrote:Petapan's vote drew my attention to absta's #8, which is more likely to be a scum post than a detached vote for nobody in particular.
Really?
Course it is. It can feel braver as scum to make a confrontation (for want of an apt but less serious word) like that of a page-one statement. I certainly felt that way as scum once or twice; consciously or otherwise.
I'm not sure I follow... you think scum seek confrontation?
↑absta101 wrote:I'm not used to this speed. My activity/effort should get better after this friday which is my last exam. Not sure if I've already mentioned that.
What Speed?
Posted: Wed Jan 23, 2013 12:43 pm
by TheGreatestAmericanHero
Jason, why is 22 more likely to come from scum? Thoughts on peta's 37 then?
We won't be signing posts, as we feel that our posting styles are easily distinguishable. rofl doesn't capatilize anything.
Posted: Wed Jan 23, 2013 12:50 pm
by DeasVail
Vote: CDB
Posted: Wed Jan 23, 2013 1:42 pm
by Ser Arthur Dayne
Vote: jason
This is good shit right here. Mofo gets real tight and scared and shit, tellin' ya he's hiding wires.
Posted: Wed Jan 23, 2013 1:43 pm
by Ser Arthur Dayne
↑Vifam wrote:I don't like black people, I'm requesting a white man role
You my niqqa why you be hatin' though?
Posted: Wed Jan 23, 2013 1:43 pm
by ChannelDelibird
↑Benmage wrote:I'm not sure I follow... you think scum seek confrontation?
Not quite, as I tried and failed to express, and close. My experience is that sometimes scum can feel like they should engage actively with an early part of the conversation, be it escalating a random joke or, in this case, picking out a post and flipping it back at the poster as a jokey reason to vote them off the bat. It's certainly something that I've done as scum before, to varying degrees of being conscious about it.
To be honest, I'm not 100% convinced that I've accurately expressed in writing there what feels like a really simple notion in my head, so apologies if it's still unclear. It's just about a psychological compulsion, in the unpredictable early stages of the game, to "do something town", whatever that means for the player in question.
↑jasonT1981 wrote:And all you heard was me rambling lol.. you will get used to it. But in short it only caught my eye the 2nd time around.
You take extra caution to make your jokes, or you hiding some wires?
Posted: Wed Jan 23, 2013 1:52 pm
by Benmage
@SAD, RP'rs are annoying. Please stop.
@CBD I think I get what you're suggesting, or trying to explain...from my experience scum can tend to overthink how to "properly" interject themselves into a game. I often find over-the-top 'cutesy' attitudes to come from scum. Is this the case here.... I don't know.
Posted: Wed Jan 23, 2013 1:53 pm
by Benmage
^Early cutesy behavior that is, not necessarily their first game post.
Posted: Wed Jan 23, 2013 1:54 pm
by ChannelDelibird
↑Benmage wrote:@CBD I think I get what you're suggesting, or trying to explain...from my experience scum can tend to overthink how to "properly" interject themselves into a game. I often find over-the-top 'cutesy' attitudes to come from scum. Is this the case here.... I don't know.
Yeah, this is my point, and what I'm not saying is "this is proof that absta is scum". I'm saying "this reason why absta could be scum is a better reason to vote him than it is to leave a random vote on somebody else".